2004 Presidential Election

JOEBIALEK

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
I received an email the other day entitled "He's done more damage than we thought" (author unknown) which is a list of failures attributed to President George W. Bush. After careful research and analysis to verify authenticity, I have come to the conclusion that the American people will fire George W. Bush on November 2, 2004 and hire John Kerry by a landslide of votes. I will summarize this list and comment where appropriate.

A. Foreign Policy

1. "Bush is the first president in US history to order a US attack AND military occupation of a sovereign nation, and did so against the will of the United Nations and the vast majority of the international community." While it is true that Congress authorized the President to invade Iraq, the fact that U.S. intelligence was so conflicting brings into question the judgment of Bush. I too was wrong in pushing for the removal of Hussein rather than staying focused on Bin Laden and the other terrorist organizations. Further, it is doubtful that Hussein could have developed WMD under the watchful eye of U.N.weapons inspectors and regular sorties flown by U.S. fighters throughout the no-fly zones (not to mention satellite surveillance). Kerry will need to initiate reconciliation through an international summit of European and Middle Eastern nations to begin the process of cleaning up this mess in Iraq (and worldwide). After the summit, the world will witness the slow withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and the quick advancement of U.N. troops into Iraq.

2. "Bush recklessly put U.S. soldiers in harms way by invading Iraq in search of weapons of mass destruction which still have not been found." In doing so, he has compromised the war on terrorism by directing 200 billion dollars for an overt combat operation as opposed to a covert operation. The United States has lost over 1,000 soldiers and thousands more are severely maimed prompting some to ask: hey hey GWB, how many kids will it be? The wiser choice would have been to invest 50 billion dollars in covert operations and 50 billion in homeland security. Besides, using conventional troops to fight terrorists is similar to the British army using regulars to fight French guerrillas during the Revolutionary War. Consequently, volunteerism for U.S. military service has sharply declined for all branches prompting rumors of a draft. Kerry will need to redirect resources to enhance homeland security while getting many more nations to share in troop and money commitments overseas especially in Iraq. He will also need to push Saudi Arabia and China to administer sanctions against Iran and North Korea to prevent further nuclear proliferation. Most importantly, however, he will need to fight terrorists overseas through covert operations.

B. Domestic Policy

1. "Bush spent the U.S. surplus and shattered the record for the biggest annual deficit in history." Bush's tax cuts to the wealthy along with irresponsible subsidizing of the war in Iraq has taken the U.S. budget from dark black to bright red all in the span of four years. Another four years of this squandering will bankrupt the United States. The remaining 100 billion dollars (from above) could have been invested in domestic programs like health care, education and the infrastructure. Kerry will need to revoke the tax cuts for the rich and reduce the United State's financial/military commitment in Iraq. These two changes (along with others) should result in a balanced budget in four years with the possibility of a return to a budget surplus in eight years.

2. "Bush entered office with the strongest economy in US history and in less than two years turned every single economic category heading straight down. His first two years in office resulted in 2 million Americans losing their jobs AND he cut unemployment benefits for more out-of-work Americans than any other president in US History." His presidency has been the most "in-your-face" support of the wealthy whether it be tax cuts, the lack of an energy and environmental policy, failure to crack down hard on corporate corruption etc. Kerry will need to bring back former Clinton advisor Robert Ruben to turn the economy around just as was done after the failed administration of Bush Sr. Kerry will need to fast-track the operationalizing of alternative energy sources in order to reduce U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil specifically and world oil in general. As a former prosecutor, he will need to push for long-term prison sentences for those committing white-collar crimes and reduce the difficulty of prosecuting the likes of Ken Ley.

Conclusion

The failures by George W. Bush, the viable alternative of John Kerry, the massive number of newly registered voters, the amount of attention being given by the American people on this election and the mass media trying to spin this race as being close are all clear signs of a Kerry landslide. On the November 2, 2004 the people will speak loud and clear.
 
I already know about all the details.. We have pretty much have brought up a lots of those information in this forum in couple threads. Kerry has my support.:)
 
Thanks for the post.
Absolutely, it is going to be a Kerry landslide.
My only concern is that there will be a "convenient" nuclear attack on one of our major cities any time from now till the election. General Tommy Franks has repeatedly warned that in the event of a "terrorist attack", our Constitution will be scrapped in favor of a military form of government.
Bingo, Bush stays in power, and the loss of, say, 2 million people means just one half of one percent of our USA population, an acceptable loss.
 
Last edited:
Beowulf said:
Thanks for the post.
Absolutely, it is going to be a Kerry landslide.
My only concern is that there will be a "convenient" nuclear attack on one of our major cities any time from now till the election. General Tommy Franks has repeatedly warned that in the event of a "terrorist attack", our Constitution will be scrapped in favor of a military form of government.
Bingo, Bush stays in power, and the loss of, say, 2 million people means just one half of one percent of our USA population, an acceptable loss.
Hmm... that would be something to watch from my room! ;)
 
School's out!
 

Attachments

  • bomb.jpg
    bomb.jpg
    8 KB · Views: 4
Security Council members deny meeting Kerry
By Joel Mowbray
SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

U.N. ambassadors from several nations are disputing assertions by Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry that he met for hours with all members of the U.N. Security Council just a week before voting in October 2002 to authorize the use of force in Iraq.
An investigation by The Washington Times reveals that while the candidate did talk for an unspecified period to at least a few members of the panel, no such meeting, as described by Mr. Kerry on a number of occasions over the past year, ever occurred....
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041024-110609-9428r.htm
In other words, Kerry made up the whole story.
 
Bush FAILED IN IRAQ!!!

Bombshell for Bush: 350 tons of explosives go missing in Iraq

Bush LOST 350 tons of explosives because U.S. soldiers don't guard them and U.S. military organization is very poor.

350 tons of explosives = nuclear bomb

Possibly, terrorists have them and use them for other strike in the United States.

If you still support Bush then your brain can be foggy.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world...sp?story=576048

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/...htm?POE=NEWISVA

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004...8667728052.html
 
Back
Top