Declaring war on newborns.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I already read about that last weekend (I think?). I just want to point out of something. Holland is actually allows it...
 
As someone nicely put his quote, "What disqualifies a baby from personhood?"

If someone said, "it's still not a human yet," then, in what way is a baby is not a human? If someone said, "But a child is a human, and a baby is not," (or, this, [Person A] is and [Person B] is not) then, in what way is a baby not human?"

Maybe I can't understand what good requirements to be qualified. Well, I wouldn't surprise if children and/or seniors is/are next... since young and old are so much nag to crazy and extreme childfree people. Sighs.
 
Last edited:
uh.... I'm confused. what's there to discuss about? this silly article is nothing but a comical hyperbole. there's nothing to discuss about this since laws have already been in place for this. it's called "murder".

"After-Birth Abortion"?
tumblr_lozdsb0bKx1qbnd1c.gif


somebody's got way too much time on their hands to even read this article in the first place and to contemplate further about it.
 
Jiro said:
uh.... I'm confused. what's there to discuss about? this silly article is nothing but a comical hyperbole.

there's nothing to discuss about this since laws have already been in place for this.
Click to expand...

aw... you aren't alone.
 
kokonut said:
Yep. It's the slippery slope and who say it wouldn't stop supposing they find out the baby is born deaf or blind?
Click to expand...

I think you're on slippery slope to lollipop land.
 
I remember when Peter Singer came out with his ethical views on after birth abortion. Steve Forbes yanked his funding of Princeton when they hired Singer.
 
Steinhauer said:
I remember when Peter Singer came out with his ethical views on after birth abortion. Steve Forbes yanked his funding of Princeton when they hired Singer.
Click to expand...

"After birth abortion" is an euphemism for legalized killing an innocent person.
 
kokonut said:
"After birth abortion" is an euphemism for legalized killing an innocent person.
Click to expand...

Peter Singer said it was only "ok" if the baby was handicapped.

In other words, if the baby was not handicapped - he considered it a person. With a handicap - no, no, it's an untermenschen.

Someone needs their head stomped. Just saying. that would probably be more "ethical" than anything he has ever written.
 
In some places it is not even necessary to be born "defective" and/or "handicap", just be born the wrong gender and the baby is "disposed". Slippery slope? That has already begun as doctors are running test on less than 5 month fetus and if the woman finds a reason from these test to do so, she will "dispose" of her baby.
 
This is the awful, yet in some minds logical, direction to go as human life is devalued.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top