Ariz. sheriff launches immigration sweep

Status
Not open for further replies.

Maria

Active Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
10,305
Reaction score
0
Ariz. sheriff launches immigration sweep
By JACQUES BILLEAUD (AP) – 20 hours ago

SURPRISE, Ariz. — An Arizona sheriff known for cracking down on people who are in the country illegally launched a crime and immigration sweep in northwestern metro Phoenix on Friday, a half day after officials in Washington limited his powers to make federal immigration arrests.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose sweeps have led to allegations of racial profiling, said the rebuff from Washington won't stop him. He said he can still arrest immigrants under a state smuggling law and a federal law that gives all local police agencies more limited power to detain suspected illegal immigrants.

"It doesn't bother me, because we are going to do the same thing," said Arpaio, whose deputies had arrested 16 people by Friday evening on unspecified charges. "I am the elected sheriff. I don't take orders from the federal government."

The officers were participating in a federal program that grants a limited number of local police departments special powers to make immigration arrests and speed up deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement stripped Arpaio of his power to let 100 deputies make federal immigration arrests, but renewed another agreement that allows 60 jails officers to determine the immigration status of people in jail.

The sheriff's sweeps in some heavily Latino areas of metro Phoenix have drawn criticism that Arpaio's deputies racially profile people. Arpaio said people pulled over in the sweeps were approached because deputies had probable cause to believe they had committed crimes and that it was only afterward that deputies found many of them were illegal immigrants.

The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating Arpaio's office over allegations of discrimination and unconstitutional searches and seizures.

"He is doing this to thumb his nose at the Obama administration," said Lydia Guzman, president of the Hispanic civil rights group Somos America.

The sweeps have discouraged some Hispanics who have witnessed or been victims of crime to refuse to call Arpaio's deputies, for fear of mistreatment, Guzman said.

Observers who are part of Guzman's group fanned out across the area of the sweeps with video cameras to record exchanges between deputies and motorists.

Arpaio said volunteers will use cameras owned by his agency to video-record deputies so viewers can see for themselves that they weren't doing anything wrong. Arpaio responded angrily to a question during a news conference about the costs of the cameras, saying they were paid through seizures in drug cases. "Dope peddlers bought the cameras," Arpaio said.

A dozen anti-Arpaio protesters yelled throughout the news conference. At one point, they chanted: "Order equals K-K-K — here's what Arpaio has to say."

Kris Kobach, a law professor at the University of Missouri at Kansas City and an advocate of expanding local immigration efforts, said Arpaio's office — like every other local police agency — can detain people suspected of immigration violations for a day or two until federal authorities come to pick them up.

In the past, Arpaio could have held such immigrants for longer than two days and conducted investigations of smuggling rings, Kobach said.

"It's really a slight narrowing, but it's not much," said Kobach, who worked as an immigration law adviser to then-U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft from 2001-2003.

Dan Pochoda, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing people who filed a lawsuit over the sweeps, said Arpaio still can't pull over motorists solely because they are suspected of being illegal immigrants.

"He can't do it under the terms he is claiming. He has indicated that he can stop people without the suspicion, based on what they look like, what they sound like," Pochoda said.

Arpaio said the Bush administration had no complaints about his use of the special federal powers, but all that has changed with the Obama administration.

"What's changed?" Arpaio asked. "Politics has changed, because they don't like us going on the streets to catch illegals."

This round of sweep, Arpaio's 12th, is set to end late Saturday.

The Associated Press: Ariz. sheriff launches immigration sweep
 
If they did that here all of our service industries would shut down, and fast. Last week imigre walked into our fave Mexican food place. There was a fast shift change of waitresses and only one cook was left, they had to wait longer than anyone before they got seated. They were only there to eat, come back guys!

No, I am not joking, just facts of life when you are only two hours from the border. No one here cares (or seems to). We are all friends or relatives anyway. (maybe a bit of both?) (joking)
 
Sherriff Joe is at it again.:roll: He needs to take some time off and deal with his issues.
 
A sweep in my area would take a majority of the people.

The way to stop illegal employment is not a sweep. The answer is simple. Prosecute the employers who hire undocumented workers.
 
A sweep in my area would take a majority of the people.

The way to stop illegal employment is not a sweep. The answer is simple. Prosecute the employers who hire undocumented workers.

And Mexico improves the economy.
 
A large portion of the money earned in the US is wired back to Mexico. People come here to earn money to support family in Mexico. A read that wire transfers are way down.

The economic crisis has hurt immigrants hard here. When I went to a predominantly Hispanic area a while back, I was shocked at the changes. Many of the mom and pop stores were gone. Evil Wal-mart opened a Super Mercado which will hurt any small businesses. People were sitting/living on the sidewalks of abandoned store fronts. People were pushing shopping carts going who knows where. It's very sad.
 
doing all these "sweeps" is putting a band-aid on the "issue". U.S. business policies such as 'free trade' help to provide the conditions which perpetuate poverty in countries like Mexico and lead to people trying to leave; the vast majority of produce here is picked by documented and un-documented workers, often living in risky or not-so-favorable conditions w/little or no access to health care. The United States has history of promoting immigration and "development" for certain groups and not for others, including the illegal seizure and violations of treaty rights of Native lands, so it's ironic that here in this article is discussed "illegals".
As far as racial profiling, I'm sure it happens in this instance - it happens elsewhere as well-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top