Jindal's letter to the people on the oil spill...

kokonut

New Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
15,855
Reaction score
2
Incredible!! A big, flat "No!" in his face and to the people of Louisanna who are not even allowed to protect their own threatened coastline, lake and wetlands from the advancing oil spill. I got this in my email. No link.

Recently I flew over Lake Pontchartrain which is now threatened by tar balls and oil after decades of work to restore the lake to healthy levels. For weeks we requested 20 miles of boom to create multiple layers of defense for the Lake along with shallow water skimmers. The recent oil impact on Lake Pontchartrain now brings the total amount of shoreline impacted by oil in Louisiana to over 337 miles.

Even with this mounting crisis and rising miles of shoreline impacted by oil, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers rejected a coastal protection measure for Barataria Bay just this past Saturday. This rejection came after a month of meetings, phone calls and compromises to try and win federal approval. We even joined locals to meet with the President on this rock plan around a month ago. We were told that we would get a response in a matter of days. Instead, several weeks later, we got a flat rejection. As I told the Baton Rouge Advocate, only a bureaucrat in Washington, D.C. would say rocks are more harmful to our water than oil. These people need to come to Louisiana. They need to touch the oil, feel the oil, and smell the oil that threatens our way of life here.

Most frustrating of all is that when the federal government denies one of our plans they also fail to offer an alternative. We need the federal government to show a greater sense of urgency and fight this oil like the war that it is. As I also told the New Orleans Times-Picayune, simply saying no is not an answer, no is not a plan, and no is not acceptable.

We need the federal government to recognize that when they reject our defense measures they fundamentally choose for oil to come in our wetlands. That will never be the choice we make. We cannot allow bureaucratic roadblocks to prevent good plans from being implemented.

This week we also took Senator Mary Landrieu and Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus – who the President charged with developing a long-term recovery plan for the Gulf Coast – on a flyover of our coast to show the oil impact here as well as the significant coastal erosion problems we have experienced for generations. This year we were on track to have the lowest rate of land loss in 80 years. Now, that progress is threatened by oil impacting our coast and wetlands. We had a very clear message for Secretary Mabus. The time for coastal restoration studies is over. Our fragile coastline cannot afford years of more studies. We need quick action to restore our coast.

Finally, I am constantly amazed by the perseverance of our people in responding to this disaster. They are on the front lines every day – turning fishing boats into defense ships, dragging boom to stop oil – and always coming up with more ideas to protect our land and waters. It is the same spirit of perseverance that strengthened us through Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Gustav and Ike; and this same perseverance leaves no doubt in my mind that we will win this war against the oil spill and come back better than ever before. To the people of coastal Louisiana, we will stand with you and work alongside you until every drop of oil is off of our coast and out of our waters and all of our fisheries and our industries are 100 percent restored. Our prayers continue to be with those on the coast and every Louisianian who is impacted by this spill.

Sincerely,

Governor Bobby Jindal

Yeah, I guess the people in the WH know what they're doing.

Uh, surreee.

What a bunch of fruits we have in office.


:fruit:
 
Lately, just thinking about this whole thing has put me in a sour mood. The negligence is almost criminal. I wonder what legal charges can be taken against not only BP, but also the federal government. As radical as it may sound, I'm thinking the EPA should be disbanded since they've shown they do far more to damage the environment than protect it. Sorry if I seem to be in a bad mood, but I'm disgusted right now.
 
I don't blame you, DD. This is utterly galling to see them do those things on purpose. Why are people quiet about this?
 
I don't blame you, DD. This is utterly galling to see them do those things on purpose. Why are people quiet about this?

That's what I'd like to know. I have yet to receive a single reply to the letters I have written to my congressmen.
 
I don't know what's worse- the criminal negligence or the fact that the administration's trying to use this crisis to issue a moratorium against all offshore drilling while lying about what the panel of experts actually recommended. Does the President not bother to think about the real-world results of such actions? It's like he lives in a fantasy world and just figures if he pushes the real world to look like the fantasy world, it'll actually happen and everything will work out.
 
I don't know what's worse- the criminal negligence or the fact that the administration's trying to use this crisis to issue a moratorium against all offshore drilling while lying about what the panel of experts actually recommended. Does the President not bother to think about the real-world results of such actions? It's like he lives in a fantasy world and just figures if he pushes the real world to look like the fantasy world, it'll actually happen and everything will work out.

but..... Obama Administration has a pro-oil drilling agenda.
 
but..... Obama Administration has a pro-oil drilling agenda.
Yes, he did announce an expansion of offshore drilling off some coasts back in March, but that doesn't square with what he's doing now. If Obama really is pro-drilling, perhaps Obama should tell Ken Salazar to stop talking like he is. However, from the guy who once swore to bankrupt coal plants and so badly wants cap and trade, I take this current action to be more indicative of his attitude than his March announcement.
 
