Economists: Recession to end in 2009

Status
Not open for further replies.

jillio

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
60,077
Reaction score
22
A recovery in the second half of this year will be 'moderate,' according to a report from the National Association for Business Economics.


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The end of the recession is in sight, according to a new survey of leading economists.

While the economy is showing signs of stabilizing, the recovery will be more moderate than is typical following a severe downturn, said the National Association for Business Economics Outlook in a report released Wednesday.

The panel of 45 economists said it expects economic growth will rebound in the second half of 2009. However, the group still expects to see a decline in second-quarter economic activity.

0:00 /03:11Recovery? Not so fast
"The good news is that the NABE panel expects economic growth to turn positive in the second half of this year, with the pace of job losses narrowing sharply over the remainder of this year and employment turning up in early 2010," said NABE president Chris Varvares in a written statement.

Almost three out of four survey respondents expect the recession will end by the third quarter of 2009, the report said.

But 19% predicted that a turnaround won't come until the fourth quarter, and 7% said it may not come until early 2010. None of the panelists expected the recession to continue past the first quarter of next year.

0:00 /02:59How to spot a recovery
GDP: The report predicted a 1.8% decline in real GDP in the second quarter of 2009, bringing the total year-to-date decrease to 3.7%. That's the biggest drop since 1957-1958, the report said.

Still, "a modest second-half rebound in real GDP is expected," the report said, with economic growth turning positive in the third quarter. Real GDP growth over the second half of 2009 is expected to average 1.2%, which is well below average, the report said.

"Growth in 2010 is slated for a return to near its historical trend," the report said, predicting a 2.7% year-over-year increase. The NABE's February outlook had predicted a 3.1% uptick.

0:00 /5:18Call him 'Dr. Realistic'
Jobs: The panel forecast a total of 4.5 million jobs lost in 2009, pushing the unemployment rate to 9.8%. Modest gains in 2010 will reduce the rate to 9.3% by year's end, the report predicted.

Separate reports this month showed the unemployment rate is currently down in 21 states and stands at 8.9% nationally.

Deficit: Government spending "will provide vital support to the economy," and will be the only expenditure sector to grow in 2009, the report said.

But that spending will help push the federal deficit to a record-high $1.7 trillion in the 2009 fiscal year, before falling slightly to $1.4 trillion in fiscal 2010.

Housing: New and existing home sales are close to their lows, with 72% of NABE panelists expecting sales to hit bottom by the middle of 2009. More than 60% of those surveyed said housing starts would also bottom out at the same time.

The panelists were split on the issue of when home prices will hit their lows: 30% said it would happen by the third quarter of 2009; 30% said the fourth quarter; and 40% said declines will continue into 2010 or later. The median prediction is that home prices will rise 1% in 2010, the report said.

0:00 /2:48Rebuilding housing?
Spending: Widespread job losses and weak income growth have reduced consumer spending and boosted the personal savings rate, the report said. The savings rate has seen two consecutive quarters of sharp increases, holding above 4% through March. More than 70% of the panelists expect "more thrifty behavior is here to stay, at least for the next five years," the report said.

Credit: Obtaining long-term and short-term financing is still difficult, which poses a risk to the economy, but 90% of respondents said actions from the Federal Reserve have helped to ease the credit crunch.

Five-year outlook: More than half of the NABE economists said they expected potential growth of the U.S. economy over the next five years to be between 2% and 2.5%; 37% of respondents forecast growth between 2.5% and 3%, while 7% of the panelists said growth will be higher than 3%.


Economic growth will rebound in the second half of 2009 - May. 27, 2009
 
Last edited:
At least this proves there is a light at the end of the tunnel which is what Obama said in one of his most recent speeches. I'm glad to hear this because our country has been in turmoil for such a long time and we desperately need some good news to help restore the confidence and faith Americans have in our President.
 
It's not because of Obama alone, also same with around global has help to get out of recession, such as G8 summit and federal bailout that passed in last Nov by congress and signed by Bush too.

It sounds like recession is tends to be bad as in early 80's instead of 1930's.
 
The recession we currently have is far worse than what we experienced in 1980.

Agreed. And the fact of the matter is, we are beginning to see a turn around. If we weren't it would certainly be labeled "ALL OBAMA"S FAULT!" Yet he isn't supposed to have any credit for the fact that it has begun a turnaround under his leadership.
 
Agreed. And the fact of the matter is, we are beginning to see a turn around.

Exactly.

Unfortunately, some Republicans choose to be blinded by their own ignorance and refuse to accept the fact that Obama is making positive change in America like he promised in his campaign.
 
Just because we did not bottom out into another Great Depression does not mean the economic climate was not in crisis.
 
Obama's spending is actually to save the jobs for anyone who work for government, including education, law enforcement, transportation and others, it does allow to create jobs but there's still small laid off at government job.

Without spending, many of government jobs could be laid off and just similar to recession in 2001 that cause more government jobs, including teachers to laid off since Bush don't make any spending to save the job at this time.
 
Agreed. And the fact of the matter is, we are beginning to see a turn around. If we weren't it would certainly be labeled "ALL OBAMA"S FAULT!" Yet he isn't supposed to have any credit for the fact that it has begun a turnaround under his leadership.

:gpost: :gpost:
 
That's an unfair comparison. You're comparing apples to oranges or in other words, a 50 year time span to an 8 year time span.

I don't understand about your post.

Economy has been better during Bush admin for short time, from 2003 until 2007 then recession has caused again.
 
Economy has been better during Bush admin for short time, from 2003 until 2007 then recession has caused again.

If the status quo was doing such a good job of improving our economy, why did Americans vote for Obama and feel that it was time for change?
 
If the status quo was doing such a good job of improving our economy, why did Americans vote for Obama and feel that it was time for change?

Economy isn't only one of reason, Iraq war is one of biggest reason that Americans has got away from Bush and republicans, that's same with 2006 election, many republican has lost the seat in congress. Most of them don't want repeat of mistake by Bush since McCain agrees with 90% of Bush's plan.

Poor economy has been blamed by many factors.

I don't support McCain or Huckabee, they don't meet quality that I need.
 
Economy isn't only one of reason, Iraq war is one of biggest reason that Americans has got away from Bush and republicans, that's same with 2006 election, many republican has lost the seat in congress. Most of them don't want repeat of mistake by Bush since McCain agrees with 90% of Bush.

Poor economy has been blamed by many factors.

I don't support McCain or Huckabee, they don't meet quality that I need.

But this thread isn't about Iraq.
 
If the status quo was doing such a good job of improving our economy, why did Americans vote for Obama and feel that it was time for change?

If I am not mistaken, the polls just before the election indicated that the economy was the number one concern of voters. The Iraq war was second.
 
If I am not mistaken, the polls just before the election indicated that the economy was the number one concern of voters. The Iraq war was second.

Exactly. And if I remember correctly, Obama scored in the 90th percentile when it came to the confidence Americans had in his ability to improve the economy.
 
But this thread isn't about Iraq.

I still don't understand about what you are talking.

I'm studied in economy and have alot of research about how economy works, signal of recession require negative growth in GDP but in 2003 until 2007, economy was in good shape, beside of oil crisis and real estate situation, such as mortgage subprime but it's still not good as in 90's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top