Principal to parents: Take kids off Facebook

sara1981

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
71
Principal to parents: Take kids off Facebook
Principal to parents: Take kids off Facebook - CNN.com

In a move likely to earn him few Facebook friend requests from tweens, a New Jersey middle school principal is calling for parents to yank their children from all social-networking sites.

Anthony Orsini sent an e-mail blast to the Benjamin Franklin Middle School community in Ridgewood, New Jersey, on Wednesday, urging parents to take down their children's online profiles on Facebook and elsewhere.

"There is absolutely no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site!," he wrote. "Let me repeat that - there is absolutely, positively no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site!"

After issuing a rallying cry --"It is time for every single member of the [school] Community to take a stand!" -- Orsini enumerated the reasons he opposes social-networking by his students.

The main problem, he wrote, is that tweens do not have the resilience to withstand internet name-calling.

"They are simply not psychologically ready for the damage that one mean person online can cause," he said.

His school's guidance counselors for years now have been mediating spats that originated online, Orsini said. The last straw for him was students' growing use of Formspring, a social-networking upstart where members ask and answer questions about one another.

Orsini singled out the site for scorn in his e-mail to Ben Franklin Middle School parents, calling it a "scourge" that exists "simply to post mean things about people anonymously."

"The nicest thing you see [on it] is, 'Jane is a slut,'" he said In a phone interview with CNN.

Formspring did not reply to a request for comment on the principal's campaign.

A Facebook spokesman pointed out that many middle school-age children are formally barred from the site. "We prohibit children under the age of 13 from using Facebook both for safety reasons and to comply with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act," the spokesman said.

In his e-mail, Orsini also warned parents that the casual cruelty of an unsupervised 12-year-old online is a more realistic threat to their children than the oft-raised specter of sexual predators.

"The threat to your son or daughter from online adult predators is insignificant compared to the damage that children at this age constantly and repeatedly do to one another through social networking sites," he wrote.

In recent years Facebook, MySpace and other social-networking sites have been blamed for the suicides of teenage girls in Missouri, Massachusetts and New York. Parents complained the girls were traumatized by nasty comments posted on the sites.

Inez Bunza, the parent of a student at the Ridgewood, New Jersey, school, said she agreed with the principal's point, but her daughter was "completely up in arms" when she broached the possibility of shutting down her Facebook account Wednesday. She said she remains hopeful they can hammer out "an amicable solution."

Orsini says that, on the whole, parental response to his e-mail has been overwhelmingly positive, and that parents as far away as Israel and Korea have e-mailed him to say, "thank you for saying something."

Fans of Orsini's zero-tolerance philosophy toward student social-networking can also friend him on Facebook, of which he is a member.

i would agreed with posts..
 
Til they are of legal age. Teenagers in general are naive and easy to lure. They have a tendency to post a lot of compromising images which would affect their reputation and reduce their chances of landing a decent job later in life.

More and more job applicants are being screened these days and Facebook is an useful resource, provided that many people aren't aware of their privacy settings.
 
Funny, you put more stock on the legal age, which is 18 here, for FB than the allowed driving age (supervised) at 15.
 
Noting the irony on putting more stock on the use of FB that should be at legal age (which is 18 in the US) than for driving age which is 15 (supervised) or 16 (unsupervised).
 
Noting the irony on putting more stock on the use of FB that should be at legal age (which is 18 in the US) than for driving age which is 15 (supervised) or 16 (unsupervised).

Facebook and driving age are just apple to orange.
 
I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I agree that kids really don't have any reason to be on FB UNSUPERVISED, but I don't see an issue with a teenager having monitered time on FB. If the parents are aware of what is going on, there really ISN'T an issue. Bad things can happen, yes, but bad things also can happen anywhere.

So, I think I agree with Koko. Some truth to it mixed in with hype for a good read. A good dose of common sense should be what is practiced.
 
Frankly, I don't believe a law should be passed making it illegal for minors to go on Facebook. There's too many laws as it is. Facebook need to change their policy. Right now, I believe it is set at 13 and above with parental consent (a questionable method).

The best thing for a parent to do is to not put a computer in a child's bedroom where it cannot be supervised 24/7. Not even these softwares where parents can set up limited internet access because they aren't foolproof.

Also, the parents should always look at their child's profile on a daily basis and ensure that they are not given limited profiles.
 
My son keeps asking me to let him go on facebook and he's only 11. I know some of his friends are on it, but I think he's far to young. Kevin.
 
Children should have no business being on Facebook and other networking websites, since it can attract pedophiles anyway.

Probably no more than attracting pedophiles at children playgrounds. I believe supervision is the key as well as being aware of what's going on. Some kids are more mature than others. It's really up to the parents to decide, not you. It's good to have some sort of social pressure on FB to grant better protection for kids.
 
Probably no more than attracting pedophiles at children playgrounds. I believe supervision is the key as well as being aware of what's going on. Some kids are more mature than others. It's really up to the parents to decide, not you. It's good to have some sort of social pressure on FB to grant better protection for kids.

I was just stating my opinion. And besides, I WILL be a parent one day, anyway, so, I can decide for MY future children. So, STFU.
 
Children should have no business being on Facebook and other networking websites, since it can attract pedophiles anyway.

What if a parent allows their kid on there supervised? I'm not keen on the idea of superceding parent authority; especially on something like this.
 
Back
Top