"Cochlear Implant or Stem Cell Therapy--Which?"

KristinaB

Emotional Mess
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
14,503
Reaction score
21
Got this in an email e-zine today.

Not that I agree - but I'm just putting it out there for any who may be interested.

"Cochlear Implant or Stem Cell Therapy--Which?"

by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.


A man wrote, "I read your article 'Hair cell regeneration--
looking beyond the hype' which was very encouraging.
Currently, my hearing has been severe to profound since age
13. I'm 48 now, but I've worn a hearing aid since I was three.

I am now in the process of undergoing a cochlear implant. In
the meantime, I'm still researching other options to improve
my hearing. I've heard or read a lot of negative things
regarding cochlear implants such as equipment failure,
increased tinnitus, loss of residual hearing, expensive, etc.

My doctor is confident I will benefit from the cochlear implant
and that it should improve my hearing much better than
currently. This is very encouraging. However, something is
drawing me to hold off. I'm wondering if there is something
better out there. It seems that stem cell therapy sounds more
promising. I fear that I will regret having the cochlear implant
when I should have been more patient and waited for the stem
cell therapy.

I've read that other countries are performing clinical trials but
none here in the USA--but I'm not sure if these reports are just
hype or are real.

Would you care to give me your opinion on stem cell therapy.
Perhaps I'm wasting my time thinking about the stem cell
therapy?"

I have written a couple of articles regarding hair cell
regeneration. You mentioned my article “Hair Cell
Regeneration–Looking Beyond the Hype” (November, 2004)
Hair Cell Regeneration for Hard of Hearing People—Looking Beyond the Hype. In
addition I have written, “Hair Cell Regeneration–Overcoming
the Challenges.” (November, 2004)
Hair Cell Regeneration—Restoring Hearing Loss?.

As you have read, yes, research on hair cell regeneration by
using stem cells is progressing, but no, it is not there yet.

There have been a few recent reports floating around the
Internet of a college girl, Chloe Sohl, that had stem cell
therapy with supposedly spectacular results.

You can read one of these reports, "Stem cell therapy raises
hope for autoimmune hearing loss" at
Stem cell therapy raises hope for autoimmune hearing loss.

Another of these "reports" paints stem cell therapy as
wonderful, and that it is the stodgy FDA that prevents it from
happening in the USA right now. This report is entitled "Stem
cells for deafness begins human trials? Great news!" You can
read it at A deaf dude's life: Stem cells for deafness begins human trials? Great news!.

These articles make it seem like stem cell therapy is already
here and is working great. This is just not true. Yes, they are
experimenting on people in countries where they don't have
strict medical standards, but the results are not all what they
are glowingly painted to be. There are still SERIOUS side
effects that need to be overcome. Before you get sucked in
by all the hype, read the article "Dose of Reality: Beware of
Clinics Touting Stem Cell Panaceas" at
Dose of Reality: Beware of Clinics Touting Stem Cell Panaceas | Magazine.

So far, I've only heard of this one "success" story using stem
cells to improve hearing--and the funny thing is that there is no
corroborating evidence from any other stem cell researchers
supporting this. Thus, I have to think there are numerous
issues that are not being told. If it was a true medical
breakthrough, I'd have expected lots of attention about this
case by the media and other stem cell researchers--but that is
singularly lacking. Thus you need to be very cautious at this
point.

Personally, I think you'd be wise to not even consider stem
cell therapy until it is approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) here in the USA. When that happens,
you can be more confident that it will be a good option for you.

As I have pointed out, using stem cell therapy safely to
restore hearing is still likely 20 years (more or less) away. It is
NOT imminent at this point.

For a more realistic view of where stem cell research is at,
read my recent article, "Hair Cell Research--Some
Unexpected Results" (December, 2009)
Hearing Loss Help Hair Cell Research?Some Unexpected Results.

Furthermore, from everything I've read so far, stem cell
therapy isn't the cure for hearing loss that it is made out to be.
Yes, hearing gets somewhat better--but nowhere near back to
normal. So far they are talking about a 10 to 20 dB
improvement (which is definitely a step in the right direction),
but you'd still be very hard of hearing. Hopefully, they will find
ways to improve on that in the future.

Thus, at present, for example, if you have a profound hearing
loss at say 100 dB--you could expect your hearing to improve
to maybe 80 dB with stem cell therapy, which would bump you
up to the severe hearing loss class. That's better, but not
good.

In contrast, with today's cochlear implant (CI) technology, you
could expect your hearing to improve all the way up to 20 to
30 dB. That's in the normal range, and that's really good!

Thus the CI is still the only real option you have today. True,
you will find a few people have problems with their CIs, but the
vast majority say that in spite of any problems, if they had it to
do over again, they would do it again in a heartbeat. That's
how satisfied they are with their cochlear implants. Something
like 98% or more report "success" with their CIs--which is a
pretty good success rate.

