Jimmy Carter blasts George W. on his global impact

Status
Not open for further replies.

ITPjohn

SAC Class of 05
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
847
Reaction score
0
Carter blasts Bush on his global impact - Yahoo! News

Carter blasts Bush on his global impact
Sat May 19, 7:08 PM ET

Former President Carter says President Bush's administration is "the worst in history" in international relations, taking aim at the White House's policy of pre-emptive war and its Middle East diplomacy.

The criticism from Carter, which a biographer says is unprecedented for the 39th president, also took aim at Bush's environmental policies and the administration's "quite disturbing" faith-based initiative funding.

"I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history," Carter told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in a story that appeared in the newspaper's Saturday editions. "The overt reversal of America's basic values as expressed by previous administrations, including those of George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon and others, has been the most disturbing to me."

Carter spokeswoman Deanna Congileo confirmed his comments to The Associated Press on Saturday and declined to elaborate. He spoke while promoting his new audiobook series, "Sunday Mornings in Plains," a collection of weekly Bible lessons from his hometown of Plains, Ga.

"Apparently, Sunday mornings in Plains for former President Carter includes hurling reckless accusations at your fellow man," said Amber Wilkerson, Republican National Committee spokeswoman. She said it was hard to take Carter seriously because he also "challenged Ronald Reagan's strategy for the Cold War."

Carter came down hard on the Iraq war.

"We now have endorsed the concept of pre-emptive war where we go to war with another nation militarily, even though our own security is not directly threatened, if we want to change the regime there or if we fear that some time in the future our security might be endangered," he said. "But that's been a radical departure from all previous administration policies."

Carter, who won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, criticized Bush for having "zero peace talks" in Israel. Carter also said the administration "abandoned or directly refuted" every negotiated nuclear arms agreement, as well as environmental efforts by other presidents.

Carter also offered a harsh assessment for the White House's Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, which helped religious charities receive $2.15 billion in federal grants in fiscal year 2005 alone.

"The policy from the White House has been to allocate funds to religious institutions, even those that channel those funds exclusively to their own particular group of believers in a particular religion," Carter said. "As a traditional Baptist, I've always believed in separation of church and state and honored that premise when I was president, and so have all other presidents, I might say, except this one."

Douglas Brinkley, a Tulane University presidential historian and Carter biographer, described Carter's comments as unprecedented.

"This is the most forceful denunciation President Carter has ever made about an American president," Brinkley said. "When you call somebody the worst president, that's volatile. Those are fighting words."

Carter also lashed out Saturday at British prime minister Tony Blair. Asked how he would judge Blair's support of Bush, the former president said: "Abominable. Loyal. Blind. Apparently subservient."

"And I think the almost undeviating support by Great Britain for the ill-advised policies of President Bush in Iraq have been a major tragedy for the world," Carter told British Broadcasting Corp. radio.

Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
 
White House hits back at Carter remarks

Here's W's rebuttal. The White House calling Carter's remarks 'irrelevant' isn't suprising considering what they've said about other critics. Which one does the majority of Americans agree with?

White House hits back at Carter remarks - Yahoo! News

White House hits back at Carter remarks
By BEN FELLER, Associated Press Writer
Sun May 20, 3:31 PM ET

In a biting rebuke, the White House on Sunday dismissed former President Jimmy Carter as "increasingly irrelevant" after his harsh criticism of President Bush.

Carter was quoted Saturday as saying "I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history."

The Georgia Democrat said Bush had overseen an "overt reversal of America's basic values" as expressed by previous administrations, including that of his own farther, former President George H.W. Bush.

"I think it's sad that President Carter's reckless personal criticism is out there," White House spokesman Tony Fratto responded Sunday from Crawford, where Bush spent the weekend.

"I think it's unfortunate," Fratto said. "And I think he is proving to be increasingly irrelevant with these kinds of comments."

Carter made the comments to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in a story that appeared in the newspaper's Saturday editions.

Carter spokeswoman Deanna Congileo confirmed his comments to The Associated Press on Saturday and declined to elaborate.

Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
 
Jimmy Carter criticizing another President's administration--that's rich! :rofl:
 
That's classic:giggle:
 
Yeah, I gotta say, Carter had a TERRIBLE administration--with his only bright spot being a deal between Israel and Egypt (that really was more Sadat being willing than anything, and I think most Presidents could have done it). Carter is looking pathetic.

I have a lot of problems with Bush, but many in the areas of competence, not goals. Carter's goals are just wrong.
 
Yeah, I gotta say, Carter had a TERRIBLE administration--with his only bright spot being a deal between Israel and Egypt (that really was more Sadat being willing than anything, and I think most Presidents could have done it). Carter is looking pathetic.

I have a lot of problems with Bush, but many in the areas of competence, not goals. Carter's goals are just wrong.

during his term, gas cost was that so high.... twice Sure sure.. blame on him or not.
 
during his term, gas cost was that so high.... twice Sure sure.. blame on him or not.

Well, I'm not sure we can directly blame him for that, but he did have terrible economic policy. Reagan had his flaws, but he saved this country's economy by lowering tax rates. (Under Reagan, the gov't brought in MORE money on lower RATES, because people made more so it was taxed more.)
 
during his term, gas cost was that so high.... twice Sure sure.. blame on him or not.

Yup, that where's 1979 Iran Revolution.

Alot of Iranians (mostly Jewish) were moved to USA during late 70's and 80's.
 
Carter and Bush(young one) is both are worst top five Presidents .
 
Did you all realize that President Bush has a learning disability????
 
I'm not surprised... Bush IS the worse in history!
 
Did you all realize that President Bush has a learning disability????

You're shitting me, right? Not that it's implaussible to believe... but... don't they usually weed out people who are mentally incomptent before giving them the reins to rule over a country...? It's like giving a chimpanzee a revolver... in this case literally.
 
Bush isn't unintelligent (though he obviously has some speaking problems more than other politicians) but people like to paint political foes as being unintelligent. Reagan, Ford, Eisenhower, all were said to be stupid or simple. Hardly the truth. Bush's problems have been many, and I don't think he has been a good president on a lot of issues, but I don't think he's not-smart (I don't think you get to the level of success he has without intelligence) and I don't think he's an evil person. I just think he's WRONG on a lot of things.
 
Everything is relative. President's inherit a spot in history. Inherit roblems. Some have more power to do things via a same party senate and house etc. some have more monies due to inherited economies.
I'm not a Bush fan. I support the war. I don't like his shove religion down the courties throat. Him and DINK Cheney think they know whats best for everyone. That ain't a democracy.
One of Bush's biggest faults is his loyalty to a fault idiocy. That's how you run a business in Texas maybe but the country deserves the best and deserves continuity of confidence.
The Katrina fiasco.........Brown lousy and yet.......... this has been Bush's trademark and I think he let people shove foriegn policy down his throat without a clue. We should have been more prepared. Cheney was defense minister under Bush one. Bush is Cheney's lapdog yes man. Idiot.
 
You're shitting me, right? Not that it's implaussible to believe... but... don't they usually weed out people who are mentally incomptent before giving them the reins to rule over a country...? It's like giving a chimpanzee a revolver... in this case literally.

There is alot people with learning disablitiy have high IQ but with Bush he is not one of them. I already knew he has ld and he is no different from my son. I do not see anything wrong with anyone with LD to be a president of our country.
 
PResident Bush has problem with his losing temper himself and can't accept the truth who he is facing his problem!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top