Deaf view on a CI kid... its a bummer..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cloggy when you say and that has to change. It sounds alot like you are saying that everyone has to change to the POSITIVE view of a CI.

The good thing about these discussions is that everyone gets a view and that everyone gets to have their opinions known. This is good for any new parent trying to choose a course of action when finding they have a deaf child.

Some people are accusing others of needing reassurances on their decisions. Isn't that exactly what this board is all about? Supporting each other? No matter what the decision was?

I do agree that we do need to calm down and start making our posts alot more productive than the accusations that fly around here.

The gist of the matter is, most people here are more concerned with the oral-only approach that is USUALLY taken when a CI is implanted. I happen to agree with them. I am an implantee, I know signs, and I can speak well. There is nothing wrong with having EVERY tool available. The CI is a good thing as it does provide hearing in ALOT of the cases. However, if with the CI that a child or an an adult chooses to go the oral-only route, then I would say they are LOSING a wonderful opportunity just to learn our beautiful language. I'm not saying that sign is the only language, but really what's wrong with learning it and using it with our children? If your an adult implantee,sure you may never use it, but at the same time, sign is a good thing. I loved it most when I was talking with my deaf friends and didnt want someone else to know what I was saying. I also like the fact that I can sign to someone across a crowded noisy room and know that we will understand each other.

Many of you, if you ever meet me. Hearing or deaf. Would not realize I wasnt either one. Meaning, I talk so well you would think I was hearing. I sign well enough to pass as a Deaf person. So, as you can see, implantees can fit in both *worlds*.

Many of you talk about giving your child every advantage and opportunity there is out there. If that's the case, I would like you to picture another deaf person coming in to your child's place of business in the future, and finding that your child can sign. Imagine your child owning that business, because of a simple little thing such as knowing signs, your child just made a lifelong customer.

I had that above experience happen to me when I was a manager at a food store. We had a deaf customer come in and when that deaf customer found out that someone could communicate with him there, without the need to write things down. He told my boss, because of that, our store was the only store he would shop at from now on.

So, if you truly wanna give your children every advantage and opportunity in life, sign should be a part of it, as well as a good speaking voice.

As for the implant or not to implant debate, this is a debate that is felt on way too many personal levels. I understand both sides. And I really don't think it would hurt any of us to walk a mile in each other's shoes.

Cloggy, I understand your reasons for implanting Lotte, and Im very glad to hear she is doing so well. But more importantly, I am very glad to hear that you made sign a part of her upbringing as well as focusing on the oral. That is an IDEAL child implant parent.

However, I ask that you also take and put yourself in another person's shoes. And those shoes are of one that was FORCED into the oral only situation. That is what MANY of them here are fighting against. And if you really thought about it, you would see they were right. You were lucky in someways Cloggy, your daughter Lotte WAS and IS a successful implantee. But what if she wasnt, regardless of how much you tried to help her.

Im not saying ALL of Lotte's success was luck. But lets face it, it was lucky it did work so well for her. Not as many kids are that lucky.

Cloggy, I can see you are one parent that is very proud of his kids, and I can also see that if Lotte had not been so successful, that you would have been the kind of parent that would have stopped at nothing to make sure Lotte was in the best enviroment she could be in. I can really see the love you have for Lotte. You do deserve to be commended for the devotion that you show towards your kids.

I just feel that it wouldn't hurt for you to advocate the signs as well. Just as you did for your Lotte. Maybe Im wrong but I dont really SEE you advocate for it too much in your posts. Its really wonderful that you were learning sign for Lotte and that you were teaching Lotte to sign and speak.

If only ALL new parents of deaf children did that much for them, Cloggy. Then maybe people like Shel won't have to deal with the heartbreak of seeing those that didn't do so well struggle to catch up.

Lotte would never have had that problem because YOU gave her every tool she needed to survive no matter what the outcome could have been. Sadly, not as many other parents do-do what you did for Lotte.

