Man, 92, wins $1.9 million tobacco judgment in wife's death

shel90

Love Makes the World Go Round
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
45,009
Reaction score
336
Man, 92, wins $1.9 million tobacco judgment in wife's death - CNN.com




(CNN) -- A Florida jury awarded a 92-year-old man $1.9 million in compensatory damages for the death of his wife, a former two-pack-a-day Marlboro smoker who started when she was 16 and died in her 70s, attorneys said Thursday.

The jury of five women and one man deliberated for slightly more than a day before deciding on the amount, attorneys for both sides said. The jurors put the total award at $5.3 million but found that Philip Morris USA was only 36.5 percent responsible for the lung cancer that plaintiffs said killed Leon Barbanell's wife.

Shirley Barbanell herself was deemed 63.5 percent responsible, the attorneys said.

Plaintiff's attorney Jonathan Gdanski said the jury found a design defect and a breach of warranty.

Philip Morris announced that it plans to appeal the case, one of thousands of "Engle progeny" cases, named after a 2006 Florida Supreme Court decision that decertified a class-action lawsuit against the tobacco industry. That case involved Dr. Howard A. Engle, a Miami Beach pediatrician and smoker who served as the lead plaintiff in the class-action suit.

The decertification decision let former class members file lawsuits individually, and thousands did.

The Florida Supreme Court also allowed some factual findings about smoking causing disease be taken from Engle case and applied to the progeny cases "so plaintiff's attorneys don't have to start from square one in each of these cases," said Ed Sweda, a lawyer for the Tobacco Products Liability Project in Boston, Massachusetts.

The industry has balked at that. "Today's verdict is the result of a severely prejudicial trial plan," said Murray Garnick, Altria Client Services senior vice president and associate general counsel, speaking on behalf of Philip Morris USA, in a written statement. "From beginning to end, this case was marked by legal rulings that should be reversed on appeal, including allowing this jury to rely almost exclusively on findings by a prior jury that have no direct connection with the plaintiff in this case."

So far, six of the eight Engle cases that have gone to trial have come back with a plaintiff's verdict, said Sweda. "Another bunch are in the pipeline ready for trial this year," he said.

About Thursday's verdict, he said, "This is certainly a clear indication that tobacco litigation is alive and well."

Gdanski said his firm has more than 150 Engle cases. "We're more than happy to keep trying them," he stated.


Do you think he should be awarded?
 
I would say maybe because if she started smoking at 16 back in those days no one knew the danger of smoking.
 
Yes, Pepsi. I'm not old enough to remember the ads but the tobacco companies paid scientists to say smoking was safe. They suppressed scientific evidence that smoking is harmful.

My dad began smoking during WWII. Many soldiers came back addicted to cigarettes and/or alcohol. In the 50's and 60's, tobacco companies heavily market to women. My mom's generation smoked while pregnant. Maybe that's what's wrong with me! :eek3:

Here's some vintage ads:

40 Gorgeous Vintage Tobacco Advertisements // WellMedicated

LOL @ the Ronald Reagan ad and the doctor endorsements!

:smoking: <-- smilie endorsement
 
No, this is utter bullshit. Anyone who smokes knows full well of the consequences that will bring. Blaming someone for their bad health is dodging their own personal responsibility.

Just ask McDonald regarding the hot coffee incident.

People see dollar signs all the time and will do anything to cash it in.

Yiz
 
One note. Products liability eliminated baby trap cribs. My generation didn't have child safety regulations, some us just didn't survive. Have you seen one of those cribs? Death traps!

It saved drivers from steering wheels that impale (charming incidents). Remember the exploding Pinto? There was a smoking gun memo that included a cost-benefit analysis for a known defect causing fatalities. Oh, and more recently, defective Firestone tires with a unstable SUV design. It's a wonder that so many of us are still here.

And who would think that a fast food joint would serve coffee at a temperature capable of causing 3rd degree burns instantaneously? I had no idea. How about a warning label: don't spill this hot beverage in your hooha or you will instantly suffer third degree burns requiring extensive plastic surgery that does not restore normal function. :shock:
 
And who would think that a fast food joint would serve coffee at a temperature capable of causing 3rd degree burns instantaneously? I had no idea. How about a warning label: don't spill this hot beverage in your hooha or you will instantly suffer third degree burns requiring extensive plastic surgery that does not restore normal function. :shock:

lol, i love your quip sallylou
 
$1.9 million? That's too much money. She died when she was 70's...that's kinda average lifespan....the lawsuit makes no sense to me.
 
Pain and suffering. 3rd degree burned vagina (ewww! that's a lot of pain). Can't pee right or have sex (yes, even old people do that). Exemplary damages (for failing to properly consider consumer safety).

Ya'll watch out for that hot coffee! No coffee in the lap where it might spill in "delicate" places. :eek2: :giggle:
 
$1.9 million? That's too much money. She died when she was 70's...that's kinda average lifespan....the lawsuit makes no sense to me.

makes-no-sense.jpg


Because they are literally retarded.
 
Back
Top