Lending ears to learners.....*gags*

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,160
Reaction score
7
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-deafed_21sep21,1,5109513.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

A beige plastic device the size of a quarter that peeks from his sandy blond hair is the only visible sign Adam Ballent is profoundly deaf.

He takes notes as his teachers lecture in class at Naperville North High School. He hollers on the soccer field when his club team scores. He recites the Boy Scout pledge with other members of his troop.

"Sometimes, when it's really noisy, I can't hear what people are saying," said Ballent, his words easily understood. "But most of the time, I can."

Ballent never learned sign language. He has no deaf friends. And at age 16, the sophomore is at the forefront of a wave of deaf children with cochlear implants who are entering mainstream classrooms across the country, following a path paved with high hopes and bitter controversy.

In 1996, after major advances in the revolutionary technology -- which stimulates auditory nerves in the inner ear and costs about $50,000 -- the first "oral deaf education" school in Illinois opened to teach young children with cochlear implants how to speak and hear. Since then, Child's Voice, in Wood Dale, has served more than 130 children, with many graduates going on to school districts throughout northern Illinois. Several similar programs have sprung up.

Meanwhile, the Illinois School for the Deaf, which serves students through high school using sign language as a teaching method, has seen sharp declines in enrollment. So have the public schools' special-education programs for the deaf.

"The first waves of deaf children [with implants] are starting to hit mainstream schools," said Barbara Sims, who oversees deaf and hard-of-hearing programs for the Illinois State Board of Education.

The shift is occurring across the country, said Thomas Kluwin, director of institutional research at Gallaudet University that serves the deaf in Washington, D.C.

Nearly 40,000 children in the U.S. are deaf or hard of hearing, including close to 3,000 in Illinois, according to a Gallaudet survey. Thirty years ago, 80 percent were in residential, specialized programs for the deaf, while 20 percent attended public school. Today, those numbers have flipped, Kluwin said.

Some 22,000 adults and 15,000 children in the U.S. have received the implants, according to the Food and Drug Administration.

Deafness, in general, has proved to be a major obstacle to academic success. Historically, deaf children on average graduate from high school with a 3rd- or 4th-grade reading level.

Proponents of oral education say the new technology and mainstream classes have significantly reduced learning barriers. But critics say the approach could be harmful to some deaf children.

Some say it's a mistake to bar children from learning sign language, a guaranteed method of communication, which they see as the best path to academic success. Others point out that it can be extremely isolating to be the only deaf child in a mainstream setting.

A state task force on deaf education, formed by the Illinois legislature last year, is closely following the oral-deaf experiment.

Adam Ballent had just turned 1-year-old when hospital tests revealed that he is profoundly deaf.

"I'll never forget that night," said his mother, Alice Ballent, as she sat in her Naperville home recalling the 1992 diagnosis. "I felt like someone had broken into my house and stolen part of my child away."

Determined to fill in the missing piece, she and her husband, Tom Ballent, decided to have doctors at Children's Memorial Hospital install a cochlear implant in their son's left inner ear.

But afterward, the boy needed a way to learn how to make sense of the sounds hitting his brain.

At the time, there were no schools in Illinois that taught children with cochlear implants how to speak and hear. The closest were in St. Louis.

So in 1996, the Ballents and two other families with deaf children banded together to establish Child's Voice. It started with one teacher and four students.

Today, its sprawling one-story building in Wood Dale bustles with nearly 80 children ranging in age from several months to 7 years. Half have cochlear implants, half regular hearing aids.

Prohibited from learning sign language, the pupils are submitted to constant auditory training.

It begins with sound recognition. Young children are asked to hold a block, then drop it to the ground every time the teacher makes a sound. From there, it's on to articulating -- over and over and over -- the "tick" of a clock, the "moo" of a cow.

On a recent day, a teacher sat at a low table with two 6-year-old boys. She had an array of stickers in her hands. The boys were asked to select one and place it on his lunch box.

"What is this?" the teacher asked.

"It's a sticker," said a boy with shaggy brown hair, an orange T-shirt and a mischievous smile.

"What are you going to do with it?"

"Put it on my lump boxch."

After two more tries he nailed it.

"Put it on my lunch box."

A four-year-old state law requiring that all newborns be screened for deafness has resulted in early intervention for more children. It's helped put more children on a path to mainstream schools, experts say.

In the 1970s, dozens of local school districts in Chicago's north and northwest suburbs formed an agency to serve deaf students. It offers sign language instruction in self-contained settings in select schools as well as support services to students attending mainstream classes.

