- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 44,482
- Reaction score
- 448
So, now you backpedal?
I'm not sure that you use this word correctly.
You brought up about "tolerance", not me.
So, now you backpedal?
Here - a "human" couple you support:
'I've married my sister - now we're having our second baby': Siblings who defied law plan to start new life abroad | Mail Online
The problem with marrying a sibling (or other family member) -- for me, is not at all about the issue of incest -- it is that the idea of sex and conception with those you share close DNA with is not a good idea. There are higher risks of birth defects. Is that fair to the child that's born as a result of that marriage? I'm surprised you feel we should tolerate that type of marriage.
Apparently, toleration deadends when it comes to opposing same-sex marriage. People who state their opposition to same-sex marriage are not tolerated, and are mocked and bullied.
Bullying either side is not right.I got bullied for support gay marriage at high school.
Bullying either side is not right.
To "be against" something includes speaking out in public and voting. That's the way it's done in America.Tolerating an opposing view isn't the issue. It is when people try to impose their view on the law, that is what's intolerable. Be against it all you like, it is absolutely your right. However, let others live how they want as well and have legal rights.
To "be against" something includes speaking out in public and voting. That's the way it's done in America.
It's debatable as to whether or not it constitutes a civil right. Also, even civil rights come with restrictions.I agree! However, you shouldn't be able to vote on what civil rights a person (who is not harming anyone) can and cannot have.
It's debatable as to whether or not it constitutes a civil right. Also, even civil rights come with restrictions.
Finally, even if something is lawful that doesn't mean it's moral, and people should be free to say so.