Abortion, immigration changes among new 2012 laws

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,425
Reaction score
551
Girls seeking abortions in New Hampshire must first tell their parents or a judge, some employers in Alabama must verify new workers' U.S. residency, and California students will be the first in the country to receive mandatory lessons about the contributions of gays and lesbians under state laws set to take effect at the start of 2012.

Many laws reflect the nation's concerns over immigration, the cost of government and the best way to protect and benefit young people, including regulations on sports concussions.

Alabama, with the country's toughest immigration law, is enacting a key provision requiring all employers who do business with any government entity to use a federal system known as E-Verify to check that all new employees are in the country legally.

Georgia is putting a similar law into effect requiring any business with 500 or more employees to use E-Verify to check the employment eligibility of new hires. The requirement is being phased in, with all employers with more than 10 employees to be included by July 2013.

Supporters said they wanted to deter illegal immigrants from coming to Georgia by making it tougher for them to work. Critics said that changes to immigration law should come at the federal level and that portions of the law already in effect are already hurting Georgia.

"It is destroying Georgia's economy and it is destroying the fabric of our social network in South Georgia," Paul Bridges, mayor of the onion-farming town of Uvalda, said in November. He is part of a lawsuit challenging the new law.

Tennessee will also require businesses to ensure employees are legally authorized to work in the U.S. but exempts employers with five or fewer workers and allows them to keep a copy of the new hire's driver's license instead of using E-Verify.

A South Carolina law would allow officials to yank the operating licenses of businesses that don't check new hires' legal status through E-verify. A federal judge last week blocked parts of the law that would have required police to check the immigration status of criminal suspects or people stopped for traffic violations they think might be in the country illegally, and that would have made it a crime for illegal immigrants to transport or house themselves.

California is also addressing illegal immigration, but with a bill that allows students who entered the country illegally to receive private financial aid at public colleges.

Many laws aim to protect young people. In Colorado, coaches will be required to bench players as young as 11 when they're believed to have suffered a head injury. The young athletes will also need medical clearance to return to play.

The law also requires coaches in public
and private schools and even volunteer Little League and Pop Warner football coaches to take free annual online training to recognize the symptoms of a concussion. At least a dozen other states have enacted similar laws with the support of the National Football League.

People 18 and under in Illinois will have to wear seat belts while riding in taxis for school-related purposes, and Illinois school boards can now suspend or expel students who make explicit threats on websites against other students or school employees.

Florida will take control of lunch and other school food programs from the federal government, allowing the state to put more Florida-grown fresh fruit and vegetables on school menus. Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam says the change will help children eat healthier.

A California law will add gays and lesbians and people with disabilities to the list of social and ethnic groups whose contributions must be taught in history lessons in public schools. The law also bans teaching materials that reflect poorly on gays or particular religions.

Opponents have filed five potential initiatives to repeal the requirement
or let parents remove their children while gays' contributions are being taught.

In New Hampshire, a law requiring girls seeking abortions to tell their parents or a judge first was reinstated by conservative Republicans over a gubernatorial veto. The state enacted a similar law eight years ago, but it was never enforced following a series of lawsuits.

In Arkansas, facilities that perform 10 or more nonsurgical abortions a month must be licensed by the state Health Department and be subject to inspections by the department, the same requirements faced by facilities that offer surgical abortions in the state.

It affects two Planned Parenthood facilities that offer the abortion pill, though they're not singled out in the statute.

Among federal laws, a measure Congress passed last week to extend Social Security tax cuts and federal unemployment benefit programs raises insurance fees on new mortgages and refinancings backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration by 0.1 percent beginning Jan. 1.

That covers about 90 percent of them and effectively makes a borrower's monthly payment on a new $200,000 mortgage or refinancing about $17 a month more than it would have been if obtained before the first of the year.

