Cousin Vinny
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2005
- Messages
- 725
- Reaction score
- 1
What many people do not know is that the mainstream press conveniently forget to mention that embryonic stem cells cannot be used safely in human beings at present because of worries over tissue rejection and their demonstrated propensity in animal studies to cause deadly tumors--problems not associated with adult stem cell therapies.
I never had any idea about this distinction between adult and embryonic stem cells! Thank you for an illuminating post.Still, such adult stem cell treatment for hearing loss is still years away and may or may not achieve a high degree of success in eliminating hearing loss. Admittedly, adult stem cell therapies hold much promise in ameloriating Deafness and such scientific study and development should be encouraged.
I don't know either. Maybe it's the 'ethical' issues surrounding the embryonic stem cell tissue collection is what makes it 'newsworthy'? Perhaps, adult stem cell tissue may be difficult and/or costly to harvest, while embryonic stem cell tissue can be readily available, thanks to hundreds of fertility clinics and surplus genetic material currently on ice.I've been aware of how many of the press manipulates stem cell coverage by touting embryonic stem cells to no end versus adult or tissue stem cells successes.
Ask yourself this question. Why is the mainstream media doing this?

