CBS purposely leaves out candidates during debates

Status
Not open for further replies.
There you go. It is about Bachman and CBS regarding the debates. Better stop that victory lap before you fall over.
 
kokonut said:
This is about CBS attempt to pick and choose which questions go to the candidates. Bachman got the short end of the stick with hardly any questions. Read my title: "CBS purposely leaves out candidates during debates." Note the plural for "candidates"? If anyone had watched the debate you could tell Santorum didn't get much questions tossed his way, either. I provided the money shot where CBS got caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

" 'Okay let’s keep it loose though since she’s not going to get many questions and she’s nearly off the charts in the hopes that we can get someone else,' Dickerson replied, apparently unaware that Stewart was copied on the email."
Click to expand...

YOURS----"This is about CBS..."
MINE---"Since this is about CBS....."

almost finish with my victory lap :)
 
I can't blame CBS becsuse Bachmann is obviously piece of shit and I have zero respect for her.
 
Bachman is nobody. Ron Paul is one of the three top contenders but you don't hear the Repubs talking about him. :giggle:
Go, Ron Paul, go!
 
This is a long running war between FOX and CBS. The problem isn't the coverage so much as the fact that political parties shouldn't be able to market their news broadcast as anything other than political advertisements. They should all have a disclaimer as regular advertisements do.
 
Since when has TV not been the boss? Take a look at college sports; they basically force teams to have games played in the craziest time periods, just becuase they can.
CBS is using the same style of programming here that they would for anything they broadcast. It is not about fairness; it is about profit. Since when did the Right consider that a problem? Why didn't Fox step up and offer them an entire evening block of time? "Americon Idol will be preempted for An Evening of American Conservatives Speak."
 
Thank you, Saywhatkid, for your post.
It really is "all about profit. There is freedom of the press but MM used to report the news "pure" and let the viewers/readers use their judgement. Today it news is "framed" to the liking of the advertisers and the public gets "slanted reports"
 
rolling7 said:
Thank you, Saywhatkid, for your post.
It really is "all about profit. There is freedom of the press but MM used to report the news "pure" and let the viewers/readers use their judgement. Today it news is "framed" to the liking of the advertisers and the public gets "slanted reports"
Click to expand...

All of them are guilty of "bottom line" programming.
 
Those poor abused conservatives just can't get a break anywhere.:roll:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top