Within the last five years, the number of students in those programs has dropped from 120 to 75, while the number of those in mainstream settings has grown from 160 to 240, said Becki Streit, the agency's executive director.

Similarly, since 1995, the number of students with cochlear implants attending Chicago public schools has increased from 8 to 89, said Eileen Andrews, with the district's office of specialized services.

In Adam Ballent's case, a hearing specialist visits him once a month to discuss his progress. The teen, who enjoys English and history more than math and science, is part of his high school's enriched language arts program. When asked what is the hardest part about being deaf, he shrugs.

"I really don't know," he said, seemingly bored by the topic.

Three years ago, Child's Voice invited 30 of its graduates ages 6 through 12 who had entered mainstream schools to come back for a day of academic testing. They scored at levels comparable to their hearing peers.

Some schools say that children with cochlear implants are performing notably higher than deaf children who communicate and learn through mostly sign language.

"Their language levels and vocabulary are much higher," said Joann Kort, special services coordinator for the Schaumburg School District. "So are their reading levels."

But not everyone with cochlear implants enjoys such success, experts say.

Some students with implants have failed to graduate from Child's Voice and go on to mainstream schools. Some turn out to have other disabilities, which hinder their progress, said Child's Voice executive director Michele Wilkins. Others, for unknown reasons, cannot translate their implants into successful language skills.

The results of the oral deaf experiment, experts say, won't be known for years, even decades.

For Adam Ballent and his family, that's fine. They're thrilled with the results they are witnessing.

"It's been a miracle," Alice Ballent said.
 
OMG! This is scary. "Oral only experiements?" Now it is acceptable to experiment on our deaf children? This is like going back in time. Theo ral only thing has been tried once, and it has failed miserably. Deafness is not an obstacle in education....outdated teaching methodologies are the barrier.

Wanting to replace the "missing piece" of your child? I can't tell you how objectionable that is. Implanting children, and then not providing them withthe services to train them to use that CI? Where are the ethics boards on that one?

Subjected to constant AVT? What about being a child?

I'm going to stop. This has to be one of the most offensive articles I have read to date.

Where is everyone now that says stuff like this doesn't happen?
 
Subjected to constant AVT? What about being a child?
Ditto! On one of the pages out there (I can't remmy the name of it since I haven't been in a few years) it says that auditory-verbal is a lifestyle.
Oh GAWD. There's nothing at ALL wrong with SOME AVT. Like most speech therapists aren't really trained to teach dhh kids. But therapy 24/7?
Also, this article sounds like oral only propaganda. Ten years ago AG Bell was heralding a new era of "mainstream CI sucesses".........they had HUGE plans for things like oral 'terps and things like that. I think that this generation of dhh kids is just going to repeat history yet again! SOME kids will do well......but generally those kids tend to be the ones who would have done well even if they had NO accomondations whatsoever. Overall, most dhh kids haven't done all that well orally and in the mainstream.
I wonder how many of the oral only kids have ever assimulated totally into the hearing world.
 
Yeah, I agree with you all. This creeps me out, and this article has the potential to brainwash more parents as well giving them false hope, tsk!
 
See where it says "The others , for unknown reasons, cannot translate using their CIs into successful oral languages are those kids that we work with. If the medical community dont know why then why am I expected to know why too according to some AD members here who gave me a hard time about not being able to state the reasons why those children werent able to benefit from their CIs. :roll:

This is a sick article!
 
comparing intelligence

The real disturbing social issue is the article tries to compare educational results between hearing and deaf and to assign blame for lack of performance on not being able to hear. This is implied in the article. If some Deaf children failed to do as well as their hearing peers, I suspect it is because the deaf children are forced to learn a subject using a foreign language. I would not expect my hearing English speaking children to learn math in a Russian speaking classroom.
They might pass, maybe.But it would not be optimal. I don't think I would
have passed.
 
Do you think in 20 years from now, we will see a different generation of deaf people? The ones that do much worse than "your average 3rd grade reading level deaf folks nowaday" and the ones that thrive in hearing world much better than "deaf people that is pretty successful in hearing world"?

I bet we will be looking at a different generation of deaf people. Half that do well while other half will be much worse off than rest of generation before.
 
Do you think in 20 years from now, we will see a different generation of deaf people? The ones that do much worse than "your average 3rd grade reading level deaf folks nowaday" and the ones that thrive in hearing world much better than "deaf people that is pretty successful in hearing world"?

I bet we will be looking at a different generation of deaf people. Half that do well while other half will be much worse off than rest of generation before.

