Search results

What about if we exchange the information? Building up each other's knowledge.

^ I also met an American friend they said it was different. Oh, please tell any interesting points you find in American deaf culture and English deaf culture if you do find any.

Some schools improved, at least it did for my old school.

What are the differences between them? Are the deaf culture the same? Which deaf people from those countries are better equipped for hearing world? Which country provides more support for its deaf people? Is education for deaf people in both countries good? And many more questions...

Primary: BSL (Actually, mixed SSE and BSL but I can do full BSL). Secondary: English in written form.

RSD = Royal School for the deaf, Derby. Ofsted report doesn't paint the whole picture. I have a pretty large network of friends living many different areas that have went to some of schools you listed.

I forgot the magic word, "Transliteration". Yes. BSL's grammar, syntax and structure are also very different from English. That's why I asked this question. I know ASL are also very different from English too.

No, as in there is no dark. Dark exists solely because of absence of light. Basically, at same speed of light.

Sunny signs cleared that up. That's what I was looking for.

No, I meant if you were to literally translate ASL and BSL into English, would the result be same?

53%... Meh.

Care to elaborate?

Most of schools you listed aren't even good. Some schools you listed have a serious problem as such as RSD have a serious issues regarding to students. Well-known school does not equal to good school. I know Frank Barnes school ages ago, and it was bad in past but I don't know if it has improved...

Well, I can communicate in writing, but that's too long. Also, are the universities required to provide you note-takers?

If you were to translate ASL and BSL word by word to English literally, would this "English" language be the exact the same in ASL and BSL in terms of grammar and sentence structure?

Well, I think differently. When a star explodes, a lot of energy is emitted, but at same time, a lot of element/compounds are also emitted too. After explosion of star, there is might be a black hole that would suck all things in. So, I think it is not only energy that would destroy solar system.

Gamma rays are electromagnetic radiation, so travel in same speed as visible light does. Gamma rays can not destroy other galaxies/solar system. If this is was true, then we all wouldn't exist! The sun produces awful a lot of gamma rays and Earth's atmosphere blocks most of gamma rays and...

Looks like you're oblivious the fact that sarcasm doesn't work very well across the internet. :roll: @Jiro and Secretblend: Not "wrong" as "definitely wrong", but as "possibly wrong". By my definition, re-thinking and re-tweaking of theory means it was wrong in first place. Hence why...

It was from Metro newspaper I read on last Monday.

In the UK? Yes. Checking Mary Hare website, the results aren't impressive considering they are private school. I know one deaf free state school that does well compared to Mary Hare.