For adults who were BORN deaf & transitioned from HA to CI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hardly.
then again you come across as someone who thinks us Deaf are dumb too..
Anyway
Im not the kind to let a dictionary dictate to me if im normal or not. clearly you are,
So that their is no misunderstanding ill be clear.
deaf are normal human biengs. We lead full meaningfull lives, we have a gift that we are Deaf, and many of us hold sympathy for the signed impaired. we are NORMAL, to be DEAF is normal,

You missed the humor in this. Remember you were the one quoting dictionary definitions to justify sign is technology. You got caught with your own arguments.
I'll give you the definition of that word as used here. " In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements typically used to persuade someone of something or to present reasons for accepting a conclusion"

And please don't put words into my mouth. Speak for yourself and I will do the same. It seems you completely misunderstand my arguments and immediately post an emotional rebuttal.

You also seem to ignore requests for clarification when you make statements about others that you cannot backup. I refer you back to post #19 when you accused me of having a CI Ideology. Now you accuse me of thinking Deaf people are dumb. So that must mean I think I am dumb as is the mother of MY children and many of my friends. There are a lot of stupid people on this world but whether or not they can hear has nothing to do with it.

As for the term normal. You do realize that language had to have common meanings in order to communicate effectively. I would have advised the poster to use hearing people instead of normal. I don't like the term either, normal really means Same as the majority dominant culture and sociological norms in area. So really Deaf or HoH are different from the norm.
And if we looked close we cold probably pick apart the "normal" group....

One example is the normal society thinks BDSM is perverted and wrong, yet 50 Shades of Grey sold over 40 million copies. Many must obviously have hidden interest or fetish for BDSM. So they cannot be part of that normal group.

We can find many examples where people differ from what they claim is the norm. To the point one could argue that "normal" does not actually exist.
 
[

You missed the humor in this. Remember you were the one quoting dictionary definitions to justify sign is technology. You got caught with your own arguments. xist.
No i didnt get caught with anything. Me using wiki as a means to explain my use of the word technology in framing sign is a different beast entirely then using a dictionary to class and pidgeonhole human biengs

And please don't put words into my mouth. Speak for yourself and I will do the same. It seems you completely misunderstand my arguments and immediately post an emotional rebuttal. .
Maybe i misunderstood, feel free to better explain your position.

You also seem to ignore requests for clarification when you make statements about others that you cannot backup.al. I refer you back to post #19 when you accused me of having a CI Ideology. al. .
I can back it up, i just refuse to de rail a thread to do iT. Start a thread for it. And ill be more then happy to chime in.

Now you accuse me of thinking Deaf people are dumb. So that must mean I think I am dumb as is the mother of MY children and many of my friends. There are a lot of stupid people on this world but whether or not they can hear has nothing to do with it. xist.

It wasnt an aqusation, it was a retorical question to illustrate a point.


As for the term normal. You do realize that language had to have common meanings in order to communicate effectively. I would have advised the poster to use hearing people instead of normal. I don't like the term either, normal really means Same as the majority dominant culture and sociological norms in area. So really Deaf or HoH are different from the norm.
And if we looked close we cold probably pick apart the "normal" group....

One example is the normal society thinks BDSM is perverted and wrong, yet 50 Shades of Grey sold over 40 million copies. Many must obviously have hidden interest or fetish for BDSM. So they cannot be part of that normal group.

We can find many examples where people differ from what they claim is the norm. To the point one could argue that "normal" does not actually exist.
It only exists in the minds of those who wish to lebel human beings as something other, in order to cage them via dominate culture, and create . World where by some measure of normalcy those deemed abnormal can be assimlated
 
Hochi. You derailed the thread by making the statement in the first place and refuse to explain a term you used in the read when asked. It's not a rhetorical question you clearly staying how you feel I view Deaf people as a group. Again. Choose your words better. If you think it distracts from the thread then you should make a new one to explain why you repeatedly accuse people of things or beliefs that are unsubstantiated...

And using wiki to define a term is the same regardless of what that term is...
 
Hochi. You derailed the thread by making the statement in the first place and refuse to explain a term you used in the read when asked. It's not a rhetorical question you clearly staying how you feel I view Deaf people as a group. Again. Choose your words better. If you think it distracts from the thread then you should make a new one to explain why you repeatedly accuse people of things or beliefs that are unsubstantiated...

And using wiki to define a term is the same regardless of what that term is...
If your on about me stating your adherence to ci ideology, i sure did,and d thats the inpression your posts have left me scross multiple threads.
If you are talking about normal it was tomer who first used the term In this thread.
As for my retorical question, thats exacfly what it was, you can internalize it anyway you like. No plm with me
 
If you are talking about normal it was tomer who first used the term In this thread.
As for my retorical question, thats exacfly what it was, you can internalize it anyway you like. No plm with me
It was a statement by you ask it's not a question of any type. Re-read what you wrote. Again you cherry picked and avoided answering questions you cannot back up. You make accusations and won't stand behind them.
Now I don't accuse you of being dumb at all. I suspect you of maybe being closed minded and unwilling or unable to view any issue from other than your own egocentric perspective of it. As such when another perspective is given, instead of getting to understand it you cast labels on everyone who has a different perspective than you.
Furthermore if you cannot understand and appreciate the perspective of another, there is little hope of convincing them to do the same if yours.