Who knows? All I know is that I will continue to have high expectations from whoever I teach when it comes to reading and writing. However, my problem and beef is getting new kids referred from the public schools so far behind in language development and are not ready to taclke on reading and writing. It just makes me pissed that wherever they were before allowed them to get so delayed. That's why I am fighting for ASL to be a part of early childhood education for the deaf/hoh cuz that's the time kids should have full not partial access to language. We never know which kid would achieve language development or which kid won't using oral-only so better be safe than sorry.
 
Absolutley!

It has been proven that the sooner the idea or concept of
language,(any language) has been aquired by a child, the
higher the level of intellegence will be! This is why I decided
to teach my children sign language from birth even though
we are all hearing. (I have 7 children) Children are able
to use and manipulate ASL much sooner than oral language.
Being able to sign milk to me at 5 and 1/2 months as my
son did, caused early neurological development and enhanced
his intelleqtual potential. My hearing friends often expressed
concern that my children would be speech delayed because
I focused on sign language. I didn't really, I just signed at the
same time I spoke. (They never express that concern now
as sometimes my children don't want to stop talking!):giggle:

We are going to start learning Spanish next and again we will
learn it at the same time that we sign and do English.
I hope I NEVER stop learning. I think ASL should be incorporated
into preschool and kindergarten like total immersion Japaneese
programs. Parents never worry that their children won't know
English while in the total immersion program!

Early Native Language Aquisition should be the norm. Because
it enhances all of the individuals potential! I know some of the
frustrations of learning in a difficult environment as I didn't find
out I was dsylexic until I was in college. And instead of learning
in what ever manner I was able to, I spent most of my energy
hiding what I hadn't learned from my many teachers. (We moved
alot) That kind of stress delays learning. Down with stress!
 
"Average deaf reader at 3rd grade"

Interesting that teachers are measureing Deaf childrens abilities by their
responses to tests done in English.

I consider myself to be intelligent. I do medical research. I have two
AA degrees and read at a post doctorate level.

How well do I communicate in ASL? I would rate my receptive skills
at about a 1st grade level and my expressive skills at about a 3rd
grade level. How can I be so intelligent in my native language and
struggle so with ASL, even though I have taken the equivilant of
2 full years of college level ASL classes?

Here is the problem. Deaf children should be given tests by a qualified
ASL signer and tester who can interp the questions properly. IE when
a question is designed to test weather or not a child recognizes words
that rhyme the terp should translate that question into a question that
is designed to test weather the Deaf child can recognize hand shapes
that are similar as they are in Deaf poems.

I am NOT saying that Deaf children do not need to learn English. I am
saying that Deaf children need equal and comparative tests. I would
score really high in science if tested in English. I am certain I would be
given a job sorting beakers and washing test tubes if I were tested
using ASL!
 
Wanting to replace the "missing piece" of your child? I can't tell you how objectionable that is.

That sounds like my mom. She has refered to my ENT appointments and hearing aids as a way to "fix" me. My parents expect me to do all the work to meet my communication needs. I can sympathise with these kids. People are f*cking ignorant and stupid. I'm not any less of a person than I was 3 years ago when I was completely hearing. In fact, I'm very much the same. I'd kill for the chance to be able to interact with other deaf/hoh kids. It gets so lonely. :(
 
Do you think in 20 years from now, we will see a different generation of deaf people? The ones that do much worse than "your average 3rd grade reading level deaf folks nowaday" and the ones that thrive in hearing world much better than "deaf people that is pretty successful in hearing world"?

I bet we will be looking at a different generation of deaf people. Half that do well while other half will be much worse off than rest of generation before.


You have a very good point there!
 
Interesting that teachers are measureing Deaf childrens abilities by their
responses to tests done in English.

I consider myself to be intelligent. I do medical research. I have two
AA degrees and read at a post doctorate level.

How well do I communicate in ASL? I would rate my receptive skills
at about a 1st grade level and my expressive skills at about a 3rd
grade level. How can I be so intelligent in my native language and
struggle so with ASL, even though I have taken the equivilant of
2 full years of college level ASL classes?

Here is the problem. Deaf children should be given tests by a qualified
ASL signer and tester who can interp the questions properly. IE when
a question is designed to test weather or not a child recognizes words
that rhyme the terp should translate that question into a question that
is designed to test weather the Deaf child can recognize hand shapes
that are similar as they are in Deaf poems.

I am NOT saying that Deaf children do not need to learn English. I am
saying that Deaf children need equal and comparative tests. I would
score really high in science if tested in English. I am certain I would be
given a job sorting beakers and washing test tubes if I were tested
using ASL!


