Former Climate Research Unit chief: Hiding data is a critical part of science!

kokonut

New Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
15,855
Reaction score
2
You know, the IPCC? The very panel of "climate experts" and policy makers that pusher Al Gore, the UN, Obama and everybody else who tried to use the CRU so called climate data to dupe, er, sell the global warming theory (it's a theory, not a fact folks) to mere commoners? CRU, as in Climategate?

But yesterday Professor Jones – in his first public appearance since the scandal broke – denied manipulating the figures.

Looking pale and clasping his shaking hands in front of him, he told MPs: ‘I have obviously written some pretty awful emails.’

He admitted withholding data about global temperatures but said the information was publicly available from American websites.

And he claimed it was not ’standard practice’ to release data and computer models so other scientists could check and challenge research.

‘I don’t think there is anything in those emails that really supports any view that I, or the CRU, have been trying to pervert the peer review process in any way,’ he said.
Climategate professor Phil Jones admits sending 'pretty awful emails' | Mail Online

Not standard practice? If any who is familiar with how peer-review process works in science is that data are to be made open and available so that it can be tested to see whether such scientific claims measure up or not. Jones purposely made sure that CRU perverts the peer-review process. A sign that what this whole global warming thing was a planned hoax from the beginning.

And then we have the Institute of Physics who said this last week, note the bolded words:

2. The CRU e-mails as published on the internet provide prima facie evidence of determined and co-ordinated refusals to comply with honourable scientific traditions and freedom of information law. The principle that scientists should be willing to expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by others, which requires the open exchange of data, procedures and materials, is vital. The lack of compliance has been confirmed by the findings of the Information Commissioner. This extends well beyond the CRU itself – most of the e-mails were exchanged with researchers in a number of other international institutions who are also involved in the formulation of the IPCC’s conclusions on climate change. …

4. The second category relating to proxy reconstructions are the basis for the conclusion that 20th century warming is unprecedented. Published reconstructions may represent only a part of the raw data available and may be sensitive to the choices made and the statistical techniques used. Different choices, omissions or statistical processes may lead to different conclusions. This possibility was evidently the reason behind some of the (rejected) requests for further information.
Uncorrected Evidence 39

Now, we have evidence that Jones wasn’t interested in conducting science properly at all. He was more interested in generating propaganda rather than to get the truth and feed and dupe commoners who have no idea about climate science. All done in order to help an agenda set forth by the likes of Al Gore, Michael Mann, Jones and the rest of the guilty party in lieu of the govt for this whole cap and trade scheme just to make our lives even more miserable.

I hope the IPCC fails. The CRU disbanded, closed forever.
 
From the country that gave us Sir Isaac Newton, this guy is truly a disgrace.
 
Yep.

False claims about the Himalayan glaciers.
False claims about rising water.
False claims about increasing number of hurricanes and intensities.
False claims about the Amazon forest.
Bad data.
Use of non-peer review reports.
Lack of transparency for other scientists to get their hands on these scientific data results.
Lying to the public.
Intimidating the public who don't agree with their global warming theory by calling them 'deniers' and such bringing up the Holocaust connotation.
Intimidate or stall others from accepting research articles in a peer review process that counters global warming theory claims.
The list goes on and on.

The biggest hoax ever perpetrated on human kind across the globe.

Like I said, the implosion continues.
 
so what are they trying to do? kill us all and destroy the world? Talk about irresponsibility.
 
Reckless use of power. Al Gore's Noble Peace prize ought to be returned and him investigated for complicity in helping perpetuate a false science.
 
All done in order to help an agenda set forth by the likes of Al Gore, Michael Mann, Jones and the rest of the guilty party in lieu of the govt for this whole cap and trade scheme just to make our lives even more miserable.

I hope the IPCC fails. The CRU disbanded, closed forever.

Nice try. IPCC is still strong.

"An American scientist accused of manipulating research findings on climate science was cleared of that charge by his university on Thursday, the latest in a string of reports to find little substance in the allegations known as Climategate."

"Two inquiries in Britain have largely exonerated the scientists there who were caught up in Climategate, though one report did offer minor criticism of statistical techniques."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/science/earth/02climate.html?_r=1&hp

It's done. It's been investigated and nothing was found illegally or data altered.

Get over with it, you lose.
 
O SNAP netrox. You just won a round against Bob Weavvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! I think it's TKO!!!!!!!

t8xnyp.jpg
 
Back
Top