Lastly you make wild assumptions about me and other people that are not backed up by any statements they make.

From your responses to my posts thus far, you seem to be completely wrong about my stance on every issue. I do not need to waste my time explaining my beliefs to you. But when you accuse me of things that are untrue, accusatory, offensive then I will respond...
 
[

It was a statement by you ask it's not a question of any type. Re-read what you wrote. d...
Indeed it was a statement, but it can also be read as a question, regardless i stand by it. Its how you come across to me, considering your fine with pegging people as not normal, i was only connecting rhe dots.

It w Again you cherry picked and avoided answering questions you cannot back up. You make accusations and won't stand behind them.d...
I CAN Back them up, i choose not to derail this thread to do it.

It

Now I don't accuse you of being dumb at all. I suspect you of maybe being closed minded and unwilling or unable to view any issue from other than your own egocentric perspective of it. As such when another perspective is given, instead of getting to understand it you cast labels on everyone who has a different perspective than you.
Furthermore if you cannot understand and appreciate the perspective of another, there is little hope of convincing them to do the same if yours. d...
Look whos talking

Lastly you make wild assumptions about me and other people that are not backed up by any statements they make. d...
My assumptions are not wild in the least. Its the inpression your posts have given me.
From your responses to my posts thus far, you seem to be completely wrong about my stance on every issue. I do not need to waste my time explaining my beliefs to you. But when you accuse me of things that are untrue, accusatory, offensive then I will respond...
Cool....
 
[


Indeed it was a statement, but it can also be read as a question, regardless i stand by it. Its how you come across to me, considering your fine with pegging people as not normal, i was only connecting rhe dots.


I CAN Back them up, i choose not to derail this thread to do it.


Look whos talking


My assumptions are not wild in the least. Its the inpression your posts have given me.

Cool....
Please show me with my statements how I have given you the impression of what you refuse to explain CI ideology and the Deaf people are dumb?
 
Please show me with my statements how I have given you the impression of what you refuse to explain CI ideology and the Deaf people are dumb?

This thread isnt about you,
start one for this, and ill chime in...°¬)
 
This thread isnt about you,
start one for this, and ill chime in...°¬)
Look who is talking! Don't make it about me then. Stick to the issues instead of labeling people. Nice way to avoid addressing the real issues BTW. You still failed to explain basic terminology you USED in this thread. BTW the OP didn't ask to know anyone's ideology they were asking about listening experiences with CI that I did address on topic and that YOU DID NOT!
I'M SURE THE OP Appreciates you hijacking yet another thread.
 
Look who is talking! Don't make it about me then. Stick to the issues instead of labeling people. Nice wai y to avoid addressing the real issues BTW. You still failed to explain basic terminology you USED in this thread. BTW the OP didn't ask to know anyone's ideology they were asking about listening experiences with CI that I did address on topic and that YOU DID NOT!
I'M SURE THE OP Appreciates you hijacking yet another thread.

I didnt hijack anything. my posts in this thread stand for all to see.
What i did was point out deafdykes sarcasm which you failed to grasp, which isnt suprising, then i toom exception to the use of normal in tomers post..so on
Now
my posts will stand for themselves...
If you dont like it....tough
 
Way to hijack my thread guys and quintessentially just 'bicker'. Hmmmmmmm
 
Have you checked to see if there is a later processor that you can switch to for use with your implant?

Also, I keep reading about the importance of doing rehab to train your brain to get the most out of your implant.

I am at the end of the line with the latest model available for my magnet. I got my Ci way back in early 90s.

Plenty rehab. Sounds are all same.
 
I am at the end of the line with the latest model available for my magnet. I got my Ci way back in early 90s.

Plenty rehab. Sounds are all same.
Kai, what brand and model of implant and processor do you have? What options are available to you for upgrades now, would it require surgery to update the implant itself? I do see this as one of the biggest risks or drawbacks to CI itself.
 
Last edited:
Kai, what brand and model of implant and processor do you have? What options are available to you for ioSafe now, would it require surgery to update the implant itself? I do see this as one of the biggest risks or drawbacks to CI itself.

N22 and the freedom.

Insurance will not consider an upgrade since I already have a functioning working processor. I even at one point said I wanted the magnet out of my head and they said it was consisered opitional. Even with the mysterious migraines ill only get in the CI area of my head.

I do not ever want to ruin my other ear as im always holding hope they can make the decfective inside ear mend itself again.

Thats how CI works. Attend to the latest newest magnet people first and forget about everyone else down the line
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top