And THAT is what the major struggle over implants are. And sadly too many parents do believe that an implant is gonna be a miracle, and then when it doesnt work, they either dont wanna admit failure,defeat or there is somethingm wrong. And when that happens its the kids that lose.

I do understand the heartbreak Shel and others face when they deal with those types of parents.

Cloggy maybe it is hard for you to see that because you AREN'T that type of parent. You were the type that would have said, "OK, Lotte isn't doing so well with this implant, lets see what we can do for her now." You would have been the type to learn more signs and made signs an everyday enviroment for her. You would have looked around and found the best school for her. But sadly, not every parent is YOU Cloggy.

I direct this post at you Cloggy, because you do know the success that a parent could have with a CI child, and you do keep up with all the latest on how to help a CI child. So, with your voice advocating not only how to succeed, but also maybe you could also help advocate a little more *cant think how to say it*, of using ALL the tools available. You are the leading voice, and I do think you really care about doing well and about supporting new parents of deaf children, regardless of what decision they come to.
 
Thanks for those words - wise words.

Just a small reply,
Sign has been the first thing we used as soon as we knew Lotte was deaf. And I have always given a positive view on sign. Still do.
Sign was used when Lotte got her CI, because, communication is the most important in the relationship between the parent and the child.
Sign is still used, when needed, but that is not very often. Lotte herself does not use it any more. She will use her voice, even when she cannot hear and we use sign.
Sign might be used again, but by Lotte's choice. If she feels a need for it, and wants to use it to communicate we will support her in that. We have loved using signlanguage.

And I can see the suffering that happened due to the lack of communication with many of the people here. It is sad, and I would hate to see that happening to any child.

I know not all parents are not like me.
But do other people realise that...???
 
Last edited:
Thanks for those words - wise words.

Just a small reply,
Sign has been the first thing we used as soon as we knew Lotte was deaf. And I have always given a positive view on sign. Still do.
Sign was used when Lotte got her CI, because, communication is the most important in the relationship between the parent and the child.
Sign is still used, when needed, but that is not very often. Lotte herself does not use it any more. She will use her voice, even when she cannot hear and we use sign.
Sign might be used again, but by Lotte's choice. If she feels a need for it, and wants to use it to communicate we will support her in that. We have loved using signlanguage.

That's fair enough.

And I can see the suffering that happened due to the lack of communication with many of the people here. It is sad, and I would hate to see that happening to any child.

I know not all parents are not like me.
But do other people realise that...???

I want people to realize something here, it is two way street. we speak, they sign. I'll like to see the overcoming of communication barrier between the hearing and the deaf. I for one don't like to see hearing parents showing lack of interest in signing that's all I'm saying from the point on. :)
 
...
I want people to realize something here, it is two way street. we speak, they sign. I'll like to see the overcoming of communication barrier between the hearing and the deaf. I for one don't like to see hearing parents showing lack of interest in signing that's all I'm saying from the point on. :)
That's fair enough.
 
Thanks for those words - wise words.

Just a small reply,
Sign has been the first thing we used as soon as we knew Lotte was deaf. And I have always given a positive view on sign. Still do.

Ok, show me a video of YOURSELF in signin' to prove us that you still usin' signin'. I mean, REALLY sign language, not somethin' like you don't really want to when showin'. I want to see your signin' that is showin' encouragement.

Sign was used when Lotte got her CI, because, communication is the most important in the relationship between the parent and the child.

Yeah, right ! When you mentioned " when Lotte got her CI " it obviously to me that you are encouragin' her over CI rather than ASL/sign language. You are makin' it to " influence " her to keep up speak/hear rather than ASL/sign language.

Sign is still used, when needed, but that is not very often. Lotte herself does not use it any more. She will use her voice, even when she cannot hear and we use sign.

Know why ? Because, you don't keep encouragin' her to keep up signin'/ASL like you would encourage her to talk/hear. You use your voice most of the time to her rather than usin' your hands in signin'. I can tell which influence you are usin'.


