Brain in Woman's Womb

Status
Not open for further replies.
Football coaches and actors create jobs?

Absolutely! They are both part of big money-making enterprises.

The top actors, that is. Not so much the local guy down the street who does community theater.
 
Absolutely! They are both part of big money-making enterprises.

The top actors, that is. Not so much the local guy down the street who does community theater.

Exactly what jobs do actors and football coaches create?
 
Are you serious? Do you ever watch football on Sunday afternoons? They are *part* of the entire sports industry. Lots and lots of money (TV rights, Bowl game money, players' salaries, etc., etc. ride directly or indirectly on coaches' performance.

You ever go to the movies? Watch TV? Pay to see a movie because an actor you like is in it, vs. skip watching something because you don't care for the star?
 
Are you serious? Do you ever watch football on Sunday afternoons? They are *part* of the entire sports industry. Lots and lots of money (TV rights, Bowl game money, players' salaries, etc., etc. ride directly or indirectly on coaches' performance.

You ever go to the movies? Watch TV? Pay to see a movie because an actor you like is in it, vs. skip watching something because you don't care for the star?

That is not the football coach or the actor creating jobs. That is the financial aspects of an industry, not the individual creating a job. The sports industry creates it, not the football coach on his own. The entertainment industry creates it, not the actor on his own. You seem to be confused about systems and individuals.

And you still didn't answer my question. You simply posed another question. That is indicative of not having an answer.
 
Are you serious? Do you ever watch football on Sunday afternoons? They are *part* of the entire sports industry. Lots and lots of money (TV rights, Bowl game money, players' salaries, etc., etc. ride directly or indirectly on coaches' performance.

You ever go to the movies? Watch TV? Pay to see a movie because an actor you like is in it, vs. skip watching something because you don't care for the star?


That's the industry. How many people work directly for those people? How many work in the industry?

Big difference.
 
That's the industry. How many people work directly for those people? How many work in the industry?

Big difference.

That's why I emphasized they are *part* of the entire sports industry.

Point is - if you want to make big money, serious money, you need to become very, very skilled at something, such that your services are seen as essential; you can start your own business; you can come up with original ideas which are marketable and add value to something; you can be a top manager; so on and so forth.

Relatively few people in the U.S. become rich because they inherited money. Nearly all of the top 1% are in that group because of their own skills, abilities, and achievements.
 
Someone ought to screw the woman's brain out. :giggle:
 
rolling7, curious question. What do you think is the percentage of people (of those who have 10 million dollars or more) earned that money in their lifetime due to business growth?

Good question that I can't answer for certain. However, all those guys I listed in OP did.
 
Why are they always advertising for more workers? Mindless question.

Perhaps you could consider that Wal-Mart, McDonalds, etc. open a few new stores EVERY month.

hint: new stores = new positions/jobs = more workers hired

Walmart is for people who want dead end jobs. Same with McDonald's, you don't go anywhere with that one.

I don't consider jobs at Walmart to be a part of a job growth because they do not provide stability to the economy. In fact, Walmart is directly responsible for inflicting harm upon many small businesses especially in small towns. This is why you don't see Walmart in a lot of big cities like New York City.
 
A few NFL coaches were fired this season. The teams did not have more jobs created by replacing the coach. They just replace one person.
 
Are you serious? Do you ever watch football on Sunday afternoons? They are *part* of the entire sports industry. Lots and lots of money (TV rights, Bowl game money, players' salaries, etc., etc. ride directly or indirectly on coaches' performance.

You ever go to the movies? Watch TV? Pay to see a movie because an actor you like is in it, vs. skip watching something because you don't care for the star?

You are thinking of "Mr. NBC, Mr.CBS, Mr. ABC, etc"
It is not the coaches nor actors PAYING salaries.
 
Walmart is for people who want dead end jobs. Same with McDonald's, you don't go anywhere with that one.

I don't consider jobs at Walmart to be a part of a job growth because they do not provide stability to the economy. In fact, Walmart is directly responsible for inflicting harm upon many small businesses especially in small towns. This is why you don't see Walmart in a lot of big cities like New York City.

In part I agee with you. I do think the reason Wal-Mart is not in some cities (i.e. N.Y.C.) is sure to zoning laws.
 
In part I agee with you. I do think the reason Wal-Mart is not in some cities (i.e. N.Y.C.) is sure to zoning laws.

Also, because Wal-Mart tends to be a sprawling establishment. It would be prohibitively expensive for them to buy up several blocks of real estate in NYC.
 
That's why I emphasized they are *part* of the entire sports industry.

Point is - if you want to make big money, serious money, you need to become very, very skilled at something, such that your services are seen as essential; you can start your own business; you can come up with original ideas which are marketable and add value to something; you can be a top manager; so on and so forth.

Relatively few people in the U.S. become rich because they inherited money. Nearly all of the top 1% are in that group because of their own skills, abilities, and achievements.

That still does not have anything to do with football coaches and actors creating jobs.:roll:
 
Also, because Wal-Mart tends to be a sprawling establishment. It would be prohibitively expensive for them to buy up several blocks of real estate in NYC.

Hmm, I hadn't thought about that one but yes that would make sense.
 
Also, because Wal-Mart tends to be a sprawling establishment. It would be prohibitively expensive for them to buy up several blocks of real estate in NYC.

True that. And Walmart is all about the profit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top