US oil company donated millions to climate sceptic groups

Why am I not dumbstruck with disbelief, Boult? :lol:
 
Them water coolers make my office flood every morning. Why do I keep refilling it? I means, obviously I know there's a problem.

Yeah. It highlights the importance of the left hand knowing what the right hand is up to. :lol:
 
Speaking of inaccurate data and the spread of mis/disinformation:

-University of East Anglia e-mails that exposed data destruction, attempts to hide contradictory data, and conspiracies to sabotage the work of skeptical scientists

-The East Anglia CRU threw out their raw data, undermining any effort to check their work
NOAA/GHCN “homogenization” falsified climate declines into increases

-East Anglia CRU’s below-standard computer modeling

-No rise in atmospheric carbon fraction over the last 150 years: University of Bristol

-IPCC withdraws claim that AGW will wipe out Himalayan glaciers by 2035

-IPCC chief Rajendra Pachauri knew Himalayan claim was bogus for months before exposure

-Amazonian rainforest conclusions not based on scientific research but on advocacy group claims

-Mountain glacier claims based on unsubstantiated student theses and anecdotes from climber magazine

-Search of IPCC report footnotes exposes ten more student dissertations presented as peer-reviewed research

-Medieval Warming Period temperatures may have been global, undermining entire AGW case

-Measurements used for AGW case were influenced by urbanization, poor location, bad data sets

-African-crop claims exposed as false

-IPCC researchers excluded Southern Hemisphere data to exaggerate effects of warming on hurricanes

-Hurricane claims further exposed as false by actual peer-reviewed research — including by some AGW researchers

-Major scientific group concludes IPCC-linked researchers “complicit in the alleged scientific malpractices“
 
Speaking of inaccurate data and the spread of mis/disinformation:

-University of East Anglia e-mails that exposed data destruction, attempts to hide contradictory data, and conspiracies to sabotage the work of skeptical scientists

-The East Anglia CRU threw out their raw data, undermining any effort to check their work
NOAA/GHCN “homogenization” falsified climate declines into increases

-East Anglia CRU’s below-standard computer modeling

-No rise in atmospheric carbon fraction over the last 150 years: University of Bristol

-IPCC withdraws claim that AGW will wipe out Himalayan glaciers by 2035

-IPCC chief Rajendra Pachauri knew Himalayan claim was bogus for months before exposure

-Amazonian rainforest conclusions not based on scientific research but on advocacy group claims

-Mountain glacier claims based on unsubstantiated student theses and anecdotes from climber magazine

-Search of IPCC report footnotes exposes ten more student dissertations presented as peer-reviewed research

-Medieval Warming Period temperatures may have been global, undermining entire AGW case

-Measurements used for AGW case were influenced by urbanization, poor location, bad data sets

-African-crop claims exposed as false

-IPCC researchers excluded Southern Hemisphere data to exaggerate effects of warming on hurricanes

-Hurricane claims further exposed as false by actual peer-reviewed research — including by some AGW researchers

-Major scientific group concludes IPCC-linked researchers “complicit in the alleged scientific malpractices“

One group has thrown out data. Do you even know why the data was discarded? You have to be able to answer that question before you can start with the old conspiracy theories again.:roll:
 
Back
Top