Coakley lags behind Scott Brown for the Mass. Senate seat?

Status
Not open for further replies.
kokonut said:
The White House uses it. Coakley team uses it. So does the media and independent sources. Obviously there is value in doing polls which is why they must be done on a regular basis to see what has changed.
Click to expand...

they use it. I don't :)
 
Jiro said:
let me say it in different word - The poll expected Coleman to win but nope!
Click to expand...

No. As the days went by and closer to the voting date polling results narrowed and was well within the margin of error (which is normally +/-3%) and could go either way. As for the Coakley and Brown situation, the polling results didn't behave like that. Instead over the last two weeks showed Brown inching ahead and then the last several days had him pulling ahead. It was only like a month ago that Brown was down by -15 behind Coakley but now he's at a +9 points ahead of her and that's outside the margin of error.
 
:zzz: wake me up when the winner has been anounced
 
kokonut said:
The White House uses it. Coakley team uses it. So does the media and independent sources. Obviously there is value in doing polls which is why they must be done on a regular basis to see what has changed.
Click to expand...

But for me so no and I would be loled if you use it.
 
kokonut said:
No. As the days went by and closer to the voting date polling results narrowed and was well within the margin of error (which is normally +/-3%) and could go either way. As for the Coakley and Brown situation, the polling results didn't behave like that. Instead over the last two weeks showed Brown inching ahead and then the last several days had him pulling ahead. It was only like a month ago that Brown was down by -15 behind Coakley but now he's at a +9 points ahead of her and that's outside the margin of error.
Click to expand...

then you must be worry and be fear at night but I don't.

I'm relaxed and interesting about election tomorrow.

It's obviously that you don't want health care reform to be kicks in, even no public options are included.
 
Massachussetts does not need health care reform. Their own state provides health care coverage for the people of Mass. That's the big irony right now. They don't want nationalized health care. It's quite an unpopular question when people are asked about it because Mass already covers it.
 
kokonut said:
Massachussetts does not need health care reform. Their own state provides health care coverage for the people of Mass. That's the big irony right now. They don't want nationalized health care. It's quite an unpopular question when people are asked about it because Mass already covers it.
Click to expand...

It means you don't care if private insurance denies me to have insurance due IBS so existing law said insurance has rights to deny me or pay a expensive monthly for insurance if I want get it outside of work.

Also insurance has pre-existing condition so it would deny me from receive treatment or meds for IBS when I switch to other insurance, that's shameful and that how my life is suffer so hard.

That's reason because I support health care reform, even no public options but it all about new regulation on private insurance.
 
Foxrac said:
It means you don't care if private insurance denies me to have insurance due IBS so existing law said insurance has rights to deny me or pay a expensive monthly for insurance if I want get it outside of work.

Also insurance has pre-existing condition so it would deny me from receive treatment or meds for IBS when I switch to other insurance, that's shameful and that how my life is suffer so hard.

That's reason because I support health care reform, even no public options but it all about new regulation on private insurance.
Click to expand...

Health care reform was hastily put together without the proper input, lack of transparency for the public, by passed any 72 hours review period (which is impossible since this is a 2,000+ page bill) and that senators were bribed to get their "dibs" on the health care reform, not to mention the ungodly number of porks inserted into the reform bill.
Pork greased reform's passage - - POLITICO.com

This needs to start over. There is no hurry because if the health care reform gets passed it won't take place until 2013.
 
kokonut said:
Health care reform was hastily put together without the proper input, lack of transparency for the public, by passed any 72 hours review period (which is impossible since this is a 2,000+ page bill) and that senators were bribed to get their "dibs" on the health care reform, not to mention the ungodly number of porks inserted into the reform bill.
Pork greased reform's passage - - POLITICO.com

This needs to start over. There is no hurry because if the health care reform gets passed it won't take place until 2013.
Click to expand...

hastily put together? Didn't we try to work on this decades ago?
 
Jiro said:
hastily put together? Didn't we try to work on this decades ago?
Click to expand...

Not to the point of actually having a complete Health Care Reform bill ready and voted on in both chambers.
 
kokonut said:
Not to the point of actually having a complete Health Care Reform bill ready and voted on in both chambers.
Click to expand...

did we ever have complete bill on any other issues anyway? :dunno:
 
This is about the "Health Care Reform" bill. What other "issues" are you talking about?
 
kokonut said:
This is about the "Health Care Reform" bill. What other "issues" are you talking about?
Click to expand...

since you're being adamant about sticking with Health Care Reform bill topic.... I'm afraid I cannot answer your question. :aw:
 
kokonut said:
Health care reform was hastily put together without the proper input, lack of transparency for the public, by passed any 72 hours review period (which is impossible since this is a 2,000+ page bill) and that senators were bribed to get their "dibs" on the health care reform, not to mention the ungodly number of porks inserted into the reform bill.
Pork greased reform's passage - - POLITICO.com

This needs to start over. There is no hurry because if the health care reform gets passed it won't take place until 2013.
Click to expand...

Why republican don't introduce the health care reform during Bush Admin?
 
Brown won the seat... now you can be happy that you will NOT have health care insurance if you ever need it for free or low cost.
 
netrox said:
Brown won the seat... now you can be happy that you will NOT have health care insurance if you ever need it for free or low cost.
Click to expand...

But... it isn't over to kill the health care reform, the house would have vote the senate's health care bill before could goes to Obama's desk so only 2 weeks to left because he wouldn't get certify to seat in 2 weeks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top