Windows 7 Release Candidiate

I still use Win 7 (32 bit) on my laptop since Jan 2009. Right now, I have RC.

I love it. Not feeel like go back to XP because Wifi. Win 7 is easier to automatic wifi at re-visit place.

Chevy57 - better not install Win 7 - I am not sure 100 percent support your built-in web cam

Nathan - I tried to install P3 software in my laptop with Win 7 BETA. Stop install at Printer. P3 can't find printer then exit without complete install. As soon, I will try install printer then install P3 software.

Last winter, I tried install Win 7 on Intel P4 HT Dual Core (desktop) with older graphic card (GeForce 4600 or 4800 Tii). Too slow to run and cramp on graphic card.
 
I still use Win 7 (32 bit) on my laptop since Jan 2009. Right now, I have RC.

I love it. Not feeel like go back to XP because Wifi. Win 7 is easier to automatic wifi at re-visit place.

Chevy57 - better not install Win 7 - I am not sure 100 percent support your built-in web cam

Nathan - I tried to install P3 software in my laptop with Win 7 BETA. Stop install at Printer. P3 can't find printer then exit without complete install. As soon, I will try install printer then install P3 software.

Last winter, I tried install Win 7 on Intel P4 HT Dual Core (desktop) with older graphic card (GeForce 4600 or 4800 Tii). Too slow to run and cramp on graphic card.

I agreed with you. Windows Xp is worse ever I had for WIFI. I use OSX's WIFI and 100000x times better than Windows XP also mostly Linux are better than XP too.
 
Last Thursday (May 21), we were on NJ Turnpike (on way to Rutgers University for graduation day). We were in the car. I sat at rear and use my laptop. I know that Bolt Bus Service has offer free Wifi. I saw Bolt bus at near our car. I can pick wifi from Bolt Bus. Just check my Stock (Wall Street) and email.

Win 7 gave me quick to set up better than XP's wireless network.
 
I have install the WIndows 7 32-bit to check out if same issue has applied about Aero theme then I found it's true, same issue has applied too.

It only work with graphic drivers from ASUS website and it was ASUS but it was old and some games aren't good performance with this driver.
 
Microsoft readies new maximum specs for Windows 7 netbooks.

5-22-09win7start.jpg


Microsoft is readying a set of maximum specs for Windows 7 netbooks –or, as Microsoft prefers to call them, “small notebooks” — that will likely dictate which PCs will qualify for lower per-copy Windows 7 pricing.

The alleged Windows 7 netbook specs were published earlier this month on the TechARP technology enthusiast site.

Microsoft established a similar set of specs for XP and Vista netbooks, a category the company had been referring to as ultra-low-cost PCs (ULPCs). The ones it is developing for Windows 7 are designed for netbooks that have smaller screens and single-core 2 GHz CPUs, TechARP said.

(Just to be clear: Microsoft’s Windows unit isn’t confirming any of the information that TechARP is providing and updating regularly about Microsoft’s alleged plans for Windows 7. But a lot of what the site is getting surely seems plausible — and if I were guessing — is coming directly from OEMs.)

A quick refresher as to what Microsoft has said to date about Windows 7 on netbooks:

* All Windows 7 SKUs will be able to run on netbooks. But the ones Microsoft expects most netbook makers to preload are Windows 7 Starter Edition and Windows 7 Home Premium.

* Starter Edition will limit users to running three concurrent applications. Windows 7 Starter Edition, unlike XP Starter Edition, will be for sale to users in both developing and developed nations.

* Microsoft has not shared publicly what it intends to charge PC makers per copy of Windows 7. But it is said to be charging them about $15 a copy for XP when they are preloading it on netbooks — a price significantly lower than it charges PC makers per copy of XP or Vista preloaded on full-fledged laptops and PCs.

When Microsoft unveiled its Windows 7 SKU line-up back in February, I asked how the company intended to determine pricing for Windows 7 running on netbooks vs. laptops/desktops. Would Microsoft charge PC makers less per copy for Home Premium than it charges to run the exact same Home Premium SKU on a full-fledged notebook or desktop system? Would Microsoft attempt to establish itself as the judge of what is a “netbook”?