Thank you! When the testing methods used for the hearing population are applied to deaf students, they loose reliability and validity, and are culturally biased. There have been cognitive tests devised to test rhyming abilites as applied to handshape smiliarity, and those tests indicated that when the testing procedures were adapted for use with the population being tested, the abilities for rhyming recognition were the same.
 
It has been proven that the sooner the idea or concept of
language,(any language) has been aquired by a child, the
higher the level of intellegence will be! This is why I decided
to teach my children sign language from birth even though
we are all hearing. (I have 7 children) Children are able
to use and manipulate ASL much sooner than oral language.
Being able to sign milk to me at 5 and 1/2 months as my
son did, caused early neurological development and enhanced
his intelleqtual potential. My hearing friends often expressed
concern that my children would be speech delayed because
I focused on sign language. I didn't really, I just signed at the
same time I spoke. (They never express that concern now
as sometimes my children don't want to stop talking!):giggle:

We are going to start learning Spanish next and again we will
learn it at the same time that we sign and do English.
I hope I NEVER stop learning. I think ASL should be incorporated
into preschool and kindergarten like total immersion Japaneese
programs. Parents never worry that their children won't know
English while in the total immersion program!

Early Native Language Aquisition should be the norm. Because
it enhances all of the individuals potential! I know some of the
frustrations of learning in a difficult environment as I didn't find
out I was dsylexic until I was in college. And instead of learning
in what ever manner I was able to, I spent most of my energy
hiding what I hadn't learned from my many teachers. (We moved
alot) That kind of stress delays learning. Down with stress!

You speak the truth!
 
That sounds like my mom. She has refered to my ENT appointments and hearing aids as a way to "fix" me. My parents expect me to do all the work to meet my communication needs. I can sympathise with these kids. People are f*cking ignorant and stupid. I'm not any less of a person than I was 3 years ago when I was completely hearing. In fact, I'm very much the same. I'd kill for the chance to be able to interact with other deaf/hoh kids. It gets so lonely. :(

I sympathize with your situation.:hug: You don't need to be fixed, sweetie.....you need human communication. Hang around the board and interact here until you are in a position to seek out the deaf community on your own. I know its not quite the same as hanging out with deaf/hoh kids your age, but it beats nothing.
 
That sounds like my mom. She has refered to my ENT appointments and hearing aids as a way to "fix" me. My parents expect me to do all the work to meet my communication needs. I can sympathise with these kids. People are f*cking ignorant and stupid. I'm not any less of a person than I was 3 years ago when I was completely hearing. In fact, I'm very much the same. I'd kill for the chance to be able to interact with other deaf/hoh kids. It gets so lonely. :(

I'm sorry to read of your situation. Since you were hearing just a mere three years ago, and that you're very much the same, why aren't you saying that you'd kill to have your hearing fully restored instead of what you said above?
Please understand I'm not trying to start anything but it just seems to me that since you were hearing until "recently" and are not yet fully immersed into the deaf world, that you'd be longing for the restoration of the hearing you once had.

At any rate, all the best to you.
 
Dang!

Thank you! When the testing methods used for the hearing population are applied to deaf students, they loose reliability and validity, and are culturally biased. There have been cognitive tests devised to test rhyming abilites as applied to handshape smiliarity, and those tests indicated that when the testing procedures were adapted for use with the population being tested, the abilities for rhyming recognition were the same.

Well shoot! Here I thought I had gone and gotten an original idea!
Not as think as I smart I am!:giggle:

Glad to know someone is working on that!
 
Well shoot! Here I thought I had gone and gotten an original idea!
Not as think as I smart I am!:giggle:

Glad to know someone is working on that!

Nope, its just that great minds think alike! Actually, the research was done by Marshark, et. al. and is published a book that compiles the results of several forms of cognitive processing testing.
 
I'm sorry to read of your situation. Since you were hearing just a mere three years ago, and that you're very much the same, why aren't you saying that you'd kill to have your hearing fully restored instead of what you said above?
Please understand I'm not trying to start anything but it just seems to me that since you were hearing until "recently" and are not yet fully immersed into the deaf world, that you'd be longing for the restoration of the hearing you once had.

At any rate, all the best to you.

I was wanting restoration until about a year ago. But there were problems with not knowing why the loss was occuring, and then by the time they knew a little bit and could speculate about what to do, I wasn't interested. I lost quite a bit of my hearing very rapidly, and three years is a long time. I just got to the point where I accepted it for what it was and no longer see it as there being something "wrong" with me. I hope that answered your question. :)
 
Back
Top