Deaf Education Bill Vetoed

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,160
Reaction score
7
Deaf Education Bill Vetoed | KSFY.com - Your Source for News, Sports, Weather, and Community Events Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104 | Local & Regional News

15-year-old Jorden Curren of Flandreau is already busy planning for college with his mom Deanne.

Jorden is almost completely deaf and attends the South Dakota School for the Deaf in Sioux Falls. Even though he lives out of town, he'd like to attend the school full-time. He said, "But there's no English professor, no math teacher, no reading teacher that's available."

House Bill 1242 would have amended existing laws to ensure deaf and hard of hearing kids get the same attention as public schools, but South Dakota Governor Mike Rounds vetoed the bill Friday. In a letter to the Speaker, he wrote, "This bill muddies responsibility for funding, supervising, and providing special education services, and, in so doing, it conflicts with the requirements of federal law."

It's author, Democratic representative Dan Ahlers of Dell Rapids doesn't see it that way. He says the bill would use the same standard public schools use to specifically describe it's educational opportunities. He said, "So that's really a contradiction when they say it interferes with the federal funding since our schools, public schools receive that same-type of funding for schools with disabilities."

Deanne says many parents are frustrated. She said, "We're denying these children the ability to have an appropriate education because of one entity and the state just doesn't feel like they want to provide it."
 
Deaf Education Bill Vetoed | KSFY.com - Your Source for News, Sports, Weather, and Community Events Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104 | Local & Regional News

15-year-old Jorden Curren of Flandreau is already busy planning for college with his mom Deanne.

Jorden is almost completely deaf and attends the South Dakota School for the Deaf in Sioux Falls. Even though he lives out of town, he'd like to attend the school full-time. He said, "But there's no English professor, no math teacher, no reading teacher that's available."

House Bill 1242 would have amended existing laws to ensure deaf and hard of hearing kids get the same attention as public schools, but South Dakota Governor Mike Rounds vetoed the bill Friday. In a letter to the Speaker, he wrote, "This bill muddies responsibility for funding, supervising, and providing special education services, and, in so doing, it conflicts with the requirements of federal law."

It's author, Democratic representative Dan Ahlers of Dell Rapids doesn't see it that way. He says the bill would use the same standard public schools use to specifically describe it's educational opportunities. He said, "So that's really a contradiction when they say it interferes with the federal funding since our schools, public schools receive that same-type of funding for schools with disabilities."

Deanne says many parents are frustrated. She said, "We're denying these children the ability to have an appropriate education because of one entity and the state just doesn't feel like they want to provide it."

Man, I'm glad I don't live in South Dakota! Feel sorry for those families with deaf children that do.
 
Sound like Governor Arnold from California wants to close the Fresno Deaf Residential School in order to save money. South Dakota is trying to save money as an excuse to not have the Deaf students with disabilities to attend the Deaf school to get an Deaf education. What a Cop Out or for a lack of a better word HOGWASH!!! I really don't know what is going on over there in South Dakota. I have never travel over there much at all even it is right next door to Minnesota where I grew up. **sigh** We are living in a very oppressive world and we have to fight for our right as Deaf individuals. :pissed:
 
What? It was actually vetoed?

Somebody need a good slap in the face.
 
I know! And the thing is.............it's such a "feel good" move to claim that if res schools are closed, then all dhh kids will get good services etc. I was reading some newsletters from a father, who had two blind/low vision sons. They started off in Nebraska. They closed the School for the Blind. The father was told "oh they'll get a good education" But the thing is their sped services consisted of an every six month meeting with a Teacher of the Blind/low vision." They moved to Kentucky so that their boys could attend the School for the blind.
I think that it's better to consolidate services at a central location.
 
Oh and, I have to say that the only population of "classicly" disabled students, that can be VERY easily integrated into a mainstream classroom, are kids with mobilty/orthapedic issues. They can get supplemental stuff, very easily though an organization such as United Cerebal Palsy etc.
 
No slappin in the face as you can go to Jail for assault. Just say somebody need a smack on the back of their head and I could have gone to jail for assault, too. lol :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
Back
Top