Search results

And when that study is backed to others more recently? Tells me there is a verifiable trend... looking at only one study or study from one area risks bianess... you have to look at more then one or two... if you look for a trend you have to look at many through different times... look past just...

Curious... what did you use for these? I really like how the sky looks in two of them...

Again... move back from CI... I am not saying it is CI philosophy... it is the philosophy behind it... in case you missed it, for all the times it has been stated, that philosophy is oralism. Since you have admitted to not reading much let me clarify, that philosophy date back to ancient times...

Stick around long enough and it becomes less odd... I have had deaf I do not know come up and know who I was... it is a small community and signs travel fast lol

Awesome... looks like a lot of fun. :)

True... but it you look at the top group of nations they also seem to be ones that have the ability to dedicate so much time to a variety of sports... sorry just an odd question than pinged of my mind...

LOL.... too late for me to claim that :) but thank you for the vote of confidence :D

Seeings as Hoichi and I have both supported bilingualism, it comes as no surprise that he would post and then defend this article... so keep reaching for straws on how you can vilify him... Seeings as you also attack me and I do not do the above, excuse me if I do not believe you... more than...

Arctually no it was not pro oral or pro sign... it was pro bilingualism... The very fact that the article Hoichi posted is pro bilingualism may point to a few facts... the fact your are attempting to belittle and attack an article that is attempting to encourage bilingualism is also telling...

..

So sure I have not? It is not the tech that is the issue, it is the philosophy that goes with it and those that follow it so strongly it becomes like a religion to them...

Never that... Why would I wish someone harm? The simple thing is, all the cites you have been given, the ones I have read, and following the thought through ...point to the most likely fact that it like the rest will have the same outcome... Until sign is given to them to prevent language...

And those that do not have these results, the majority, what of them? They have denied language so long that psychological damage is done? Thought no harm was worth anything?

Of all the things that were written you go again to using the least amount of gray matter...

I do not assume things, it is rude and leads to many errors of judgment... much like you have displayed here... when you grow up and can actually discuss a topic that require minimal intelligence I will be happy to discuss this matter with you then...

And at the cost of many more harmed than it will ever benefit...

and?

hmm ... are you aware of expiation means? I mean really... check it and let me know what you are actually trying to say...

yep... for clarity, you see, I assume nothing... so if you want me to try and guess your exact issue, not going to happen... my private life is my own, what you assume is your problem...

possibly... however Ah... nope... no we do not... here is an aspect of where we differ... you see a lack, where I do not... Which is perfectly fine, nor the issue all depends on how you look at it... Which is fine... I mean sure you do not look at where the money goes but then again there...