AllDeaf.com
Mobile - Perks - Advertise - Spy - Who Quoted Me  
Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Hearing Aids & Cochlear Implants
LIKE AllDeaf on Facebook FOLLOW AllDeaf on Twitter
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:06 PM   #1
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Deaf Education research......

Very interesting .

Quote:
Research at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf is shifting the way deaf students are being educated. Recent research suggests that even with qualified interpreters in the mainstreamed classroom, educators need to understand deaf children learn differently, are more visual, and often process information differently than their hearing peers.

Research Findings at NTID

A popular assumption in education for many years was that deaf students are the same as hearing students except that they simply don't hear. But research at RIT's NTID is contradicting that belief, and consequently altering the way deaf students are being taught.

"We're changing the face of deaf education around the world," says Dr. Marc Marschark, professor and director of NTID's Center for Education Research Partnerships (CERP). "You can't teach deaf kids as though they are hearing kids who can't hear. It's not about ears and it's not about speech versus sign language. It's about finding their strengths and needs. The historical approach to deaf education simply doesn't work well enough to get deaf students where they need to be."

Through the center's research, thousands of deaf and hard-of-hearing students-from children as young as five to college students-have been tested in Australia, the Netherlands, England, Scotland, and on the RIT campus in Rochester, N.Y., to determine how they acquire new knowledge and how that knowledge is organized, understood, and communicated to others. Studies involve everything from tracking eye movements and performing memory tasks to attending experimental "classes" taught by deaf and hearing teachers.

For hearing children, a flood of information arrives constantly from background noises, ambient conversations, even words heard on the television. Deaf children may not have the same opportunities to learn through hearing, but they have different opportunities, Marschark points out.

But does it matter whether the child has deaf or hearing parents? Whether the child uses sign language or his or her voice? Whether the child uses a cochlear implant?

Recent research findings show:

* The deaf students who perform best academically usually are the ones whose parents have effectively communicated with them from an early age.
* Children who sign early on generally outperform those who do not sign during their early school years.
* Early language skills-both American Sign Language and spoken language- correlate with reading ability, with no evidence that one is necessarily better than the other.
* Most deaf students' difficulties in reading are mirrored by difficulties in understanding sign language.
* Deaf and hard-of-hearing children entering school often are lagging behind hearing children in their knowledge of the world, number concepts, and problem-solving skills, not just in language.
* Deaf students do not always learn, think, or know in the same ways as hearing children.

CERP's Origins

CERP occupies much of the north wing of the first floor of the Mark Ellingson Residence Hall and has a laboratory and office area in Peterson Hall. Five of the 10 staff members are graduates of NTID's master of science program in secondary education; five are nationally certified sign language interpreters. All of its funding- more than $6 million so far-is from grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and contracts or gifts from foundations, U.S. organizations, and foreign governments.

CERP has roots as early as 2002, when it was awarded its first NSF grant to study factors thought to influence deaf students' learning through sign language and barriers that hinder classroom learning. The following year, a second NSF grant was awarded for research to study communication and technological barriers to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education for deaf and hard-of-hearing students.

"One thing we found in our early studies is that despite what some people claim, deaf students' difficulties in mainstreamed classrooms could not be blamed on interpreters," says Marschark. "We started realizing some differences between deaf and hearing students: how their memory works, the organization of their knowledge, and their learning strategies are simply different. So for mainstream teachers, you can't assume the deaf students coming into your class know the same things or learn the same way as your hearing students. For example, deaf people's visual-spatial memories are better than hearing people's. But sequential memory isn't as good."

For decades, expectations of education for deaf students have been lower than for their hearing peers. Fifty percent of deaf and hard-of-hearing students graduating high school in the U.S. read at or below fourth-grade levels.

But research by Marschark and others shows that how much hearing one has doesn't predict how much they'll learn, either as children or adults. "Whether you use a hearing aid or a cochlear implant or are a native signer who uses ASL, they each have advantages," he says. "But by the time they're in college, all of that is washed out. Their experience has leveled it out."

History of Deaf Education

Deaf children for centuries have not been educated as well as their hearing peers. Still today, there are no schools or provisions for teaching deaf children in many countries.

