Man pays for county's mistake in child-support case

Jolie77

New Member
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Messages
8,727
Reaction score
9
Man pays for county mistake
He lands in jail and loses job over wrong ID in support case

When Walter Andre Sharpe Jr. signed for a certified letter from Dauphin County Domestic Relations in 2001, he didn't know he was signing on for a seven-year nightmare.

Since then, the Philadelphia man has been thrown in jail four times, lost his job, become estranged from his four children and spent more than $12,000 to support the child of another man.

It finally stopped in May 2007 when a judge reversed a finding that he was the father.

But the same judge has since ruled that Sharpe is not entitled to any compensation, not even the money he was forced to pay to support the child.

Sharpe's attorney, Tabetha Tanner, said the county Domestic Relations office "stole" Sharpe's identity by exchanging his date of birth, address and Social Security number for that of the father.

The agency fought Sharpe's attempts to have DNA testing and said it determined he was the father "after reasonable investigation."

Yet it took The Patriot-News less than an hour to track down the real father, Andre Sharpe, who said the girl that Walter Sharpe has been paying support for has been living with him for the last four years.

But in court papers, Domestic Relations blamed Walter Sharpe, a former trash collector, for not filing the proper motions in court to "disestablish paternity."

"What type of investigation were they doing if you can track this guy down in less than eight hours?" Walter Sharpe asked. "It just pisses me off. I tried my best to clear myself of this case, and it fell on deaf ears. It's like I'm guilty until proven innocent. I'm just another man crying, 'I don't know this person. I don't have their kid.' It's a routine they're just used to."

For full story, Click here - (It's 6 pages long but worth a read)

Man pays for county mistake - PennLive.com

The Man paid $12,000 child support over a 7 year period. The kid isn't his, he won't get his money back and all he did was sign a delivery tag. Ouch!
 
Oh, jeez! :shock:

He should have read it first and not to sign it.
 
For full story, Click here - (It's 6 pages long but worth a read)

Man pays for county mistake - PennLive.com

The Man paid $12,000 child support over a 7 year period. The kid isn't his, he won't get his money back and all he did was sign a delivery tag. Ouch!

:jaw: Unbelievable! Wish he should have read it before he signed on it... this would probably save his life from landin' in jail.
 
:jaw: Unbelievable! Wish he should have read it before he signed on it... this would probably save his life from landin' in jail.

Its all about choice. He chose not to read it, and therefore, chose to accept the consequences of choosing not to read it.
 
Its all about choice. He chose not to read it, and therefore, chose to accept the consequences of choosing not to read it.

You have to sign for a certified letter before you can read it. Not all certified letters will say who actually sent it. Just a return address.
 
You have to sign for a certified letter before you can read it. Not all certified letters will say who actually sent it. Just a return address.

Yeah, but simply signing for the letter is not a legal obligation for anything. It simply proves that you have received the letter. If there is something in that letter that you disagree with, then you need to attend to it immediately. Not reading a certified letter? Sorry, but that is just naive.
 
Damn. I'll be royally pissed and be contacting every attorney that I know will be money thirsty and go after the agencies that did this.
 
Just because a person signed a certified letter does not make him legally obligated.

The courts already admitted to mistaken identity.

What more do they want?

It was not his fault.

If the court ADMITTED to it, then it is the fault of the prosecutors or the dept of revenue.

He should be reimbursed by the legal father for Back pay and the court cost should be by the court that erred.
 
Back
Top