Nevada's 3-month old ban on texting while driving will get tougher, with tickets replacing the warnings
that police have issued since the ban took effect Oct. 1. In Pennsylvania, police are preparing to enforce that state's recently enacted ban on texting, scheduled to take effect by spring.

Election law changes in Rhode Island and Tennessee will require voters to present photo ID, a measure that supporters say prevents fraud and that opponents say will make it harder for minorities and the elderly to cast ballots.

In Ohio, a measure that creates one primary in March, instead of two that would have cost the state an extra $15 million, goes into effect later in January.

Ohio is also one of eight states with automatic increases in the minimum wage taking effect Jan. 1. The others, with increases between 28 and 37 cents, are Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Montana, Oregon, Vermont and Washington.

A few laws try to address budget woes. In Delaware, new state employees will have to contribute more to their pensions, while state workers hired after Jan. 1 in Nevada will have to pony up for their own health care costs in retirement.

Jan. 1 is the effective date in many states for laws passed during this year's legislative sessions. In others, laws take effect July 1, or 90 days after passage.

Abortion, immigration changes among new 2012 laws - Yahoo! News
 
Last edited:
Can some one please tell me what being gay or lesbian has to to with big accomplishments in life? Does it really matter about someone's sexual preference in regards to accomplishing something big?

I agree that minor children should have to have parental consent for an abortion. That is why they are called minors because their parents are supposed to be responsible for them. As far as voting without and ID, forget it! No ID, no vote! Why do we have to have new laws on stuff like this. It only makes sense. I wonder why we are asked to pay for the college education of illegal immigrant children? If I went abroad I seriously doubt a foreign country would pay for my education! Legal immigration is how it is supposed to work.
 
Last edited:
Can some one please tell me what being gay or lesbian has to to with big accomplishments in life? Does it really matter about someone's sexual preference in regards to accomplishing something big?

I agree that minor children should have to have parental consent for an abortion. That is why they are called minors because their parents are supposed to be responsible for them. As far as voting without and ID, forget it! No ID, no vote! Why do we have to have new laws on stuff like this. It only makes sense. I wonder why we are asked to pay for the college education of illegal immigrant children? If I went abroad I seriously doubt a foreign country would pay for my education! Legal immigration is how it is supposed to work.

Actually, it has more to do with oppression than sexual preference. And, I think you need to read up on foreign education because some countries might be insulted by that statement.

We pay for illegal immigrant children in schools because they were born in the United States which makes them American.

This is a very conservative view, but no country can be completely conservative nor liberal.

Problems are not as simple as they seem...
 
I really don't have a problem with any of these laws, but I think it's stupid that we have to legislate common sense in the first place. Oh well.
 
Can some one please tell me what being gay or lesbian has to to with big accomplishments in life? Does it really matter about someone's sexual preference in regards to accomplishing something big?

I agree that minor children should have to have parental consent for an abortion. That is why they are called minors because their parents are supposed to be responsible for them. As far as voting without and ID, forget it! No ID, no vote! Why do we have to have new laws on stuff like this. It only makes sense. I wonder why we are asked to pay for the college education of illegal immigrant children? If I went abroad I seriously doubt a foreign country would pay for my education! Legal immigration is how it is supposed to work.

Nobody is being asked to pay for the education of an illegal immigrant. The bill just allows illegal immigrants access to private financial aide. More revenue for America. What's the problem?

Also, consider that if we educate illegal immigrants, we are effectively "Americanizing" them. We are teaching them our values, our history, our language. I have no problem with educating illegal immigrants or their children.
 
Nobody is being asked to pay for the education of an illegal immigrant. The bill just allows illegal immigrants access to private financial aide. More revenue for America. What's the problem?

Also, consider that if we educate illegal immigrants, we are effectively "Americanizing" them. We are teaching them our values, our history, our language. I have no problem with educating illegal immigrants or their children.

Ditto. Why should they deny American citizens the opportunity to pursue a higher education?
 