Prior to the advent of television and wireless pagers, deaf people in the U.S. used to gather at clubs or on street corners to share the latest news in sign language. Then a movement grew to educate deaf children orally and encouraged (or forced) them to use their voices.

In 1960, linguist William C. Stokoe recognized American Sign Language as a bona fide language, complete with its own syntax and linguistic features. More schools started to utilize American Sign Language as the language of instruction.

The Americans with Disabilities Act, signed into law in 1990, also marked a change in education for deaf and hard-of-hearing children. More parents of deaf children were sending them to mainstreamed schools, which are required to provide necessary accommodations to ensure their education. That could include interpreters in the classroom, but qualified interpreters weren't always found, especially in rural areas.

Today, Marschark says 86 percent of deaf students in the U.S. are in mainstreamed programs all or part of the day. In many cases, they are the only deaf or hard-of-hearing student in their school.

"Mainstreamed teachers think that if they remove the communication barriers they can teach their deaf kids as though they are hearing kids. Now that we've discovered some of the differences in how deaf and hard-of-hearing students learn, we want to know how to turn that knowledge into more effective teaching strategies. We're in a position to educate parents and mainstream teachers about how these kids are different. Using the memory example, given their difficulties of retaining sequences, if you arrange material visually and spatially, deaf kids would do better."

Marschark is taking his research out of the laboratory and into classrooms and lecture halls around the world. He gives invited presentations to parents, teachers, and other professionals more than 20 times a year and has written several books on the subject. Marschark and his colleagues gave nine presentations in July 2010 describing various aspects of their findings at the Inter national Congress on the Education of the Deaf (ICED) in Vancouver, B.C.

In 2009, CERP launched a website intended as a clearinghouse for objective answers to questions about raising and educating a deaf child. To date, dozens of questions have been asked and answered on the site, which has had more than 50,000 visitors from around the world.

Many of his findings today about deaf students' learning would not have been politically correct to utter just a few years ago, he says.

"Five years ago we thought the same thing, but we didn't have the evidence. Now we know it's true," he says. "In the past, saying things like this upset people. But the climate has changed. People are accepting that differences don't mean deficiencies. Now people better accept their strengths and weaknesses."

Today, fewer schools specializing in education for deaf students exist. And several have been eyed for closure in the near future due, in large part, to dwindling enrollments.

"Rather than closing them, we need more programs that understand how to educate deaf kids," Marschark says. "The mainstream as it exists now is not necessarily the best place for many deaf students. Sure, a kid doing OK in the mainstream will stay there. But he could be a star in another setting. The status quo is not good enough."

Changing Attitudes

A lot of parents think that if their deaf child learns sign language, it will interfere with learning to speak.

"Not true," says Marschark. "Early sign language actually can support later spoken language for children with or without cochlear implants."

And his research shows that if a deaf child knows English as well as sign language, he or she tends to do better academically, socially, and with language development.

"Literacy is a big challenge," Marschark says. "For 100 years, we've made very little progress at improving deaf kids' reading. Current research suggests that we've been looking in the wrong place. The reading problem is not about reading. It's about comprehension. They learn just as much from what they read as what is signed or spoken. It's counterintuitive for many people, I know, but the evidence is very clear."

Just as there were varying opinions on whether deaf students should sign or speak, more recent controversy existed with the improvement of technological advances and cochlear implants (CI). More than 275 students at RIT/NTID currently have CIs, which enable them to hear some sounds. For years, implants were controversial in the Deaf (the uppercase D denotes those who see themselves as part of a linguistic-cultural minority) community, especially for young children with hearing parents. Many were afraid those children would never be exposed to sign language or their rich cultural history.

"We're not interested in the political or the philosophical. We're sensitive to those issues, but we're trying to figure out how we can best support learning in the classroom for students of all ages," Marschark says.

Dr. Louis Abbate, president and CEO of the Willie Ross School for the Deaf in Longmeadow, Mass., said CERP's research was looked at when the school rewrote its mission five years ago. The school, founded in 1967, used to stress only oral communication for its students. Now, with an integrated campus, they need the flexibility to teach students orally or in sign language or both.

