GOP's Snowe to vote for Senate panel's health care bill

Status
Not open for further replies.

jillio

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
60,077
Reaction score
22
CNN
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Health care reform advocates got a major boost Tuesday as Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe, a key GOP moderate, announced she will vote for the Senate Finance Committee's $829 billion health care bill.

The Democratic leadership in both legislative chambers soon will work to meld health care legislation.
Snowe, one of the senators in the bipartisan "Gang of Six" that initially negotiated the committee's bill, has been considered one of the few GOP senators likely to support a bill emerging from the Democratic-controlled Congress.

The Finance Committee's upcoming vote -- expected Tuesday -- represents a pivotal step forward in the contentious health care debate. The committee, with 13 Democrats and 10 Republicans, is the last of five congressional panels to consider health care legislation before debate begins in the full House and Senate.

"People do have concerns about what we will do with reform, but at the same time they want us to continue working -- and that is what my vote to approve this bill out of committee represents," Snowe said during the committee's final deliberations on the measure.

"Is this bill all that I would want? Far from it. Is it all that it can be? No. But when history calls, history calls. And I happen to think that the consequences of inaction dictate the urgency of Congress (taking) every opportunity to demonstrate its capacity to solve the monumental issues of our time."

Once the Finance Committee clears the bill, the focus will quickly shift to the closed doors of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's office.

The Nevada Democrat must merge the conservative-leaning Finance Committee legislation with a more liberally drawn bill approved by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.

The primary difference between the Finance Committee bill and the health committee legislation involves a government-run insurance company -- the public option.

The health committee bill provides for a robust public option designed to compete head-on with insurance companies and force them to rein in costs.

The Finance Committee ditched the public option in favor of nongovernment-run health care co-ops, a nod to conservative Democrats and Republicans who fear a government takeover of the health care system.

Other key differences include whether employers should be forced to provide health insurance to their employees and how generous government subsides should be to assist low- and middle-income people to pay for health insurance.

Reid's goal is to emerge with a single bill that can win at least 60 votes in the Senate, meet President Obama's ambitious promise to change dramatically the way health care is paid for and provided, and cost no more than $900 billion over the next 10 years. Senate aides expect that effort to take a couple of weeks.


Joining Reid in the decision-making will be Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana, the Finance Committee chairman; Sens. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and Tom Harkin of Iowa, senior Democrats on the health committee; and Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff.

Other key players are likely to weigh in, most notably Snowe, a centrist long considered as the Democrats' best hope for getting GOP support.

Republican leaders, who have criticized the bill for its size and scope, won't be involved. One senior Republican leadership aide recently quipped that she would be in her office with her feet on her desk during the talks because she sure wasn't going to be invited in to offer suggestions.

Then the Senate must find common ground with the House of Representatives, and so far there appears to be little -- House Democrats have said they won't pass a bill that doesn't include a public option.

Leaders in the House have been meeting over the past months in an effort to merge three bills passed out of committees and bring down projected costs. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, has said she expects a final version for consideration by the full chamber soon, but she hasn't provided a specific timetable.

In general, both parties agree on major aspects in overhauling health care, among them capping consumers' annual out-of-pocket expenses for health care and halting insurance company practices of denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. They also agree on creating incentives for preventive health care to help lower overall costs.

The Democratic leadership in both chambers want to bring liberals, progressives and conservatives in the party together to use its majority in both chambers to pass a bill this year.

In the Senate, Reid needs 60 votes to overcome a possible Republican filibuster. There are 60 seats in the Democrats' Senate caucus, but some independents or moderates are unlikely to support a public option or some of the more costly overhaul plans.

Reid could implement a legislative option known as reconciliation, which would allow Democrats to pass a bill with 50 votes instead of 60. However, Republicans have promised a "minor revolution," in the words of GOP Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, if Democrats resort to that rarely used tactic.

Snowe has proposed a possible compromise: a "trigger" mechanism that would create a public option in the future if specific thresholds for expanded coverage and lower costs are not met. The trigger has yet to be included in any proposal.

GOP's Snowe to vote for Senate panel's health care bill - CNN.com

Lets hope more Republicans follow Snowe's example.
 
Go Swone.... She is most important moderate republican. :)
 
Nice to see a repub acting responsibly.
There is another repub lining up now....in todays news.
No dammit....I'm not playing the provide your source and facts game. I am not in college. lol
And it seems to have become a big intellectual chessgame. Just creating more ego thumping. This is not a court of law. Looks like lawyer battles sometimes. Trying to manipulate definitions.
"define the word 'if' please. etc.
Objection, your honor. lol
SUSTAINED!!!!
 
Snowe has always been a liberal RINO. Nothing new.

She left herself an "out" if things go badly on this legislation. She said that her recent vote isn't a guarantee of a future vote. She's not 100% behind this plan.
 
I can just see it now....lobbyists waiting in the wings, ready to pounce on this legislation to a point its unrecognizable. Let's hope the leaders minimize this....
 
....I'm not playing the provide your source and facts game....
It's not a game. It's common courtesy AND it's AD rules. The rules are supposed to apply equally to everyone.
 
Snowe has always been a liberal RINO. Nothing new.

She left herself an "out" if things go badly on this legislation. She said that her recent vote isn't a guarantee of a future vote. She's not 100% behind this plan.

She's moderate republican to me since she is fiscal conservative that against on very very high spending that liberal want.
 
Oh bunk.....perhaps if I get into a long running debate battle.....then it might make sense.....but if I am just making general chat and trying to be pleasant.......and staying out of intellectaul chessgames.....silly stuff.
general conversation.perhaps if someone request it.....but the'request' I see are parts of the 'fights' I see here.
Call it hearsay....again....I am not in a court of law....those who want to play lawyer games can apply those rules to themselves I'm not going to allow myself to become anal here. And speaking of common courtesy....it is common courtesy to not turn everything in a conversation into an anal slugfest. simple stuff.

It's not a game. It's common courtesy AND it's AD rules. The rules are supposed to apply equally to everyone.
 
Oh bunk.....perhaps if I get into a long running debate battle.....then it might make sense.....but if I am just making general chat and trying to be pleasant.......and staying out of intellectaul chessgames.....silly stuff.
general conversation.perhaps if someone request it.....but the'request' I see are parts of the 'fights' I see here.
Call it hearsay....again....I am not in a court of law....those who want to play lawyer games can apply those rules to themselves I'm not going to allow myself to become anal here.

:rofl: :laugh2::rofl2:

The hypocrisy! Every single word reeks of hypocrisy! :laugh2:

:lol::rofl:
 
Says you.
Not even curious what your point is. I don't make demands for links.
Your statement doesn't make sense.
 
Two female republicans making the difference.
Just goes to show you how woman can affect the balance of power in politics. It took women to make the difference in health care. Figures.
Have to admire any republican who can use thier own brain instead of robotically voting along the party line. Brains and guts to defy the party demanding loyalty. You see this kind of thing from dems but very rarely from repubs. Very telling. And is my problem with thier party. Is a form of dictatorship in my book. Party dictatorship.
Kudos to Snowe and Collins. Women making a difference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top