Based on my knowledge of the results of hundreds and
hundreds of people I know that have received CIs, I agree
with your doctor. You do have a good chance of getting
more/better hearing than you have now. It is probably well
worth the risk.

Although stem cell therapy sounds promising, this technology
is not ready for the big time. There are still far too many
unknowns, whereas the CI technology is proven to work.

Since you are worried that stem cell therapy may help you in
the future, here's one solution for you to consider. Why not
have a CI in your worse ear NOW, and wear your hearing aid
in your better ear. THEN, if and when stem cell therapy has
been proven, and approved by the FDA, you could have it
done in your better ear and still wear the CI in your worse ear.

That way you could get the best of both worlds--be able to
hear better now, and possibly hear much better later.
 
There will always be something better than the choices we make. Like buying a car or a camera.

This man has to make difficult choices in his life and only he can make them for himself.
 
Yes, stem cells are just SO far in the future that it's not even funny. Besides, in all liklihood, it will only help autoimmune caused hearing loss. Not nessarily hearing loss in general. Stem cells (via bone marrow transplants) ALREADY help quite a number of autoimmune disorders. (boy in bubble disease for example)
I have to say that CIs and hearing aids will still be around for years and years and years.
 
Yes, stem cells are just SO far in the future that it's not even funny. Besides, in all liklihood, it will only help autoimmune caused hearing loss. Not nessarily hearing loss in general. Stem cells (via bone marrow transplants) ALREADY help quite a number of autoimmune disorders. (boy in bubble disease for example)
I have to say that CIs and hearing aids will still be around for years and years and years.

Agreed. More likely years after I am dead when it will help those with hearing loss.
 
More likely years after I am dead when it will help those with hearing loss
And it's still in question over whether or not it may help. There was a post a while back from someone whose mom had MS or something simlair. She said that a few years ago everyone was saying that stem cells would cure MS. People got treated but there was no response.
They've been claiming that a cure was on the verge for years and years now. I think stem cells are just the new hype.
 
And it's still in question over whether or not it may help. There was a post a while back from someone whose mom had MS or something simlair. She said that a few years ago everyone was saying that stem cells would cure MS. People got treated but there was no response.
They've been claiming that a cure was on the verge for years and years now. I think stem cells are just the new hype.

Point well taken.....May never work. So, I agree with you about what we have now will last into the future.
 
CI or stem cells I HATE both but if I had to pick one I would go for ci. but it will be years before I make that choice.
 
Current trials of stem cell treatment of heart disease in my city. I hope that it's promising. Heart disease treatment is important and may help a lot of people. If these trials are successful, maybe other treatments may be developed. Maybe it will help my kids' generation.
 
thank you Neil, clarifying that stem cells is still far off! oy! Now will some folks quit obsessing? haha.

I'd still pick CI over stem cells for myself. :)
 
I'm glad the answer to the question in the OP is a realistic one. Of course I'm sure we all think it would be great if it was all figured out and was available right now. But the research really is still in baby land. Even if tomorrow the headlines on the front page of the news paper reads "Born deaf has been given perfect hearing with stem cell treatment" would still mean years and years of observation. Lots of clinical testing before it's even something the FDA will look into passing. There will even be political and religious debates standing in it's way.

So in my opinion those who are waiting for this to be available will be in for a long wait and even if they can someday get this done they'll be missing out on at least a couple of decades of sound that they could have been enjoying already. Having recently had my first CI activated I can say that I wouldn't want to have waited 20+ years to experience what I'm experiencing right now. Knowing what I know now I would have been very upset if I have waited that long.

Ron Jaxon
 
Nothing wrong with that. It's a matter of choice. No matter what is put in front of me it's my decision to get it or not.

But, having lived the first half of my life hearing and the last half deaf. I knew what I was missing so I wanted it back.
 
Current trials of stem cell treatment of heart disease in my city
YAY!!!! I think that as of right now we need to focus on finding a cure for REAL diseases and disorders like Alizheimers, heart disease, diabetes, mental illnesses etc,
With some funding for late deafened/late blind research of course.
You know, something I just thought of...... could it be that the stem cell advocates meant that only autoimmune caused hearing loss could be treated by stem cells, and the general public took that to mean that ALL hearing loss could be treated by stem cells?
Anybody know if the majority of late deafened folks have hearing loss caused by autoimmine disorders? Maybe that's why there's such excitement......
 
As Dr. Cotanche explains, “We know that mammal cochlear hair cells will not regenerate on their own when the native hair cells are lost. But experimental models have shown that we can induce some levels of regeneration by stimulating genes that cause cells to divide. So we do see an initial burst of hair cell regeneration, but then the ear somehow senses that these new hair cells are not normal—that this should not happen—and eliminates these cells.”

A long road to go.... It is not what the Mexico, China stem cell clinic claimed that easy.
the ear somehow senses that these new hair cells are not normal—that this should not happen—and eliminates these cells.”
 
Back
Top