Microsoft officials had nothing more to say about my questions. But the new maximum spec list — if it pans out — may indicate how the Softies are planning to address these thorny questions.

TechARP claims Microsoft is planning to focus its strategy around SKUs tailored for the netbook market. The site says that Microsoft will be offering netbook makers plain-old Windows 7 Starter; Windows 7 Starter for Small Notebook PC; and Windows 7 Home Basic For Small Notebook PCs (China only). (Microsoft officials said in February that Windows 7 Home Basic will be in developing nations only.)

For Windows 7, “Microsoft has made several critical changes to the maximum hardware specifications allowed for Windows 7 Start / Home Basic editions, as well as the Windows XP and Windows Vista Small Notebook PC program,” TechARP said. Among these changes are:


“(A) greatly simplified and universal CPU criterion designed for easy understanding and management
Removal of the graphics and touch limitations
Limiting screen size to a maximum of 10.2 inches (measured diagonally) as the defining boundary between a Small Notebook PC and a full-featured laptop”
Specifically, according to TechARP’s information, Microsoft’s maximum specs for machines it will consider to be netbooks/”small notebooks” will change in the following ways:

Screen size: With XP and Vista, maximum allowable screen size was 12.1 inches; with Windows 7, it will be 10.2 inches

Storage: Maximum limits for XP and Vista: 160 GB HDD or 32 GB SDD; with Windows 7, it will be 250 GB HDD or 64 GB SDD

Graphics: With XP and Vista, netbooks/small notebooks was “less than or equal to DX9; with Windows 7, there will be no limitation

CPUs: With XP and Vista, netbooks/small notebooks had to have “single core processors that do not exceed 1 GHz frequency, or Intel Atom (N270, N280, 230, Z500, Z510, Z515, Z520, Z530, Z540, Z550); Intel Celeron 220; AMD (MV-40, 1050P, TF-20, Geode LX, Athlon 2650e, Sempron 210U); VIA (C7-M ULV, Nano U1700, U2250, U2300, U2400 or U2500). With Windows 7, the maximum will be “single core processors that do not exceed 2 GHz frequency, and have a CPU thermal design power that is less than or equal to 15 W, not including the graphics and chipset.”

Recent reports claim netbook demand is down — which is a mixed blessing for PC makers and Microsoft, given that netbooks have been the only bright spot in an otherwise declining PC market. Whether that trend will continue through the Windows 7 launch this year will be interesting to see. I know I’m still planning on making my first Windows 7 machine a netbook.
 
just installed it last nite. i actually like it better than vista. it seems less bloat and less buggy (ironic, huh?)

I just have a few minor complaints about it but other than that... so far, so good. I haven't set it up for development purpose yet...
 
I have Windows 7 32 bit and have no problem with video card. Seem everything running fine.
 
I have Windows 7 32 bit and have no problem with video card. Seem everything running fine.

This issue is only applies to ASUS notebook with GeForce 9650m GT, it required to use specified driver by ASUS.
 
I reformatted the hard drive and reinstalled Windows XP last week because Windows 7 eat all my hard drive and I only left is about 248Mb in hard drive :shock: So I still plan order 1TB later. I notice Windows 7 is faster than Windows XP but I can wait to get Windows 7 on March 2010, right?
 
I reformatted the hard drive and reinstalled Windows XP last week because Windows 7 eat all my hard drive and I only left is about 248Mb in hard drive :shock: So I still plan order 1TB later. I notice Windows 7 is faster than Windows XP but I can wait to get Windows 7 on March 2010, right?

You need disable the recovery point and you will get alot of GB back.
 
I reformatted the hard drive and reinstalled Windows XP last week because Windows 7 eat all my hard drive and I only left is about 248Mb in hard drive :shock: So I still plan order 1TB later. I notice Windows 7 is faster than Windows XP but I can wait to get Windows 7 on March 2010, right?

official date - October 22
 
Thanks and do you know how much cost for Windows 7?

unknown for now but I'm very positive that Microsoft will offer this at extremely attractive price because after all - we bought their ridiculously flawed Vista at ridiculous price. MS owes us.
 
Back
Top