"We needed the flexibility to respond to the needs of each student," Abbate said. "Marc was the first person we went to when we wanted to look at our communication model." Abbate has often referred parents to CERP's website: "The answers are very balanced and very reasonable. We use that all the time. So many parents are faced with either/or decisions early on, and they usually get pushed in one direction. Marc's work is balanced. It talks about the value of different approaches and how they can be integrated with one another."

Dr. James DeCaro, interim president of NTID, says CERP's work is an asset to the field of education of the deaf and to RIT/NTID.

"Marc continues to build the pre eminent research center in our field addressing these important teaching and learning issues," DeCaro said. "We are lucky to have him here at RIT."
posts from hell is offline  
Alt Today
All Deaf

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:10 PM   #2
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Interesting pointers:
  • Children who sign early on generally outperform those who do not sign during their early school years.
  • "Whether you use a hearing aid or a cochlear implant or are a native signer who uses ASL, they each have advantages," he says. "But by the time they're in college, all of that is washed out. Their experience has leveled it out."
  • "The mainstream as it exists now is not necessarily the best place for many deaf students. Sure, a kid doing OK in the mainstream will stay there. But he could be a star in another setting. The status quo is not good enough."

This is all proven research.. For #2 - it simply shows even if you have a CI/HA or are just deaf... You're as equal as the deaf when you hit college.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:11 PM   #3
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Do you see that it says:

" Early language skills-both American Sign Language and spoken language- correlate with reading ability, with no evidence that one is necessarily better than the other."
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:14 PM   #4
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
Do you see that it says:

" Early language skills-both American Sign Language and spoken language- correlate with reading ability, with no evidence that one is necessarily better than the other."
Yup. So why do you insist on the spoken language? ASL is as good.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:14 PM   #5
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
Yup. So why do you insist on the spoken language? ASL is as good.
Uhhhh, my daughter uses ASL.... Where have you been?
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:15 PM   #6
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
Uhhhh, my daughter uses ASL.... Where have you been?
Nice twist.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:15 PM   #7
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
Yup. So why do you insist on the spoken language? ASL is as good.
The point is that EITHER language works, so why judge someone who choose one vs another?
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:17 PM   #8
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
The point is that EITHER language works, so why judge someone who choose one vs another?
I am not judging on language basis. I'm judging on the attitude that is being taken.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:18 PM   #9
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
I am not judging on language basis. I'm judging on the attitude that is being taken.
Then it wasn't aimed at you. There are plenty who disagree and say that ASL should be mandated and that spoken language alone should not be an option.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:19 PM   #10
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
Then it wasn't aimed at you. There are plenty who disagree and say that ASL should be mandated and that spoken language alone should not be an option.
If it is aimed at another member of the deaf community, it's also aimed at me.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:20 PM   #11
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
If it is aimed at another member of the deaf community, it's also aimed at me.
I'm saying that if the research shows that both languages work equally well, either language should be an option and no one should be judged for their decision.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:22 PM   #12
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
I'm saying that if the research shows that both languages work equally well, either language should be an option and no one should be judged for their decision.
I agree with that, however:
Did you see where it says deaf kids who sign outperform these who dont?

I think that is more important than debating which is better asl/english.

I am not here for "good enough"
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:23 PM   #13
AlleyCat
Registered User
 
AlleyCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my time zone
Posts: 12,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
Did you see where it says deaf kids who sign outperform these who dont?

I think that is more important than debating which is better asl/english.

I am not here for "good enough"
I did find that interesting. (The bolded part.) I think I can say it applies to me too!
AlleyCat is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:25 PM   #14
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
I agree with that, however:
Did you see where it says deaf kids who sign outperform these who dont?

I think that is more important than debating which is better asl/english.

