diehardbiker
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2004
- Messages
- 16,188
- Reaction score
- 16
Nm
I disagree. You know, it wasn't too long ago banks didn't charge fees for keeping money in a bank, you actually made money by keeping it there. Cable also has a monopoly on the market and is charging because consumers have no choice. One town over from me, for the same services, cable is 1/3 of the cost it is in my town due to regulation. Cable had the ability not too long ago of shutting off ALL NFL games if you didn't buy a certain package for $30 more a month. That same NFL game was free before cable got involved. Maybe you pay reasonable rates were you are, but here $80 a month just for TV not including internet or phone is a little high in my opinion.
Boston just recently gained the power to regulate it again(of course cable is appealing the decision):
Boston regains power to regulate basic cable | News | CED Magazine - Communications, Engineering and Design Magazine
Totally agree. It's just ridiculous. before I left the husband we had HD cable and HBO, internet and digital phone service, and the bill was close to $170 a month. Don't even get me started on the fees for cell phone service. I can't even wrap my head around any justifications for why cable and cell phone service is so ridiculously high. When I moved out I asked my kids, okay, do you want guys want cable or to keep your cell phones, they picked their phones so we stream netfliks. Internet access $29.99, netfliks $8, so now I pay less than $40. This is catching on more and more, they are going to have to change things.
What's OTA?
Sports channels' price is high. ESPN tops the list of the most expensive cable networks, charging subscribers about $5.00 a month; the two next most expensive channels.
![]()
If You Don't Watch Sports, TV Is a Huge Rip-Off (So, How Do We Fix It?) - Yahoo! Finance