And we worry about international terrorists

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jiro said:
the answer is I don't know and I doubt it.

would it be possible if you can tone down your insulting behavior? it's tiresome and one step away from report button. you're insulting people left and right.
Click to expand...

The bolded would be the answer. Thank you.:ty:

You stop the insults, I'll stop replying in an insulting manner.
 
Jiro said:
it's a question that shouldn't even be asked in the first place anyway. it's not even a good question.


huh? where? :confused:
Click to expand...

All questions are good questions.
 
and I asked you several more questions - Did they need CCW to rent a truck? To drive a truck to federal building? To obtain bomb materials? To kill people? And are you linking people with CCW with tendency to commit domestic terrorism?

All questions are good questions, right? So can I get a simple answer to my question in a same manner I answered your question?
 
Jiro said:
and I asked you several more questions - Did they need CCW to rent a truck? To drive a truck to federal building? To obtain bomb materials? To kill people? And are you linking people with CCW with tendency to commit domestic terrorism?

All questions are good questions, right? So can I get a simple answer to my question in a same manner I answered your question?
Click to expand...

Okay, you want an answer. I don't know what they needed to rent a truck. I wasn't there.

To drive a truck, no. To drive a truck, armed? Yes, if they were doing it legally.

To obtain bomb materials? No. But I doubt that they had a CCW for bombs, anyway.

To kill people? They didn't kill anyone. They were planning to kill people.
 
jillio said:
Okay, you want an answer. I don't know what they needed to rent a truck. I wasn't there.
Click to expand...
You know very well that all you need is a valid driver license and credit card in order to rent a vehicle. They rented it from Ryder.

jillio said:
To drive a truck, no. To drive a truck, armed? Yes, if they were doing it legally.
Click to expand...
There's no need for "if". We can stick with facts at hand. Approximately 90 minutes after bombing, Tim McVeigh was pulled over by Oklahoma State Trooper. He was charged with driving without license plate and unlawfully carrying a weapon so we can safely deduce that Tim McVeigh did not have a CCW license.

jillio said:
To obtain bomb materials? No. But I doubt that they had a CCW for bombs, anyway.
Click to expand...
Right.

jillio said:
To kill people? They didn't kill anyone. They were planning to kill people.
Click to expand...
yes they did kill people with their truck bomb. 168 lives lost..... and that 19 children included.


you missed one more question - where did I insult you?
 
Jiro said:
You know very well that all you need is a valid driver license and credit card in order to rent a vehicle. They rented it from Ryder.


There's no need for "if". We can stick with facts at hand. Approximately 90 minutes after bombing, Tim McVeigh was pulled over by Oklahoma State Trooper. He was charged with driving without license plate and unlawfully carrying a weapon so we can safely deduce that Tim McVeigh did not have a CCW license.


Right.


yes they did kill people with their truck bomb. 168 lives lost..... and that 19 children included.


you missed one more question - where did I insult you?
Click to expand...

Where did Tim McVeigh come in? I was referring to the guys in the article. Were you talking about Tim McVeigh? That is a whole different story.
 
jillio said:
Where did Tim McVeigh come in? I was referring to the guys in the article. Were you talking about Tim McVeigh? That is a whole different story.
Click to expand...

weren't we talking about Oklahoma Bombing? That's the reason why we're both talking about truck bomb.

In case you didn't know, there's no mention of truck bomb or truck in OP. They were going to drive a car to disperse a biological agent.

did you miss the last question in my previous post? are you avoiding it?
 
jillio said:
Where did Tim McVeigh come in? I was referring to the guys in the article. Were you talking about Tim McVeigh? That is a whole different story.
Click to expand...

According to the article, the men were planning on buying exploves and poisons. Guess McVeigh is a strawman to distract from the debate.
 
Jiro said:
weren't we talking about Oklahoma Bombing? That's the reason why we're both talking about truck bomb.

In case you didn't know, there's no mention of truck bomb or truck in OP. They were going to drive a car to disperse a biological agent.

did you miss the last question in my previous post? are you avoiding it?
Click to expand...

No. We were talking about the guys in the OP. At least I was. I'm not sure who you were talking about.

That is why your questions made virtually no sense to me. They were completely unrelated to who I was referring to when you responded to my post with truck bombs and people they killed, and whatever else you brought into it.
 
deafskeptic said:
According to the article, the men were planning on buying exploves and poisons. Guess McVeigh is a strawman to distract from the debate.
Click to expand...

distract? what?

we can go back to those Georgia terrorists then. So CCW? That's not a strawman to distract from what they were going to do?
 
jillio said:
No. We were talking about the guys in the OP. At least I was. I'm not sure who you were talking about.

That is why your questions made virtually no sense to me. They were completely unrelated to who I was referring to when you responded to my post with truck bombs and people they killed, and whatever else you brought into it.
Click to expand...

ok my bad then. let's get back to Georgia terrorists then.

so where did I insult you as you claimed that I did?
 
Jiro said:
distract? what?

we can go back to those Georgia terrorists then. So CCW? That's not a strawman to distract from what they were going to do?
Click to expand...

No. It is a question regarding the Georgia suspects arrested in regard to their background. Perfectly legitimate question.
 
A criminal would not need a CCW.. cause they are criminals right?? They will arm themselve with illegal guns and bombs etc.. Which is why they are called criminals in the first place.

Law abiding citizens goes out and get a CCW.. Crooks just go and steal guns or buy them from other crooks.

I see Jiro's point.
 
Babyblue said:
A criminal would not need a CCW.. cause they are criminals right?? They will arm themselve with illegal guns and bombs etc.. Which is why they are called criminals in the first place.

Law abiding citizens goes out and get a CCW.. Crooks just go and steal guns or buy them from other crooks.

I see Jiro's point.
Click to expand...

I saw his point. He fails to see mine. I am interested in these suspects history. They didn't become militia overnight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top