Heinous

[kokonut]

I think aborting deaf babies is perfectly acceptable. Parents shouldn't be burdened unnecessarily with a deaf child.
/sarc/

 

[Jiro]

I didn't know all that. She said they can't cope with a deaf baby. I see there could be more reasons for them to abort.

yes. completely understandable. that's why based on previous experiences, I know better to take one's word with a grain of salt because it's always fallible when it comes to people. Your mother is a nurse... not a doctor so nurse does not know the entire details of it but the patients' doctors do so she may have drawn a conclusion from bits and pieces.

There was a classic psychology study. Find 3 witnesses who have observed same incident and you'll get 3 different testimonies.... proving that witness is the most unreliable source in trial. Loftus and Palmer (both are psychologists) demonstrated that witnesses' memory and testimonies can be affected/manipulated by leading questionings.

 

[Jiro]

Could you for once not playing games and re-read post #224, which is addressed to you, and give a logical answer because post#240 sure as hell is not logical.

I'm sorry if you cannot understand it. I've tried my best and unfortunately, I cannot make everybody happy.

 

[Mimsy]

yes. completely understandable. that's why based on previous experiences, I know better to take one's word with a grain of salt because it's always fallible when it comes to people. Your mother is a nurse... not a doctor so nurse does not know the entire details of it but the patients' doctors do so she may have drawn a conclusion from bits and pieces.

.

Yes, that seems to be what happened. Thanks for correcting me.

 

[TXgolfer]

for proving me right. Supreme Court has ruled this case on the basis of women's right to privacy..... not whether or not if abortion was legal or not.... or abortion based on right to privacy... thus ruling state's anti-abortion law as unconstitutional for violating women's rights to privacy.

How obtuse! and nice spin again.

 

[Jiro]

Yes, that seems to be what happened. Thanks for correcting me.

I'm not correcting you. I'm just speculating but I think what I just said is pretty logical because I find it very hard to believe that somebody would opt for an abortion simply because it will be deaf. I knew there's gotta be something more to it because the technology does not exist yet to determine whether or not if it will be deaf.

It's very common that when a fetus is stricken with something, it will be born deaf or blind or mentally-retarded or deformed or all together. Thankfully enough - we do have a technology to see if fetus has a medical condition or not at genetic level.

 

[Mimsy]

I volunteer in an animal shelter and this topic reminds me of when a lady came in with a pregnant cat. She wanted the vet to give the cat an abortion shot so that she woulodn't have to deal with keeping the kitties or the trouble of finding homes for them. Very sad when it was done. I cried and cried. It just felt so wrong,

 

[rolling7]

I'm sorry if you cannot understand it. I've tried my best and unfortunately, I cannot make everybody happy.

Why not stop tring to make anyone happy and just post a logical answer?

 

[Foxrac]

Why not stop tring to make anyone happy and just post a logical answer?

Do you agree with definition about Roe v. Wade on wikipedia?

I found his post to be most logical but I don't know why someone quibbled about Roe v. Wade.

 

[Jiro]

Why not stop tring to make anyone happy and just post a logical answer?

see previous post. I'm sorry you're not getting any answer you prefer from me. and I'm sorry if facts I have given you has made you feel uncomfortable.

 

[Jiro]

I volunteer in an animal shelter and this topic reminds me of when a lady came in with a pregnant cat. She wanted the vet to give the cat an abortion shot so that she woulodn't have to deal with keeping the kitties or the trouble of finding homes for them. Very sad when it was done. I cried and cried. It just felt so wrong,

abortion shot? never heard of it.

but what you just said above....

 

[Foxrac]

see previous post. I'm sorry you're not getting any answer you prefer from me. and I'm sorry if facts I have given you has made you feel uncomfortable.

Yup, it is tough for pro-lifers to accept that abortion is legal.

I don't see battle between pro-choice and pro-life will be over.

 

[Jiro]

Yup, it is tough for pro-lifers to accept that abortion is legal.

I don't see battle between pro-choice and pro-life will be over.

that's ok. pro-lifers will continue to lose for many years. I'm not very concerned about it. not even slightest.

 

[kokonut]

I volunteer in an animal shelter and this topic reminds me of when a lady came in with a pregnant cat. She wanted the vet to give the cat an abortion shot so that she woulodn't have to deal with keeping the kitties or the trouble of finding homes for them. Very sad when it was done. I cried and cried. It just felt so wrong,

And what about unborn babies being aborted and killed?

 

[TXgolfer]

Yup, it is tough for pro-lifers to accept that abortion is legal.

I don't see battle between pro-choice and pro-life will be over.

Incorrect, we accept the fact that it is currently legal..... What we refuse to accept is that it will always be that way.

 

[Foxrac]

that's ok. pro-lifers will continue to lose for many years. I'm not very concerned about it. not even slightest.

Yup but I'm skeptical about abortion could be under threat in most red states and they passed numerous regulation on abortion. They just want make more tough choice for women to get abortion. The state legislative in Mississippi passed the bill to tighten the license that result in will close one abortion provider so left state as no abortion provider at all. It means women will have go to other states like Alabama to get fetus aborted, however big issue is ugly harassment by anti-abortion protesters. I believe that California or New York are best place to have abortion without any backfire or harassment by stupid, annoying pro-lifers.
Mississippi governor signs bill tightening restrictions on abortion providers - CNN.com

 

[Foxrac]

Incorrect, we accept the fact that it is currently legal..... What we refuse to accept is that it will always be that way.

I'm not saying that you are part of my sentence and I just guess that you may be different on part of pro-life.

 

[TXgolfer]

Yup but I'm skeptical about abortion could be under threat in most red states and they passed numerous regulation on abortion. They just want make more tough choice for women to get abortion. The state legislative in Mississippi passed the bill to tighten the license that result in will close one abortion provider so left state as no abortion provider at all. It means women will have go to other states like Alabama to get fetus aborted, however big issue is ugly harassment by anti-abortion protesters. I believe that California or New York are best place to have abortion without any backfire or harassment by stupid, annoying pro-lifers.
Mississippi governor signs bill tightening restrictions on abortion providers - CNN.com

Abortion will probably be a large factor in the next civil war. Just my guess.

 

[Foxrac]

Abortion will probably be a large factor in the next civil war. Just my guess.

That's just silly.

 

[Jiro]

Abortion will probably be a large factor in the next civil war. Just my guess.

same ole' same ole'. wonder how many times I've heard of that since Roe v. Wade