rockin'robin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Messages
- 24,430
- Reaction score
- 551
So what's the point? Are you shaming people who are that obese?
A woman once describe how people treated her. She didn't go out to restaurants any more because people glared at her while she ate. People are so mean to her. Can you imagine how humiliating it is not to fit in a seat? Especially for women who are pressured in our society to achieve an impossible beauty standard. I'll never look like a model, unless I can find a way to add at least 6 inches to my height. lol
I really do see ur point, Sally. But it's the "child", at age 14, 555 lbs.! And if the court did not intervene, this child would more than likely get heavier and heavier....The mother's lack of cooperation to help the child is a factor here too. I'm in agreement with the courts becuz it might save the child's life. And the mother, hopefully will get some help herself. And I feel confident sooner or later, the child might be returned to the mother, as long as she is in cooperation with her son's health.
It might be a medical problem or an eating problem, the reason for this obseity is being looked into. Even one of my boys was about 30 lbs. overweight at one time. He was called "fat boy"....I knew I had to stop his snacking (late at night) somehow....I enrolled him in baseball and now he's into football, and goes to the gym several times a week (all my boys do).
A "fat" child is not a happy child, I feel something else is wrong here.
All of us are responsible for our bodies and health. Whether it be eating, smoking, drugs, etc. When an eating "habit" is started at a very young age, and continues without intervention, it will continue into adulthood.
IMO the entire system needs to be revamped. WIC, with it's restrictions on specific, healthy foods, operates much more efficiently. The food stamp program needs to follow some of their guidelines, and to allow for limited purchase of necessity items.