Sign might be used again, but by Lotte's choice. If she feels a need for it, and wants to use it to communicate we will support her in that. We have loved using signlanguage.

Sign might be used again ? Are you sooo sure about that, Cloggy ? The way I see it between your lines, you are not encouragin' it. You just leave it out. You leave your hands in the closet and let your " voice " around to keep talkin'.



And I can see the suffering that happened due to the lack of communication with many of the people here. It is sad, and I would hate to see that happening to any child.

Yeah, right ! Is that what you see ? I don't think so, if we suffer due to the lack of communication. It has to do with our experiences and what our " views " tell us and what we " feel " about it ( of course, our hearts tell us if, it is right or not ).

I know not all parents are not like me.
But do other people realise that...???

Noo, not all parents are not like you, just because your case shows how selfishness it is. Teachers in school will give their students " D " / " F " grades, if they don't learn. High schools have their sign language classes. It doesn't mean it is only occassion or once in a while, if the students don't feel like it. They HAVE TO learn. That's what the school give the credits to them for. Without learn, they will NOT earn their credits to pass their grade.

I was right all along that you chose CI. Reason : just to get the easy way out - soo much easier for you. You don't really want to work on it effortlessly. Period.
 
I was right all along that you chose CI. Reason : just to get the easy way out - soo much easier for you. You don't really want to work on it effortlessly. Period.

You REALLY have no clue. You're just tossing judgments around. Its this kind of attitude that has made so many parents who come to this forum and look for insight, support, communication to leave. I just hope Cloggy doesn't become one of them.
 
I want people to realize something here, it is two way street. we speak, they sign. I'll like to see the overcoming of communication barrier between the hearing and the deaf. I for one don't like to see hearing parents showing lack of interest in signing that's all I'm saying from the point on. :)


That's exactly what I would like to see too, then I wouldn't have a problem with accepting the parents' decision on implanting their children...
 
You're just tossing judgments around. Its this kind of attitude that has made so many parents who come to this forum and look for insight, support, communication to leave. I just hope Cloggy doesn't become one of them.

Oh come on neecy this is a discussion forum, where people would agree to disagree, there's pro and cons, there's positives, negatives messages It can be a question or response, a comment, or an announcement.

If parents are looking for only positive responses, comments or questions maybe this forum isn't for them. Every one of us on this board had experienced negatives and judgments and yet I don't see you standing up and defending them, only those hearing parents... What gives?
 
Oh come on neecy this is a discussion forum, where people would agree to disagree, there's pro and cons, there's positives, negatives messages It can be a question or response, a comment, or an announcement.

Really?????
Then how come when I DISAGREE, i have different opinion, I am immediately accused of disrespecting?
Clearly, a difference in opinion is granted to SOME people only, not all of us.

Fuzzy
 
If parents are looking for only positive responses, comments or questions maybe this forum isn't for them. Every one of us on this board had experienced negatives and judgments and yet I don't see you standing up and defending them, only those hearing parents... What gives?

Parents are looking to have a deaf links with their hearing word for their children, but after seeying the amount of crap and narrow mindedness that is here, and thrown into their faces for implanting their kids,
they quickly withraw and congratulate themselves for keeping their child out of all this = deaf world.
That gives.

Fuzzy
 
You REALLY have no clue. You're just tossing judgments around. Its this kind of attitude that has made so many parents who come to this forum and look for insight, support, communication to leave. I just hope Cloggy doesn't become one of them.


Some people passed judgements on me for declawing my cats and sadly I'm still here, I guess I'm nuts....
 
Parents are looking to have a deaf links with their hearing word for their children, but after seeying the amount of crap and narrow mindedness that is here, and thrown into their faces for implanting their kids,
they quickly withraw and congratulate themselves for keeping their child out of all this = deaf world.
That gives.

Fuzzy

Cheri, Jillo, Liebling, Angel, and a few of us do not represent the whole deaf community. It would be like looking at some a few people of that community and swearing off a whole community based on a few people's strong opinions.