Actually, it has more to do with oppression than sexual preference. And, I think you need to read up on foreign education because some countries might be insulted by that statement.

We pay for illegal immigrant children in schools because they were born in the United States which makes them American.

This is a very conservative view, but no country can be completely conservative nor liberal.

Problems are not as simple as they seem...

California is also addressing illegal immigration, but with a bill that allows students who entered the country illegally to receive private financial aid at public colleges.


Please tell me what countries that you know of that I as an American citizen can go and attend college for free?
 
Ditto. Why should they deny American citizens the opportunity to pursue a higher education?

Because they are not American citizens! I am talking about the California bill. Re-read the article.
 
California is also addressing illegal immigration, but with a bill that allows students who entered the country illegally to receive private financial aid at public colleges.


Please tell me what countries that you know of that I as an American citizen can go and attend college for free?

Is private financial aid publicly funded?

In this country or abroad? In this country, if you write letters for private aid (an abundance of which is available and never gets claimed) you have a good chance of receiving it. I have a friend who paid for his entire, "private" education by private aid which he sought out during his school years. In fact, Harvard is one of the cheapest schools in terms of student costs because private funds are abundant to obscene proportions. And, there is no limitation on using those funds for public schools as well(plenty of public school alumi as well). Abroad, free universities are much more prevalent in Europe and other countries not only to nationals but to non-nationals as well.

Free education - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think what you are asking is whether the school will accept you at all, correct? Particularly, whether the school will accept an illegal immigrant.
Or is it a question of other people funding illegal students?

I don't dispute there is a problem with illegal immigration at the tax level, but attacking the problem at the education level is probably not the smartest way to handle it, IMO. Dumb people do dumb things and then we have more problems not less.

The fact is, American students are not very motivated. The problem is not that students can't get into college. The problem is that they don't want to get into college.

EDIT: To be fair, college isn't easy it's hard, but it is nothing compared to being in an unemployment line waiting for your last check and people who have had a hard life understand this.

Bush had the right idea to make them all legal and then close the loop hole, shutting people off while they are here is only going to cause problems not solve them.
 
Does private aid mean grants or loans? If loans, what's the big deal? If grants, it has to be because the illegal students were doing very well in school, in which case, they can only be an asset, not a detriment.
 
California is also addressing illegal immigration, but with a bill that allows students who entered the country illegally to receive private financial aid at public colleges.


Please tell me what countries that you know of that I as an American citizen can go and attend college for free?

Do you not read very well?

This bill will allow illegal immigrants private financial aid. Financial aid is lent and repaid with interest. Increasing the pool of borrowers will only generate more wealth for American lenders as we indoctrinate and Americanize more of the world's population. Tell me how that is bad for anyone.
 
Do you not read very well?

This bill will allow illegal immigrants private financial aid. Financial aid is lent and repaid with interest. Increasing the pool of borrowers will only generate more wealth for American lenders as we indoctrinate and Americanize more of the world's population. Tell me how that is bad for anyone.

Tell me why we as Americans should be funding the education of illegal immigrants in any way public or private. They are here illegally! If they are here illegally then they are breaking our laws. They deserve no benefits. If we gave no benefits to illegals then that would drastically reduce their numbers in coming here and taking American jobs. I can almost guarantee you that if they are attending our colleges or universities they are also getting some form of government assistance too. I do realize that there are some jobs that Americans are not willing to take (which is another problem in and of itself) but rewarding them with benefits just keeps them coming in steadily. I am not against legal immigration at all. I met a young man from Somalia the other day who became an American citizen and works hard driving a truck for a local company here. He has to work hard 7 days a week for 11 months and then he can take a month off after Christmas during the slow times anyway. I was proud to call him a citizen. He was polite, respectful and had a good command of the English language and our culture and heritage. Nothing wrong with that at all! Can you tell me what foreign country would welcome us as American citizens and give us financial aid and education benefits while we are staying there illegally and breaking their laws? Anyone?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top