EU slaps a record fine on Intel

Foxrac

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
44,471
Reaction score
448
U Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes says Intel 'took advantage of their position'

Computer chipmaker Intel has been fined a record 1.06bn euros ($1.45bn; £948m) by the European Commission for anti-competitive practices.

It dwarfs the 497m euro fine levied on Microsoft in 2004 for abusing its dominant market position.

The Commission found that between 2002 and 2007, Intel had paid manufacturers and a retailer to favour its chips over those of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

Intel has announced that it will appeal against the verdict.

"Intel takes exception to this decision. We believe the decision is wrong and ignores the reality of a highly competitive microprocessor market," Intel chief executive Paul Otellini said.

"There has been absolutely zero harm to consumers. Intel will appeal," he added.

The fine was welcomed by AMD, which had lodged complaints in 2000, 2003 and 2006.

"The EU decision will shift the power from an abusive monopolist to computer makers, retailers and above all PC consumers," said Giuliano Meroni, AMD's European president.

'Sustained violation'

The Commission said that Acer, Dell, HP, Lenovo and NEC had been given hidden rebates if they only used Intel chips.

It also found that Media Saturn, which owns Europe's biggest consumer electronics retailer Media Markt, had been given money so that it would only sell computers containing Intel chips.

"Intel has harmed millions of European consumers by deliberately acting to keep competitors out of the market for computer chips for many years," said Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes.

"Such a serious and sustained violation of the EU's antitrust rules cannot be tolerated."

Last year, Intel made 80.5% of the microprocessors in PCs, while AMD made 12% of them.

The Commission has also ordered Intel "to cease the illegal practices immediately to the extent that they are still ongoing".

In addition to providing rebates to manufacturers that bought almost entirely Intel products, the Commission found that the chipmaker had paid them to postpone or cancel the launch of specific products based on AMD chips.

'Wall of resistance'

Ms Kroes joked in her own news conference that Intel would now have to change its latest advertising slogan from "sponsors of tomorrow" to "the sponsor of the European taxpayer".

Both Intel and AMD are based in California. Intel has 83,900 staff worldwide and has a market value of $85.4bn.

AMD employs about 11,000 people and has a market value of $2.6bn.

"Despite its strong defence, Intel is facing a wall of regulatory resistance to its business practices around the world, with antitrust infringement decisions against it now in Japan, Korea, and the EU, while the US authorities are investigating Intel as well," said David Anderson, a lawyer at Berwin Leighton Paisner.

"It is a major decision that shows the Commission is serious about curtailing abusive behaviour of dominant companies, especially in the high-tech sector."

BBC NEWS | Business | EU slaps a record fine on Intel
 
I'm not surprised about stupid anti-trust law in EU.
 
Intel has been around longer than AMD - it makes sense that Intel would be more widely used than AMD. However, it is wrong to pay under the table to sell strictly your product and to keep another competitor's product off store shelves. Shame on Intel for abusing their power over smaller companies to keep the competition from having a fair race.
 
Why do you think USB is the standard despite how inferior it is to Firewire?

Yep, because Intel developed USB and forced it upon everybody.

I will always prefer Firewire, no matter what.
 
Why do you think USB is the standard despite how inferior it is to Firewire?

Yep, because Intel developed USB and forced it upon everybody.

I will always prefer Firewire, no matter what.

I would prefer firewire, too. Apple is slowly phrasing out firewire on their Macs...the Macbooks don't have firewire, but Macbook Pro only has one firewire port same as the Intel iMac used to have 2 firewire ports now has 1. I think most people find USB devices cheaper, which is why firewire devices are kind of expensive for the general consumer market. Thanks to Intel forcing things into the market, but I love the processors anyhow.
 
Why do you think USB is the standard despite how inferior it is to Firewire?

Yep, because Intel developed USB and forced it upon everybody.

I will always prefer Firewire, no matter what.

There's one problem for you, there's not much choice to strength the Firewire due expensive on consumer market and no way to kill USB.

I prefer firewire for external HDD to watch video because USB did choked alot of CPU, however I just transfer it into main HDD to watch it.

My PC has 2 firewire port, both of them are 400 and my MBP still have 2 firewire too, I noticed new redesigned MBP has one firewire.

What are you think about eSATA?
 
I remember about firewire and they are still heavily used in professional, such as graphic design, film and hard encoding in video on Mac.
 
I remember about firewire and they are still heavily used in professional, such as graphic design, film and hard encoding in video on Mac.

They are. I can tell you that without hesitation.
 
They are. I can tell you that without hesitation.

I believe that firewire would still survive for long time, they are working on 1600 and 3200 but probably offered on some Mac model, such MBP, iMac or Mac Pro.

I'm not going get away from Mac since I still love Mac, unlike as I said before.
 
Back
Top