I am not here for "good enough"
And no one here has ever said that ASL was a bad thing. (There are plenty who say that spoken languae damages kids.)
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:25 PM   #15
GrendelQ
4117′00″N 7004′58″W
 
GrendelQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 3,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
If it is aimed at another member of the deaf community, it's also aimed at me.
Does that mean you've got my daughter's back, too?
GrendelQ is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:27 PM   #16
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrendelQ View Post
Does that mean you've got my daughter's back, too?
Of course. If someone is going to put things into a negative sense for her, I'm there to show the person the light.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:30 PM   #17
Tousi
Registered User
 
Tousi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
Of course. If someone is going to put things into a negative sense for her, I'm there to show the person the light.
The door'd be better.
Tousi is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:31 PM   #18
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by tousi View Post
the door'd be better.
:p
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:32 PM   #19
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
And no one here has ever said that ASL was a bad thing. (There are plenty who say that spoken languae damages kids.)
*shrugs* We all know that there is nobody that said ASL was bad.. However the indicators are there that people think its better to ship their kids off to an oral school...

Which in all respect this research disproved.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:34 PM   #20
deafgal001
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
*shrugs* We all know that there is nobody that said ASL was bad.. However the indicators are there that people think its better to ship their kids off to an oral school...

Which in all respect this research disproved.
Too many proofs as well.
deafgal001 is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:35 PM   #21
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
*shrugs* We all know that there is nobody that said ASL was bad.. However the indicators are there that people think its better to ship their kids off to an oral school...

Which in all respect this research disproved.
Actually, there is no reason that you can not utilize ASL and an oral school. I know several Deaf families who choose to send their children to oral schools. (As well as ourselves and some other hearing families.)

The research says that those who sign from an early age do the best, it has nothing to do with what school they attend.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:36 PM   #22
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
Actually, there is no reason that you can not utilize ASL and an oral school. I know several Deaf families who choose to send their children to oral schools. (As well as ourselves and some other hearing families.)

The research says that those who sign from an early age do the best, it has nothing to do with what school they attend.
Oral schools dont use sign language, yes?
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:37 PM   #23
faire_jour
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
Oral schools dont use sign language, yes?
So? The research doesn't say that ASL has to be the only language or even the primary language.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:42 PM   #24
sheila022
Registered User
 
sheila022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,538
Send a message via AIM to sheila022
Lol, well, I'm seeing that this thread is saying I suck b/c I never used ASL growing up.
__________________


sheila022 is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:46 PM   #25
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
So? The research doesn't say that ASL has to be the only language or even the primary language.
This research says: kids who use sign language out perform these who dont. Simply said.

The research or myself are not saying it has to be the ONLY language. If the said child who was in oral school all their life and was decently successful, they would be much more successful using their strengths to learn. In this case: Visual strengths.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:47 PM   #26
posts from hell
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheila022 View Post
Lol, well, I'm seeing that this thread is saying I suck b/c I never used ASL growing up.
In no way this research is saying that.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:52 PM   #27
deafgal001
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheila022 View Post
Lol, well, I'm seeing that this thread is saying I suck b/c I never used ASL growing up.
You do excellent no matter what communication method you used. If you lived in my generation where CI was rare and sometimes unheard of. And your parents used ASL, does this mean you wouldn't be where you are today?
deafgal001 is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:53 PM   #28
sheila022
Registered User
 
sheila022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,538
Send a message via AIM to sheila022
Quote:
Originally Posted by posts from hell View Post
This research says: kids who use sign language out perform these who dont. Simply said.

The research or myself are not saying it has to be the ONLY language. If the said child who was in oral school all their life and was decently successful, they would be much more successful using their strengths to learn. In this case: Visual strengths.
I long already knew visual is one of my strengths long time ago and I used it often when doing homework or learning about stuff over the years.

Would it have been better if I went to a school for the deaf instead of some regular public school?
__________________


sheila022 is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:54 PM   #29
sheila022
Registered User
 
sheila022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,538
Send a message via AIM to sheila022
Quote:
Originally Posted by deafgal001 View Post
You do excellent no matter what communication method you used. If you lived in my generation where CI was rare and sometimes unheard of. And your parents used ASL, does this mean you wouldn't be where you are today?
I have no clue where I would be now if my parents had used ASL when I growing up. Maybe different life and college? It's kinda moot now, isn't it? Lol.
__________________


sheila022 is offline  
Unread 11-23-2010, 11:55 PM   #30
deafgal001
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,542
only you know what you are capable of.
deafgal001 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

AllDeaf proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2002-2014, AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.