MilitaryGirl83
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 3,605
- Reaction score
- 0
But dang.. leave RebelGirl alone!
Thank you!But dang.. leave RebelGirl alone!
Not really, no. It is not the same as "jumping to conclusions" because jumping to conclusions indicates that you have not been provided sufficient information to form a justifiable conclusion. In the case you are referencing, both sides of the story had been addressed, therefore my conclusion was an informed one.
Tousi said:Tousi Come on, debate, don't hate. This constant one-upmanship business is getting old and has no redeeming value.
Come on, debate, don't hate. This constant one-upmanship business is getting old and has no redeeming value.
Why don't you show it? Here, enjoy http://www.alldeaf.com/current-events/38178-toddlers-temper-ousts-family-plane.html
I have nothing to be ashamed of. I don't feel it is appropriate for parents to subject others to their children's misbehavior in confined spaces (ie airplane, restaurant, etc.). That is my opinion and I am just as welcome to my opinions as you are to yours.
Not only that, I was able to base my opinion on this specific incident on input from both parties (airlines AND parents), so I feel I was able to reach an informed conclusion.
The parents had their say and I still felt that they did not handle the situation appropriately after viewing BOTH sides of the situation.
It makes no difference. Yes, you jump to conclusion in your thread because the medias says so and then label a child as spoil brat and negative mother´s discipline skill without think twice where temper tantrum come from.
That is not the same as "jumping to conclusions".