We are concerned about the deaf children's language development and being able to have higher literacy skills and not have this problem of many older deaf kids being referring to the Deaf schools and finally learning ASL due to not being able to keep up in an oral-only environment.

Deaf world hasnt been mentioned as much as language access.
 
Really?????
Then how come when I DISAGREE, i have different opinion, I am immediately accused of disrespecting?
Clearly, a difference in opinion is granted to SOME people only, not all of us.

Fuzzy

You weren't just disagreeing you were being disrespectful, telling me how to post, what to post. I don't need anyone telling me what I should write and what I shouldn't write. Understand each others? End of the discussion, let's move on. I'm tired of arguing about this with you.
 
and being able to have higher literacy skills

I have excellent literacy skills even if my parents didn't sign, and I didn't hear well.

Higher literacy skills hardly depends on parent's ability to sign- it depends on their general attitude toward education per se.
If to a parent an education, literary skills, matters - then it reflects on their children.

The majority of the deaf parents I knew were themselves hardly educated. They had poor literacy skills, and weren't involved in their children education either.
I remember an instance when a hearing child asked his deaf parent for healp with basic math. the parent didn't learn math himself either so he just shrugged: "I dunno math, I can't help, sorry". he didn't organized any help from other sources either (tutoring, after classes homework club etc). So the child eventually failed math. same with English: "I dunno, I'm sorry you have to it yourself.."

When I pointed out to one such parent that their child is falling behind in early elementary grade, their response was "she is just not interested in this". Whewn I pointed out the child needs and education to get ahead in life they just shrugged "what will be will be..".
No concern, no worry, no parent involvement.

The same applies to uneducated hearing parents to whom education is not important. They do nothing to help their children, deaf or hearing, to succed in school. No matter how well they will sign, it won't help their kids to achieve good literary skills.



Fuzzy
 
You weren't just disagreeing you were being disrespectful, telling me how to post, what to post. I don't need anyone telling me what I should write and what I shouldn't write. Understand each others?

I understand YOU perfectly well. And I disagree.
The main question is: DO YOU understand ME?
I don't believe so.
Like Cloggy pointed out - if you are wrong, then you are wrong, and no matter if that it's "your opinion" - your opinion is then wrong. It's still yours, byt also wrong. get it?

Pointing out that someone's opinion is incorrect is NOT disrespectful.

Fuzzy
 
I understand YOU perfectly well. And I disagree.
The main question is: DO YOU understand ME?
I don't believe so.
Like Cloggy pointed out - if you are wrong, then you are wrong, and no matter if that it's "your opinion" - your opinion is then wrong. It's still yours, byt also wrong. get it?

Pointing out that someone's opinion is incorrect is NOT disrespectful.

Fuzzy

I provided a link and backed up everything I said from the get and go. You were the only one who had a problem with my opinion, well too bad.

Let's not have this thread locked once again by you. so move on and drop it. :ty:
 
I provided a link and backed up everything I said from the get and go. You were the only one who had a problem with my opinion, well too bad.

So? I thought you said it's OKAY to have different opinion? I happen to have different than you. How's that disrecpectful, and then - since yours is different than MINE, how come I am disrespectful yet you are not?
You don't agree with ME..:ugh2:

besides - I view your link differently than you. to me it doesn't prove what it proves to you.

Fuzzy
 
Cheri, Jillo, Liebling, Angel, and a few of us do not represent the whole deaf community. It would be like looking at some a few people of that community and swearing off a whole community based on a few people's strong opinions.

We are concerned about the deaf children's language development and being able to have higher literacy skills and not have this problem of many older deaf kids being referring to the Deaf schools and finally learning ASL due to not being able to keep up in an oral-only environment.

Deaf world hasnt been mentioned as much as language access.


Exactly!! Thank you Shel90
 
Umm...let's keep this in mind shall we? :whistle:
Roadrunner said:
Mod Note:


Thread's back up...giving it another chance. Happens again--it'll stay locked up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top