Hitler this, Hitler that

I think people are fascinated by him because he was one person who somehow had so much power to pull off the murder of thousands of people for a stupid reason.

It is sickening. I think it is the power that the people are fascinated with.
 
shel90 said:
I think people are fascinated by him because he was one person who somehow had so much power to pull off the murder of thousands of people for a stupid reason.

It is sickening. I think it is the power that the people are fascinated with.
Click to expand...

Thousands? Ha, nope. It was millions. Around 75-90 million. As Joseph Stalin once said: "One death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic."


Stupid? Dunno. As my one of my friends grimly observed, if it wasn't for Nazis (Soviets were even worse), the rest of Europe would have been taken over by Bolsheviks. So Europe wasn't a communistic state since then...

Example: my Netherlander friend said in an argument against Americans' opinion online, "Bullshit, if it weren't for the majority of Germany's panzer divisions fighting off the Soviet forces in the east, you in the west would of been whiped off the beaches like a shitstain."


____________________________

To complicate the matter further, I want to add something from deaftears' #5 post in the introduction part of the book.

'The manufactured animosity between the democracies of the West and the communism of the East produced continuous tension from 1918 through the end of the twentieth century. But it threatened to get out of hand. Some researchers believe that the threat of worldwide communist socialism caused these globalists to turn to German Nationalists. They funded the rise of National Socialism in Germany and saw an armed Greater Germany as a barrier to communism in Europe. National Socialism was a form of socialism almost indistinguishable from communism, only it was confined within national geographic boundaries. Under National Socialism, the globalists could pit the various nations against each other. But following Germany’s military successes in Poland, the Low Countries, and France, these globalists realized they faced the same problem they had with the communists. A total German victory would result in a worldwide National Socialist system unable to produce the tensions and conflicts necessary for maximizing profit and control. They also may have feared that Stalin’s Soviet Union was about to launch an attack on Western Europe. Only Hitler’s Germany had the strength to prevent this.'

But anyways, I hope you aren't bored to death, lol, I'm just drunk swimming in the wine right now, I better end this lengthy post.
 
Lukin said:
Thousands? Ha, nope. It was millions. Around 75-90 million. As Joseph Stalin once said: "One death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic."


Stupid? Dunno. As my one of my friends grimly observed, if it wasn't for Nazis (Soviets were even worse), the rest of Europe would have been taken over by Bolsheviks. So Europe wasn't a communistic state since then...

Example: my Netherlander friend said in an argument against Americans' opinion online, "Bullshit, if it weren't for the majority of Germany's panzer divisions fighting off the Soviet forces in the east, you in the west would of been whiped off the beaches like a shitstain."


____________________________

To complicate the matter further, I want to add something from deaftears' #5 post in the introduction part of the book.

'The manufactured animosity between the democracies of the West and the communism of the East produced continuous tension from 1918 through the end of the twentieth century. But it threatened to get out of hand. Some researchers believe that the threat of worldwide communist socialism caused these globalists to turn to German Nationalists. They funded the rise of National Socialism in Germany and saw an armed Greater Germany as a barrier to communism in Europe. National Socialism was a form of socialism almost indistinguishable from communism, only it was confined within national geographic boundaries. Under National Socialism, the globalists could pit the various nations against each other. But following Germany’s military successes in Poland, the Low Countries, and France, these globalists realized they faced the same problem they had with the communists. A total German victory would result in a worldwide National Socialist system unable to produce the tensions and conflicts necessary for maximizing profit and control. They also may have feared that Stalin’s Soviet Union was about to launch an attack on Western Europe. Only Hitler’s Germany had the strength to prevent this.'

But anyways, I hope you aren't bored to death, lol, I'm just drunk swimming in the wine right now, I better end this lengthy post.
Click to expand...

I orgninally was right..it was in the millions but I wasnt sure and I didnt feel like googling it.

It is really stupid. Killing all these innocent people for politics. Nice.
 
shel90 said:
I orgninally was right..it was in the millions but I wasnt sure and I didnt feel like googling it.

It is really stupid. Killing all these innocent people for politics. Nice.
Click to expand...

Haha, innocent... Wait till you hear about Stalinist policy of purges during 1930s, it wasn't even during WWII, he killed his people more than enemies, some 25 million -I didn't even count the Bolshevik repression in post-revolution Russia of 1918, causalities (sp?) was some 50 times the WWI level.
 
I read about hitler a lot as a teen. It was really something when he controled all of europe and lots of russia. If he let thhe jewish people alone I think we would be speaking german now
 
If people understood that Obama cut a deal to cover up the AIDS Onslaught in return for power that Hitler comparison might get more airplay.
 
Let me edit that one for you.

deaftears said:
If people understood that Obama cut a deal to cover up the AIDS Onslaught in return for perversion that Hitler comparison might get more foreplay.
Click to expand...

OK, that makes a lot sense.
 
Back
Top