Liza
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2003
- Messages
- 4,356
- Reaction score
- 3
Levonian said:Sickle cell anemia is a perfect example of what I’m talking about. People who have sickle cell anemia are immune to malaria. Even if left untreated, sickle cell anemia usually allows its host to live well into their mid-twenties. Malaria on the other hand, will decimate a population, with substantial numbers of victims dying in childhood. You can see, therefore, that sickle cell anemia was at one time in our evolutionary history a very strong pro-survivalist trait. The populations who had the sickle cell mutation lived long enough to pass on their genetic material, whereas the non-sickle cell populations didn’t survive to reproductive age. Which is why the genome is still widespread in certain populations. Now that malaria has been more or less controlled through modern technology, sickle cell anemia is now considered to be an undesirable disease. The same may be true of deafness. Now that the evolutionary need for deafness has been eliminated, deafness is now also considered to be an undesirable condition. Since modern technology has eliminated the threats that these genetic variations provided protection against, it is technology which has made these genetic mutations ‘diseases’, not the conditions caused by the mutations themselves.
I have enjoyed reading your posts in this thread. Makes sense! Necessity sure propels evolution as well as how we look at certain genetic traits over time.