Omaha Hearing School To Close

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,160
Reaction score
7
Omaha Hearing School To Close - Omaha News Story - KETV Omaha

For nearly six decades, the Omaha Hearing School helped thousands of deaf and hearing impaired students. But this fall, the long-standing school will close.

Declining enrollment means less funding, and the school, which opened its doors in 1952, just couldn’t overcome the deficit shortfall.

“It’s a crying shame. I don’t know how else to put it,” said Monte Schatz, who is a father to two deaf children.

Schatz’s daughters first attended the school eight years ago.

“The hearing school worked extremely hard on their speaking skills, and it also prepared them in the event that their hearing would deteriorate -- that they would be able to do lip reading,” Schatz said.

Both girls are now thriving at St. Margaret Mary’s school thanks to the hard work at the hearing school.

“It also gave them preparation for what it would be like to be partially deaf or deaf in a hearing world,” Schatz said.

“We were taking students with cochlear implants and hearing aids and teaching them how to listen and how to speak using very little, if any, sign language,” said Suzanne Rogert, executive director of the Omaha Hearing School.

Rogert said a huge drop in enrollment has hurt the school’s funding, creating a $250,000 budget shortfall.

“The Omaha Hearing School has been a part of this community for almost 60 years, and having to close our doors this week was an extremely emotional decision for everyone involved,” Rogert said.

Schatz said the school’s closing leaves a void for other young students.

“It definitely eliminates a very viable option for the hearing-impaired community with (the school) not being there,” Schatz said.

The school’s executive director is hopeful the 11 part- and full-time staff can find work in other schools. There’s no word on what will happen to the building, but, Rogert said, she hopes it can be used for education.
 
The name of the school? "Hearing" school? What the....???
 
When I saw the word "Hearing", the first thing comes to my mind is that if it is a deaf school then it is very pro-oral.
 
Yea it is. There was an uproar over their bulletin board advertising..

And now they're closing. lol, good riddance. Not surprised.

yes, a very pro-oral school.
 
sound pre-oral reason hearing because too many people1
 
can-you-hear-me-now.jpg
 
Wow, this is the second oral school that I've heard of being closed! The thing is, that scares me. Now there's no private options for dhh kids in Nebraska. Public schools aren't known for being hotbeds of skilled teachers of the deaf, or of offering good accomondations.
The thing is.....while I do disagree with the oral approach, I do think that private oral only can really offer REALLY good qualified speech therapy. Public schools generally can't.
And check it out.....this isn't one of the expansion schools (one of those "schools" that is basicly an early intervention preschool, expanded from a school like CID/St. Joseph's or Clarke) or a school that only serves profound kids. It's a school that serves ALL degrees of hearing loss......
Gee (sarcasm) I thought that the only kids who needed oral education were profound/CI kids.
 
About 20 years ago, Nebraska closed their school for the Deaf in order to save money and force students to enroll in mainstreaming schools or other schools for the Deaf in neighboring states. Another reason is they felt that the mainstreaming schools with interpreters would be more suitable and affordable.

Oops! Last year or so, they realized that the mainstreaming programs with interpreters were going to cost their department of education about 2.5 times more than school for the Deaf operational budget annually.

Know what they did? They had consolidated some mainstreaming programs and laid off some teachers and interpreters.
 
About 20 years ago, Nebraska closed their school for the Deaf in order to save money and force students to enroll in mainstreaming schools or other schools for the Deaf in neighboring states. Another reason is they felt that the mainstreaming schools with interpreters would be more suitable and affordable.

Oops! Last year or so, they realized that the mainstreaming programs with interpreters were going to cost their department of education about 2.5 times more than school for the Deaf operational budget annually.

Know what they did? They had consolidated some mainstreaming programs and laid off some teachers and interpreters.

Instead of backing up and realizing that they were wrong, and instituting a deaf program.:roll: See, the students are not the bottom line, money is.
 
About 20 years ago, Nebraska closed their school for the Deaf in order to save money and force students to enroll in mainstreaming schools or other schools for the Deaf in neighboring states. Another reason is they felt that the mainstreaming schools with interpreters would be more suitable and affordable.

Oops! Last year or so, they realized that the mainstreaming programs with interpreters were going to cost their department of education about 2.5 times more than school for the Deaf operational budget annually.

Know what they did? They had consolidated some mainstreaming programs and laid off some teachers and interpreters.

About time! I knew that mainstreaming would cost more than a school for the deaf. I only hope that other states that still have school for the deaf will learn from Nebraska.
 
About time! I knew that mainstreaming would cost more than a school for the deaf. I only hope that other states that still have school for the deaf will learn from Nebraska.

So do I, but from my experience, the hearing are very hard to teach, indeed.
 
About 20 years ago, Nebraska closed their school for the Deaf in order to save money and force students to enroll in mainstreaming schools or other schools for the Deaf in neighboring states. Another reason is they felt that the mainstreaming schools with interpreters would be more suitable and affordable.

Oops! Last year or so, they realized that the mainstreaming programs with interpreters were going to cost their department of education about 2.5 times more than school for the Deaf operational budget annually.

Know what they did? They had consolidated some mainstreaming programs and laid off some teachers and interpreters.

The irony!!!!!! And let me guess, the cost is the same when talking abt accomondations for oral kids too (oral 'terps and CART anyone)
And the thing is, what a lot of people are completely and totally missing is that when there's no Deaf School or Dhh program, SO many times kids are basicly lumped in with sped. Sped does not have a good reputation. Also why the hell would any teacher at a typical school in a rural state like Nebraska even have any training in deaf ed?
 
Oh, and the thing is.....I find this amazing that ORAL preschools are closing.
The thing is, even a lot of hoh kids still need catch up in the preschool and kindergarten years. That is even with early aiding. I remember back in 2000's when they were opening the preschool satilites and predicting that it was an area of growth. Looks like the oral bubble burst!
And you know what? I wonder if this might lead to more boarding kids at Clarke. (which is now the ONLY oral deaf boarding school) The oral kids are going to fall through the cracks, and be sent to Clarke. I mean I doubt mainstream ed/sped in Nebraska is all that.
 
About time! I knew that mainstreaming would cost more than a school for the deaf. I only hope that other states that still have school for the deaf will learn from Nebraska.

Really? I was told the opposite; mainsteaming schools are cheaper than Deaf schools. Of course, I probably am wrong on that one. Anybody is more welcome to correct me on that.
 
Back
Top