Crossdressers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
DoofusMama said:
what about boys wearing pink clothes..
and for crossdressers... i dont mind as long they are respecting.. you cant hide from your children just like you hide them from world.. we cant.. even alot kids are crossdressers in school... we cant prevent.. AS LONG.. they are respecting.. go in proper gender restrooms..

for deaf club not allow crossdressers, thats discriminations.. WHAT if.. a guy who is homeless, someone gave him clothes, that fit him.. he wears almost like lady clothes, as long he is clothing.. still not allow in deaf club or public places that forbid crossdressers.. thats sad..
Click to expand...

Yep. They are not bad people and not all of them go out of their way to dress inappropriate. A good example would be my friend Debra Davis in MN...she was a man, and she had her sex reassignment surgery, and now dresses like a woman. She doesn't wear "hooker" clothes...she is in her 50s I think and actually dresses her own age...she was a librarian and dresses like one. What is wrong with that? Why shouldn't children see that? Come on!

As for restroom issues, some places (not many, it's still a new thing) not only provide men's restroom and women's restroom, they also provide unisex restrooms as well. This one, any gender can go in if they feel comfortable going in there. If they do not feel comfortable, they can still go into the restroom of their own gender. This makes it comfortable for everyone.

And yes, I believe that not allowing a guy into the club because he crossdresses/or is a transgender is discrimination. I would understand if he dressed like one of those hookers that one would see on Hennepin Ave in MPLS, but if he dressed like Debra Davis or just regular women's clothing, then well, come on!
 
It seems that it's only called "crossdressing" if a man dresses in women's cloths.

I wonder why it is more acceptable in the US for women to dress like men that it is for men to dress like women.
 
good point gnulinxman,
I wear guys shorts, but nobody accuses me of crossdressing.
 
No, it is okay for women to wear pants.
But men who put on makeup, panty hose, high heel, wigs, dresses and all...
And women shave their hair off, wearing ties, men's suit, and men shoes.

That what I am talking about.
 
Do Crossdressers have split personality disorder or no?
Click to expand...

Good question. If they do have it, it's because they cannot be free to express themselves so they pretend to be macho in public. I guess?
 
I wear GUY'S shorts......shorts expressively for GUYS!!!!!!!!
What's so fucking wrong about me wearing guys clothes or netrox wearing dresses/skirts etc?
 
Just a thought--If we are going to adhere to the Biblical standards of dress, why aren't we all wearing four-cornered garments with fringes every day?
 
FreedummyRing said:
we have to wear it everyday?

I got a sweater with fringes.
Click to expand...

I don't know. I'm just citing Numbers 15:38 and Deuteronomy 22:12.

The point is that you're complaining about people wearing the clothes of the opposite gender when the rules were given (or devised, whichever) at a time where clothing was wildly different than it is today.

Arguably, the requirement of fringes is no longer relevant since garments do not have four corners anymore. Logically, if that rule is no longer relevant, rules regarding single-gender clothing, which also address the same four-cornered garments, are not relevant either.
 
Teresh said:
Just a thought--If we are going to adhere to the Biblical standards of dress, why aren't we all wearing four-cornered garments with fringes every day?
Click to expand...
Because we aren't all Jews.

Numbers 15:38
Speak unto the children of Israel, and bid them that they make them fringes in the borders of their garments throughout their generations, and that they put upon the fringe of the borders a ribband of blue:
 
Reba said:
Because we aren't all Jews.

Numbers 15:38
Speak unto the children of Israel, and bid them that they make them fringes in the borders of their garments throughout their generations, and that they put upon the fringe of the borders a ribband of blue:
Click to expand...

By that logic the crossdressing rule should be null and void too.
 
Because we aren't all Jews.
Click to expand...

With that logic, the Leviticus code putting homosexuals to death should be void as well since it's directed to Isrealites (or Hebrews) as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top