Is it ETHICAL to vacation in Haiti now?

Is it wrong to vacation in Haiti now?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 8 80.0%
  • Not at all

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • I don't know. It's tricky...

    Votes: 1 10.0%

  • Total voters
    10

Jiro

If You Know What I Mean
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
69,254
Reaction score
144
Haiti cruise stops draw ire, support
t1larg.labadee.courtesy.jpg


* Royal Caribbean cruise line takes heat for bringing tourists to Haiti after the quake
* Some people are outraged and disgusted at the idea of tourists frolicking near the disaster zone
* Experts: Reaction is natural, but people should consider the benefits of tourism for Haiti
* "The cruise ships aren't hurting anyone, in fact they're doing some good," ethics expert says

(CNN) -- When Catherine Jones recently booked a Royal Caribbean cruise that included a stop in Haiti, she never expected that her vacation would lead to deep soul searching and an emergency family meeting.

Jones, who lives in Hickory, North Carolina, is scheduled to start the trip at the beginning of next month -- a five-day getaway with her sister, who is in the Army and will go to Afghanistan in March, and their 87-year-old mother.

"We kind of discussed it: How can you sit there and say, 'Waiter, bring me a drink' while I'm on a private beach ... knowing that 100 miles away, people are dying," Jones said.

It's a debate that's been raging ever since Royal Caribbean resumed bringing vacationers to Haiti after last week's earthquake, which killed tens of thousands of people in and around the capital of Port-au-Prince.

Royal Caribbean deposits the tourists on the picturesque peninsula of Labadee, which was unaffected by the disaster and where the company has spent millions of dollars on what it calls its own "private paradise."

The area is heavily guarded, and visitors don't spend the night. But they enjoy Labadee's "pristine beaches, breathtaking scenery and spectacular water activities," according to Royal Caribbean's Web site.

Blogs and message boards have been full of outrage and disgust at the idea of tourists frolicking in the sun while bodies pile up in Port-au-Prince and quake survivors struggle to stay alive.

"Royal Caribbean is performing a sickening act to me by taking tourists to Haiti," wrote one poster on CNN's Connect the World blog.

"Having a beach party while people are dead, dying and suffering minutes away hardly makes me want to cruise that particular line," wrote another.

What's the right thing to do?

Experts in ethics and sustainable tourism said that kind of reaction is natural and understandable, but they urged people to look deeper at the issue and consider the benefits of tourism for Haiti now and beyond.

"Monies that are coming in as part of tourism are going to trickle down throughout the local economy at a time when the local people need it the most," said Brian Mullis, president of Sustainable Travel International, a nonprofit organization that promotes responsible travel.

Because visitors can have a positive effect during their stay, tourism should still be taking place in Haiti, even at this terrible time, Mullis said.

In a statement issued after the earthquake, the United Nations World Tourism Organization also weighed in, saying that "tourism can become a useful instrument for the necessary reconstruction process in Haiti."

History shows other examples of the importance of tourism to devastated areas: New York inviting visitors after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and New Orleans, Louisiana, appealing for tourist dollars after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Cruise line responds

Meanwhile, Royal Caribbean announced it would donate at least $1 million in humanitarian aid to Haiti and contribute all of the company's net revenue from Labadee to the relief effort.

The company's cruise ships are also delivering supplies -- including rice, dried beans, powdered milk, water and canned goods -- to the region.

Officials with the cruise line have been trying to reassure customers who may be having second thoughts about going on a trip that includes a stop in Haiti.

"It isn't better to replace a visit to Labadee (or for that matter, to stay on the ship while it's docked in Labadee) with a visit to another destination for a vacation," Adam Goldstein, president and CEO of Royal Caribbean International, wrote on his blog.

"Why? Because being on the island and generating economic activity for the straw market vendors, the hair-braiders and our 230 employees helps with relief while being somewhere else does not help."

Royal Caribbean says it has been one of Haiti's largest foreign investors for almost 30 years. The company spent $50 million developing Labadee, Goldstein told NPR.

Considering the ethics

Haiti's plight wouldn't improve if the cruise ships were diverted to another nearby island and pretended the disaster wasn't happening, agreed Chris MacDonald, a senior fellow at Duke University's Kenan Institute for Ethics and a philosophy professor at Saint Mary's University in Halifax, Nova Scotia. He also writes The Business Ethics Blog.

"The cruise ships aren't hurting anyone, in fact they're doing some good, they're bringing some help," MacDonald said.

People who believe it's disrespectful for tourists to enjoy themselves so close to a disaster zone should realize that the alternative of avoiding the area wouldn't be more respectful, MacDonald added.

The proximity sets off our gut reactions, but it doesn't seem to make any real moral difference, he said.

Mullis pointed out that the Dominican Republic -- Haiti's touristy neighbor on the island of Hispaniola -- is also close to the disaster but is doing business as usual.

"Anyone who doesn't feel a bit of awkwardness at the thought of beach volleyball in the north of Haiti right now doesn't have normal moral intuitions," MacDonald said.