More foreign oil. Yippey. Good work, President Genius.

WASHINGTON — Diamond Offshore announced Friday that its Ocean Endeavor drilling rig will leave the Gulf of Mexico and move to Egyptian waters immediately — making it the first to abandon the United States in the wake of the BP oil spill and a ban on deep-water drilling.

And the Ocean Endeavor's exodus probably won't be the last, according to oil industry officials and Gulf Coast leaders who warn that other companies eager to find work for the now-idled rigs are considering moving them outside the U.S.

Devon Energy Corp. had been leasing the Endeavor to drill in the same region of the Gulf as BP's leaking Macondo well, which has been gushing crude since a lethal blowout April 20.

But Diamond announced Friday it will lease the rig through June 30, 2011, to Cairo-based Burullus Gas Co., which plans to send the Endeavor to Egyptian waters immediately.

Devon is one of three companies that has cited the deep-water drilling ban in trying to ease out of contracts to lease Diamond rigs. Diamond, a drilling company, said it expects to make about $100 million from the deal, including a $31 million early termination fee it recovered from Devon.

Larry Dickerson, CEO of Houston-based Diamond, signaled that other of his company's rigs could be relocated, too.

"As a result of the uncertainties surrounding the offshore drilling moratorium, we are actively seeking international opportunities to keep our rigs fully employed," Dickerson said. "We greatly regret the loss of U.S. jobs that will result from this rig relocation."

It was unclear how many U.S. jobs could leave with the Ocean Endeavor, but typically more than 100 workers are on the rig at any given time, doing everything from drilling to cooking meals. Onshore, a network of businesses supplies the rigs with groceries, equipment, uniforms and drilling materials.

"It's not unusual for an energy service company to have 1,000 vendors that they buy from or purchase services from," noted Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands. As a result, Brady said, the economic damage from the moratorium stretches far and wide.
Fearing for investment

Brady and other oil-patch lawmakers have been pressing President Barack Obama to end the six-month moratorium he imposed on 33 deep-water projects May 27 after the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig that was drilling a well for BP.

Obama said the ban was needed to allow time for new safety standards to be implemented and a commission to investigate the cause of the April 20 blowout at BP's Macondo well.

Although the administration on Thursday lost its second bid to keep the ban in place while it appeals a federal court's decision to strike down the moratorium, federal regulators plan to try again with a revised version soon.

Dan Pickering, a financial analyst with Tudor, Pickering Holt & Co. Securities, said the legal uncertainties surrounding the ban - and the administration's plan to issue a new, revised moratorium - ensure that no companies will resume deep-water drilling in U.S. waters anytime soon.

"Are you really going to spend $5 million … getting ready to drill a well that someone would then probably block you from drilling?" Pickering said.
Lawmakers complain

Pickering added that prospects are high that a dozen rigs ultimately could leave the Gulf of Mexico because of the ban.

Brady said the rig owners are searching for revenue - even if it means relocating to get it.

"There are two types of rigs in the deep-water Gulf today: those that are leaving the country and those that want to, because with this moratorium hanging over their heads, they simply can't go back to work," Brady said. "I'm afraid this is the first of many rigs and many American jobs to leave the Gulf."

Once the rigs relocate, it could be a minimum of five to 10 years before they return, predicted Rep. Pete Olson, R-Sugar Land.

"We cannot afford to lose these jobs or the energy they provide," Olson said. "President Obama should allow this moratorium to remain lifted and let Americans get back to work."

During trading Friday, Diamond Offshore stock fell 86 cents - or 1.32 percent - to close at $64.40. It has fallen 29 percent from its closing price of $91.20 on April 20, the day the Deepwater Horizon exploded.

First rig sails away over deep-water drilling ban | Business | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
 
Oh boo hoo. Who cares? Let them go poison someone else.
 
I don't get the left. Do you want a strong economy or not? Do you want energy independence or not? Do you oppose sending jobs overseas or not? Enough with the incoherence.
 
I know you're joking and all, but on a serious note, wealthy countries are much better for the environment than poor countries. Despite that, it seems the environmental lobby's solution for all environmental ills is to impoverish us.
 
I know what you are trying to say, darkdog. If I get serious and tell you my stance, people would hoot and tell me to wear a tinfoil hat. Seriously.
 
I know you're joking and all, but on a serious note, wealthy countries are much better for the environment than poor countries. Despite that, it seems the environmental lobby's solution for all environmental ills is to impoverish us.

Right. Some $500 billion is spent annually for our imported oil that makes up 70% of our oil consumption in the U.S. Now, if we were to reverse that then that'd be a chunk of change flowing back into the economy while expanding jobs and increasing our energy independence. I agree. Obama's a "genius."
 
Back
Top