That was what Lane said, right, about deaf mothers wanting deaf babies the same way that Hispanic mothers want Hispanic babies? That struck me as being a strange comment too, all the way around.
If you think about Mr. Osgood's life (the man who wrote the letter), he is 85 years old now. That means his working life probably stopped about 20 years ago, if he retired at age 65.
Think about 20 years ago. Closed-captioning on TVs was just beginning to become wide-spread. The Internet was still in its infancy. Digital hearing aids were only in initial development. The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed in 1990.
Although he mentions ASL, even if he had learned it, that would not have opened doors for him at work or with his own family and friends, who probably did not know it. It's as isolating as the ability to speak Russian, say, if none of your friends and family speak Russian.
So, for essentially all of this man's adult, working life, he had to cope with hearing loss, and eventual near-deafness, caused by his military service. If he had hearing aids at all, they were analogue aids that would have helped some, but probably didn't have directional microphones, or variable programs. They might have given him problems with feedback, embarassing in a group situation when the user doesn't know his ears are whistling!
Culturally, he was from a generation where the man was expected to be the main breadwinner to support his family. But there were NO employee accommodations that were mandated by law. He had to do the best he could on his own.
So his working life and social life was pre-Internet, pre-captioning, pre-amplified telephones even. He came back to the U.S. as a young returning serviceman, maybe with a family to support, and he is not the man he was when he went in. No wonder he felt frustrated.
I thought his second paragraph in the letter was a very succinct summary of what his life had been like. He is not addressing what life might be like for HoH young people today; he's talking about his own struggles and challenges that were with him after his WWII service. It's incomprehensible to him that someone like Lane might talk about people actually choosing such a life when there is technology available to compensate for it.
He makes sense to me. He certainly doesn't sound ignorant, or insulting to anyone other than Lane, with whom he vehemently disagrees.