"[But] the world needs to signal that Haiti isn't now just this fenced-off, quarantined place where you can never invest, you can never do business. Haiti is, to some tiny extent, still open for business. That's a hopeful message in a very, very grim situation."

It's a message Catherine Jones is taking to heart.

After much discussion, she and her family are going forward with their Royal Caribbean cruise that will include a stop in Labadee, Haiti. She won't be able to enjoy herself that day, Jones said, but she is hoping the money she spends will help the locals, and she is comforted by that thought.

"It's one of those situations that you can have a million views on it. But the fact is it happened, they depend on us for our money that we bring, I guess we'll go," Jones said.
The Royal Caribbean cruise line has been under fire for taking vacationers to earthquake-ravaged Haiti. But experts in ethics and sustainable tourism say the cruise stops will bring benefits to Haiti now and in the future.
 
I don't see this as an ethical question, so much as I see it as a question of safety. Why would you WANT to visit a place that is in devestation?
 
I would feel very weird when these people have families to worry about. I should be going over there to help them if I was going to vacation in Haiti at all.
 
If I read correctly, that pristine beach stop is owned by that cruise line. Makes me wonder if any of these dollars spent on that spot goes to Haiti?
 
I don't see this as an ethical question, so much as I see it as a question of safety. Why would you WANT to visit a place that is in devestation?

according to article - it's a heavily-guarded private island exclusively for tourists. I believe that this private island is separated from Haiti mainland.
 
I'm sure these people already planned ahead of time and paid ahead of time to take this vacation. Not going would be a lost of vacation time (if it is very difficult to make it up). Either way, I'm sure people from Haiti who work for them do need to keep their employment.
 
In that case, I say to each his own. But, I wouldn't do it.

I agree. It's an unfortunately unforeseeable event. and I understand that people have already planned in advance and this trip is expensive. I hold no ill-judgment against them but I have a morbid curiosity and I'd like to see how ya'all feel about it.

It is nice if Royal Caribbean company would be understanding enough to refund their money if the tourists choose to opt out of it due to Haiti tragedy.

For me - I would ask for a refund but I don't go on cruise ship anyway.
 
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8130/4.5.0.89 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/106)

If it is not in the heart of the devastation. It should be ok. Tourism brings much needed money to Haiti.
 
if i am going there then my clothes and passport will be gone in one second due to the situation what they had been through. other time.
 
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8130/4.5.0.89 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/106)

If it is not in the heart of the devastation. It should be ok. Tourism brings much needed money to Haiti.

The way I understand it, the cruise line operates that small beach spot. Other than that cruise line maybe paying Haiti a few dollars for land use that is fenced in and guarded, I don't see how tourist dollars help Haiti.
 
The way I understand it, the cruise line operates that small beach spot. Other than that cruise line maybe paying Haiti a few dollars for land use that is fenced in and guarded, I don't see how tourist dollars help Haiti.

people can venture around in Haiti outside the guarded area. Remember - your American dollar is worth $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ much than their currency. After all.... it's the poorest country in this hemisphere. They buy some local clothes, jewelries, etc.
 
I agree. It's an unfortunately unforeseeable event. and I understand that people have already planned in advance and this trip is expensive. I hold no ill-judgment against them but I have a morbid curiosity and I'd like to see how ya'all feel about it.

It is nice if Royal Caribbean company would be understanding enough to refund their money if the tourists choose to opt out of it due to Haiti tragedy.

For me - I would ask for a refund but I don't go on cruise ship anyway.

Another option would be to change the itinerary of the cruise. They do this in cases of approaching hurricanes, and they often do it "on the fly". I don't see why this isn't done in cases like this, but I guess money talks? The more I think about it, the more it kinda digusts me that someone with a fat wallet would be lounging on a private beach 100 miles from a devestated area.
 
Reading the article from the OP. The beach area is about 100 miles away from the devastation.
 
Reading the article from the OP. The beach area is about 100 miles away from the devastation.

Yeah, that's another reason why I don't think those tourist dollars go that appreciably far.
 
Yeah, that's another reason why I don't think those tourist dollars go that appreciably far.

The vendors have to pay tax... which goes to Haiti government... which goes to Port-au-Prince. Right? :hmm:

If I remember correctly - the tourist stores in Cuba has to pay 50% (or more) tax if they receive foreign customers but that store has to be registered and approved by Cuban government to do tourist business. That's quite a hefty $$$ to Cuban government. Again - my memory's rusty on that fact.
 
The vendors have to pay tax... which goes to Haiti government... which goes to Port-au-Prince. Right? :hmm:

If I remember correctly - the tourist stores in Cuba has to pay 50% (or more) tax if they receive foreign customers but that store has to be registered and approved by Cuban government to do tourist business. That's quite a hefty $$$ to Cuban government. Again - my memory's rusty on that fact.

Yeah, to your first sentence but look at Haiti from a historical point of view. It seems they have always been backward.

Don't quote me on this but I have a vague recollection that Haiti's being backward dates back to the early 1900's and America's imperialism in that region. Anyone care to look that up? Might give us some fodder for discussion in another direction.
 
Back
Top