Michael Schiavo fighting against politicans

Liebling:-)))

Liebling:-)))

Sussi *7.7.86 - 18.6.09*
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
31,020
Reaction score
10
for interfere people´s privacy.

Yes I´m agree that government should stay out of people´s private life.

TerriPAC
 
word. :smoking:

It wasn't even our business to see whats going on with his wife in the first place either.
 
Steel X said:
word. :smoking:

It wasn't even our business to see whats going on with his wife in the first place either.
Click to expand...

It´s not Michael who brought the scandal to the public and also to the world in first place but Terri´s parents.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
It´s not Michael who brought the scandal to the public and also to the world in first place but Terri´s parents.
Click to expand...

For once, I agree with you!

I hope Michael's push to re-elect more liberal officials is successful! What happened here in FL should NEVER happen again. (and I'm talking about the media circus that came about during the litigation).
 
Oceanbreeze said:
She thinks he's crazy for campaigning against the politicians who voted to enact "Terri's Law", which interfered in Terri's right to privacy.
Click to expand...

Yup.. you got it!
:D

*pssst* Oceanbreeze, Really you? (Avatar) Good see'n you today your picture post it!
I proud you... what you did.. *appluase for you* (wink)
 
Let me get this straight.

Michael Schiavo is using his dead wife's name for a political action committe. In other words, he's using her tragedy for political advantage.

Am I the only person who sees the sick irony of this?
 
Reba said:
Let me get this straight.

Michael Schiavo is using his dead wife's name for a political action committe. In other words, he's using her tragedy for political advantage.

Am I the only person who sees the sick irony of this?
Click to expand...

Or he's using her story to promote the ideals that would have allowed her to die as she would have (according to him) wished. How is it any different than Megan's Law or the AMBER Alert?
 
ismi said:
Or he's using her story to promote the ideals that would have allowed her to die as she would have (according to him) wished. How is it any different than Megan's Law or the AMBER Alert?
Click to expand...
Michael accuses politicians of using Terri to promote their own political agendas. He's doing the same thing.

The only people opposing Megan's Law or AMBER Alert would be kidnappers, killers, and pedophiles; in other words, criminals. Criminals don't have any "right" to commit their acts. There is no comparison.

Terri didn't have her right to die as she wished denied; she failed to make her wishes known in a clear and legal way while she was able. It would be a different matter if they had refused to honor her living will or DNR order, if she had had one. But that didn't happen.
 
Well, the parents of Terri Shavio should not get the public to dirt Michael´s image in first place. :cool:
 
Reba said:
Terri didn't have her right to die as she wished denied; she failed to make her wishes known in a clear and legal way while she was able. It would be a different matter if they had refused to honor her living will or DNR order, if she had had one. But that didn't happen.
Click to expand...

She didn't make her wishes officially known, that's true. But that doesn't mean that she didn't make her wishes known to her husband. Whether the law should consider that enough is the question at hand.

And it's not correct to say that no one opposes Megan's Law other than criminals. The specifics of the law are questioned by some who point out that some of the acts that make one a sex offender - public nudity (streaking, for instance), anal sex (until Lawrence v. Texas relatively recently), and adultery - are not worthy of a lifetime punishment, or otherwise point out the inherent problems of administering justice through a policy of zero tolerance.

Then, too, there are those who consider Megan's Law, even if applied only to the worst cases, including those whose victims are children, to be an ineffective feel-good measure. They argue that harsher sentences - such as life imprisonment - would be far more effective.
 
ismi said:
...Then, too, there are those who consider Megan's Law, even if applied only to the worst cases, including those whose victims are children, to be an ineffective feel-good measure. They argue that harsher sentences - such as life imprisonment - would be far more effective.
Click to expand...
I say do both. Use Megan's Law, AND harsher sentences.
 
Reba said:
I say do both. Use Megan's Law, AND harsher sentences.
Click to expand...

That's an entirely valid point of view. There are "false sense of security" arguments made against today's implementations of Megan's Law (NB: I'm not trying to make that argument now, I'm just saying they exist), but it could be argued that a two-pronged approach would fix that.

Regardless, I think it's a similar situation - using the name of an individual who was involved in a tragedy to further a political cause. I just don't think that's outside the bounds of good taste. Now, if he were running for office using his wife's name, that would be a different story.
 
Let me get this straight.

Michael Schiavo is using his dead wife's name for a political action committe. In other words, he's using her tragedy for political advantage.

Am I the only person who sees the sick irony of this?
Click to expand...

Whoa! Michael was a very private person and wanted the case handled privately. It was Terri's parents that brought the case into the media circus. The politicians got involved which they shouldn't be. He never allowed the videos or pictures of Terri, it was the looney right wing organizations that spread those images.

And on autopsy, it revealed that she's a lot worse than originally thought. Clearly, Michael did the right thing by letting her go.

Mind your own business, it's none of your business. You know NOTHING about Michael or his family or the case. The conservative courts have ruled in favor of HIM over 20 times.

Get over with it.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
Well, the parents of Terri Shavio should not get the public to dirt Michael´s image in first place. :cool:
Click to expand...

Oh well.... the parents did right thing...Michael had mentally abused Terri for long time before she fell sick.... he was womanizer.... he wanted Terri to stay slim...she was slim... he was not happy... so she went on starvation.. thats how she got sick
 
SxyPorkie said:
Oh well.... the parents did right thing...Michael had mentally abused Terri for long time before she fell sick.... he was womanizer.... he wanted Terri to stay slim...she was slim... he was not happy... so she went on starvation.. thats how she got sick
Click to expand...

Well, I would not spread my children´s marriage life to the world because it´s none of my business. It´s between them, not us as parents.

It´s Terri´s parents who claimed bad things about Michael´s and Terri´s marriage life and tried to get supporter to on their side against Michael to the world which is not right. Marriage life belongs privacy between 2 people, not everyone.
 
Back
Top