- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,254
- Reaction score
- 144
I thought so. just like a typical response from WBC people.
Neither does the US Military. That is what military tribunals are for. If a soldier is charged with murder, they are given a fair trial.
I consider murder to be the same thing as "collateral damage." I see no difference between dropping a bomb on an Iraqi children's hospital in error, or willfully killing unarmed civilians like the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. An apology and "deepest regret" doesn't mean anything to corpses.
I understand how you feel and I share some of those sentiments myself. Murder is never justifiable.
However, it is my understanding that we are fighting an enemy that is using innocent civilians as human shields. The difference is, the US military takes every precaution available to prevent putting innocent lives in harms way.
We have lived to see many protests happening all across the middle eastern nations. Apparently enough people have had it with their tyrannical leaders and want to be free and rid of them.
Freedom is contagious.
I understand how you feel and I share some of those sentiments myself. Murder is never justifiable.
However, it is my understanding that we are fighting an enemy that is using innocent civilians as human shields. The difference is, the US military takes every precaution available to prevent putting innocent lives in harms way.
I don't think we can know the numbers for sure, but I would wager that the percentage of innocents killed as a result of being used as human shields is far less than the amount who die as a result of indiscriminate bombing and weapons fire, as well as plain human error. I think it's just really convenient for the military to claim that their innocent victims were being used as human shields because it somehow makes people feel less sympathetic? Isn't that blaming the victim? If anything, it makes it worse to me.
Watch the documentary Restrapo and pay attention to the way the officers talk to the local Afghans after mistakenly killing two teenagers. Doesn't show much concern for innocent life, nor does it show a whole lot of precaution being used.
I don't think we can know the numbers for sure, but I would wager that the percentage of innocents killed as a result of being used as human shields is far less than the amount who die as a result of indiscriminate bombing and weapons fire, as well as plain human error. I think it's just really convenient for the military to claim that their innocent victims were being used as human shields because it somehow makes people feel less sympathetic? Isn't that blaming the victim? If anything, it makes it worse to me.
Watch the documentary Restrapo and pay attention to the way the officers talk to the local Afghans after mistakenly killing two teenagers. Doesn't show much concern for innocent life, nor does it show a whole lot of precaution being used.
Does anyone care about the hundreds of thousands of innocent Afghani and Iraqi children, women, and men who have died as a result of our blind rage in pursuing the perpetrators of terrorism?
Human life is important no matter what. I am sorry for the life lost in NYC 10 years ago, but I think we should be thinking about a lot of other incidents and unfortunates before we go treating this day like it's the only thing that matters in the history of the world.