Red Cross set to accept new Mideast emblem

Status
Not open for further replies.

Heath

Active Member
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
8,069
Reaction score
1
The next time you watch the nightly t.v. news and you notice the ambulances rushing to the scene in the Middle East. You will see new logos on the ambulances as they flash lights and roar right by on the nightly t.v. news.

GENEVA - Years of campaigning is on the verge of bringing the Israelis and Palestinians into the Red Cross humanitarian movement thanks to a pending solution to bridge long-standing sensitivities over Crusaders, crosses and crescents.

The two-day International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, opening Tuesday, is being asked to approve changes to meet Israeli demands of almost six decades that it be granted full membership without using the cross or crescent to identify itself.

At the center of the plan is the addition of a third, neutral emblem — a blank, red-bordered square standing on one corner — that could stand alone or frame the Red Shield of David of the Israeli rescue society Magen David Adom.

The emblem — dubbed the "red crystal" — was approved over Muslim objections in a hard-fought diplomatic conference in December. But that was only the first step, and the conference has been called to complete the job.

The simple red cross on a white background — the reversal of colors of the Swiss flag — was adopted as the emblem of the movement when it was founded in 1863 after Swiss humanitarian Henry Dunant was horrified by the carnage and unattended casualties he saw during a one-day battle between Austrian and Franco-Sardinian forces on June 24, 1859, at Solferino, Italy.

But the symbol unintentionally reminded Muslims of the Christian Crusaders, and they insisted on their own red crescent in the 19th century.

When Israel's society bid for membership in 1949, it objected to using either the cross or crescent, and the Red Cross movement refused to admit yet another emblem.

The society and its friends, including the American Red Cross, have been campaigning for years to find a way out of the stalemate.

While there has been some interest outside the Middle East in the new emblem, it was designed primarily to meet Israel's objections. Magen David Adom can combine it with the red star to create a new logo.

Israel's military will be able to use the crystal by itself on a white flag as an emblem protecting medics and other humanitarian workers helping war casualties.

Eritrea is considering using the crystal to contain both the cross and crescent if its society joins the movement. Some Europeans have weighed using it temporarily in areas where the cross or crescent alone may be unwelcome.

But any society could combine the emblem with the cross or crescent — or both — for temporary use.

The crystal was initially approved in December by the diplomatic conference of the 192 nations that have signed the Geneva Conventions on the conduct of war. Now the crystal must be accepted by the full movement, which also includes the international bodies of the Red Cross and the 183 national Red Cross and Red Crescent societies.

Besides welcoming the Israeli society, the conference also is being asked to admit the Palestine Red Crescent. Ordinarily societies have to be associated with a sovereign state, which isn't the case for the Palestinians. But international officials want a special exception because of Middle East tensions.

"For us, it's a great advantage that they both be recognized simultaneously, that they are both equal, that they both play by the same rules and are accountable to same group of their peers," said Ian Piper, spokesman for the International Committee of the Red Cross.

"It's the humanitarian imperative that counts," Piper said. "Both societies coming in together in equality will serve the interests of the people in the Middle East best."

As part of the package last year, Magen David Adom and the Palestinian body agreed to allow each other's paramedics to operate unmolested. But that wasn't enough to sway the Arab vote.

International Red Cross officials would like to see the changes approved by consensus, but say that if they have to go to a vote, a two-thirds majority of those present and voting can pass them.

Pictures of the new logo can be seen here at:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060619/ap_on_re_eu/red_cross_israel
 
I think this is incredibly stupid. I understand that those who follow a different religious system don't want to be associated with an opposiing religion's symbol, but that's like saying we won't wave the Swiss flag because it has a cross on it, or the Turkey flag because it has a crescent on it, or not working for someone because their insurance coverage is from "Blue Cross."

Now things are going to be opened up to having the Red Tree Crystal, the Red Buddah Crystal, the Red Jedi Crystal, and the Red Scientologist Crystal. GAH.
 
Dennis said:
...or not working for someone because their insurance coverage is from "Blue Cross."....
Shhh! Don't give anyone more crazy ideas! ;)
 
Dennis said:
I think this is incredibly stupid. I understand that those who follow a different religious system don't want to be associated with an opposiing religion's symbol, but that's like saying we won't wave the Swiss flag because it has a cross on it, or the Turkey flag because it has a crescent on it, or not working for someone because their insurance coverage is from "Blue Cross."

So you think that Muslim-majority nations should be required to fly the red cross flag for their red-cross-like organisations if they want to be part of the international organisation?

Do you think that Israel as a Jewish-majority nation should be required to fly the red cross flag for their red-cross-like organisation (Magen David Adom) if they want to be part of the international organisation?


Dennis said:
Now things are going to be opened up to having the Red Tree Crystal, the Red Buddah Crystal, the Red Jedi Crystal, and the Red Scientologist Crystal. GAH.

Red Tree? What the heck does that represent?

The symbol of Buddhism is the wheel, not the Buddha.

There are no countries in the world where "Jedi" or "Sceintology" are majority (or even mainstream) religions.
 
This is such crap...it's an organization, with the intent to save lives, not political agendas. :|
 
Cynical Vez said:
This is such crap...it's an organization, with the intent to save lives, not political agendas. :|

Which is exactly why it's a good thing that there's now a neutral symbol that says "humanitarian aid - don't shoot". I suspect that the Red Cross symbol is a liability in parts of the world, rather than the protective emblem it was meant to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top