Clay Aiken is GAY!

By the way sweetie.. Clay didn't win on American Idol, It was Ruben Studdard. Get your fact straight. :) The final two contestants were Ruben and Clay.

If you proved your point then why is it necessary for him to announce that he is gay on American Idol?
 
Based on album sales surpassed only by Idol winners Kelly Clarkson and Carrie Underwood, Aiken has become the most successful male and the most successful runner-up in that show's history
Click to expand...

He had more success than Ruben regardless if Clay win Idol or not. i would be more impressed if clay comes out when he was performing but it took few years for him to announce after he realized his star power is fading in holloywood. What a douche bag.
 
Who cares how long it took him to say that he's gay, it's now out in the open, so get over it, lumbingmi.
 
By the same token, who cares if he s queer or not? Don't get this new over your head, Cheri.
 
society's_child said:
Pbbbhhht...this is not news. It's about time he came out with it (no pun intended).

A sad day for Clay-Mates, I'm sure.:cry:
Click to expand...

Exactly. Did he really need to make a statement? Its kind of making a statement regarding the obvious.:giggle:
 
Byrdie714 said:
No different than you coming onto AD and announcing about your trans-gay brother.....:roll:
Click to expand...

You dont know who I am nor my brother. that s difference. Clay make jackass of himself by getting himself on front of of People's Weekly with his son.
 
lumbingmi said:
You dont know who I am nor my brother. that s difference. Clay make jackass of himself by getting himself on front of of People's Weekly with his son.
Click to expand...

What's the difference is my point.

What's the difference between you announcing about your brother and Clay?

Nothing.
 
lumbingmi said:
You dont know who I am nor my brother. that s difference. Clay make jackass of himself by getting himself on front of of People's Weekly with his son.
Click to expand...

You don't know Clay nor his lifestyle. "That s difference"
 
Byrdie714 said:
What's the difference is my point.

What's the difference between you announcing about your brother and Clay?

Nothing.
Click to expand...

I am not proud of announcing about my brother. Clay's attention whore and his pride is what make him to announce that he is queer. that s difference. But its pointless to argue. I m saying Clay is douchebag. That is all.

Bryanz said:
You don't know Clay nor his lifestyle. "That s difference"
Click to expand...

Newsflash - Clay s douchebag.
 
lumbingmi said:
I am not proud of announcing about my brother. Clay's attention whore and his pride is what make him to announce that he is queer. that s difference. But its pointless to argue. I m saying Clay is douchebag. That is all.



Newsflash - Clay s douchebag.
Click to expand...

M.O.O. that he is a 'douchebag'.

I just object to him holding his son with the announcement that he is gay on the cover. The son didn't need to be subjected to it.
 
Byrdie714 said:
M.O.O. that he is a 'douchebag'.

I just object to him holding his son with the announcement that he is gay on the cover. The son didn't need to be subjected to it.
Click to expand...

I agree on that, Byrdie. That was a publicity stunt. I don't particularly object to his announcing that he is gay, although I don't think it was necessary, as I can't imagine that there are many who didn't already recognize that. I do however, think that the manner in which he chose to do so was ill conceived. His sexuality really shouldn't be a concern for anyone.
 
Byrdie714 said:
M.O.O. that he is a 'douchebag'.

I just object to him holding his son with the announcement that he is gay on the cover. The son didn't need to be subjected to it.
Click to expand...

M.O_0 ?

But you gotta to hand it to him that he want to 'normalize' gay culture by holding son to show it is okay to be gay father and have kid.
 
lumbingmi said:
M.O_0 ?

But you gotta to hand it to him that he want to 'normalize' gay culture by holding son to show it is okay to be gay father and have kid.
Click to expand...

It was selfish, and not intended to normalize anything. It was a promotion stunt.
 
jillio said:
I agree on that, Byrdie. That was a publicity stunt. I don't particularly object to his announcing that he is gay, although I don't think it was necessary, as I can't imagine that there are many who didn't already recognize that. I do however, think that the manner in which he chose to do so was ill conceived. His sexuality really shouldn't be a concern for anyone.
Click to expand...

***nodding agreement***
 
lumbingmi said:
M.O_0 ?

But you gotta to hand it to him that he want to 'normalize' gay culture by holding son to show it is okay to be gay father and have kid.
Click to expand...

M.O.O.= Matter Of Opinion.

He is only speaking for himself and not for thousands of other gay/lesbian parents.

BTW.....what is 'normal'?
 
jillio said:
It was selfish, and not intended to normalize anything. It was a promotion stunt.
Click to expand...

Yea he is attention whore.

Byrdie714 said:
M.O.O.= Matter Of Opinion.

He is only speaking for himself and not for thousands of other gay/lesbian parents.

BTW.....what is 'normal'?
Click to expand...

I dont see anything wrong with him holding son. Every father should be proud to display his son/daughter to public even if the intention is not up to our standard.
 
Back
Top