Obama Cuts Funding to Democracy Protesters In Iran.

Status
Not open for further replies.
not at all. we will continue to speak out and assist/educate those Iranians who want to learn more about democracy. We will speak loud against their tyranny and violent handling of peaceful protests/rally.

We already do that. It doesn't require funding. Do you have any idea how many Iranians are Western educated?
 
Okay so....

For those who are all for american intervention for Iran. What exactly do you want us to do? Forcibly choose a leader for them? Force them to have a re-election? (what if he wins again?) Take over the election duties? What?

Bingo.
 
it has been happening. it is just a long winding road to freedom

Exactly. It cannot be forced and it cannot be accomplished overnight. It is an internal change that takes a great deal of time to manifest.
 
that is what the protesters are doing. their government is beating them down. support for the protesters is peaceful change

There is absolutely nothing peaceful about what is ocurring in Iran. To support the violent protests supports the violence.
 
And a constitutional monarchy is not a democracy. If it were, it would be called a democracy. Nor is it an absolute monarchy. Hence the label of constitutional monarchy. If it were a democratic monarchy it would be labeled as such. Monarchy does not fit into the concept of democracy at all.
oh boy......

What exactly does that have to do with political rule? We aren't talking about architecture. Stop confusing the two.
didn't you follow what I just said? I did not relate it to political status. Unbeknownst to you - the architecture does serve as a powerful symbol that represents something. That's why they broke down the Berlin Wall. That's why they broke down Saddam statue. That's why Dubai & Chinese built skyscrapers.

Skyscrapers represent capitalism and freedom. Islamic Fundamentalists despise that. That's why Al Qaeda destroyed our WTC.

No, I didn't miss the majority of the artice. I read the whole thing. And it does not support your claim that Kuwait is a democracy.
yes it did support my claim. Kuwait does have a form of democracy. Why is it mentioned NUMBER of times in that article I just provided?

Growing more democratic does not mean that they are a democratic government.

Exactly. And they have not gotten there yet. They are still a constitutional monarchy.
Oh yes it's getting there! :cool2:

You have proven nothing of the kind.
oh well. I can bring cow to water but I cannot make cow drink it :wave:
 
he shouldn't have cut funding.

stand for freedom obama, stand for freedom

not at all. we will continue to speak out and assist/educate those Iranians who want to learn more about democracy. We will speak loud against their tyranny and violent handling of peaceful protests/rally.

Oh... so basically, you want to say "you suck!!!" and get paid for it?

Honestly, do you think the probability of a rally changing things outweighs the dangerous aspect of it (angers Iranians, bad connections, violent eruptions, and so on)?
 
There is absolutely nothing peaceful about what is ocurring in Iran. To support the violent protests supports the violence.

huh? it was a peaceful protest that were being violently taken down by Basijis and riot police.
 
Exactly. It cannot be forced and it cannot be accomplished overnight. It is an internal change that takes a great deal of time to manifest.

the internal change can only occur when the variable is removed (the tyranny). You think MLK's ideal went thru change without violence?
 
Check on what? That Kuwait is not a democracy? I've already provided you a link.

They are using a parliamentary democracy like Canada which also have a constitutional monarchy as they elect fifty members of parliament every four years. It is not like the U.S. democracy which use a federal constitutional republic system as their kind of government system.
 
We already do that. It doesn't require funding. Do you have any idea how many Iranians are Western educated?

and do you have any idea how many of them were arrested and "disappeared"?
 
The Iraqis don't need our help to be liberated. If that's what they want, their people should fight for it themselves. It is not our place to dictate what a country's policies should be.

So you prefer to see them being murdered by Saddam and his thugs if he were still alive?
 
There is absolutely nothing peaceful about what is ocurring in Iran. To support the violent protests supports the violence.

look at the riots during our civil rights movement.... it wasn't all hugging going on...
 
Oh... so basically, you want to say "you suck!!!" and get paid for it?

Honestly, do you think the probability of a rally changing things outweighs the dangerous aspect of it (angers Iranians, bad connections, violent eruptions, and so on)?

same question can be asked for MLK and look where it brought us to - a better place. 50 years later... Obama... a black man (well half) is now the President of United States :)
 
oh boy......


didn't you follow what I just said? I did not relate it to political status. Unbeknownst to you - the architecture does serve as a powerful symbol that represents something. That's why they broke down the Berlin Wall. That's why they broke down Saddam statue. That's why Dubai & Chinese built skyscrapers.

Skyscrapers represent capitalism and freedom. Islamic Fundamentalists despise that. That's why Al Qaeda destroyed our WTC.


yes it did support my claim. Kuwait does have a form of democracy. Why is it mentioned NUMBER of times in that article I just provided?


Oh yes it's getting there! :cool2:


oh well. I can bring cow to water but I cannot make cow drink it :wave:

You used a newspaper article. Hardly anything more than opinion. And it in no way supports the fact that Kuwait is a democracy.

I try to follow you, Jiro, but you end up going in circles and making yourself dizzy.

And you have misquoted again. It's a horse not a cow. The quote is "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." Which is actually a pretty good quote to apply to the situation in Iran currently, if you have any understanding whatsoever of the metaphor.

Please, please, show me a reputable political treatise that lists Kuwait as a democracy. When you have done that, you will have supported your claim. Until then, the political treatises and historical documents all classify Kuwait as a constitutional monarchy. As does your newspaper article.
 
look at the riots during our civil rights movement.... it wasn't all hugging going on...

No it wasn't. And the vast majority of the violence came from the oppressors, not those demonstrating for peaceful change. March on Selma is a prime example.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top