Declaration of Occupy Wall Street

Status
Not open for further replies.
Awww......... yet no one forced you to read them. Just...look away! Resist the temptation to loooook! And you'd be less inclined whine about posters. Me? I just shrug. Meanwhile, I'll continue to contribute my share.

Thanks for the warning. :wave:
 
Awww......... yet no one forced you to read them. Just...look away! Resist the temptation to loooook! And you'd be less inclined whine about posters. Me? I just shrug. Meanwhile, I'll continue to contribute my share.

But they are good for such a laugh.:laugh2:
 
And I am talking about how everyone that has a video posted claims it clearly shows what they want it to, but the opposing group (Left or Right) seem to find it is fuzzy, shaky, unclear; you name it. Can you say eye of the beholder? You are on the biased end of things, so half of the videos are blurred, and half are crystal clear.

As far as I can recollect, I've seen only one video that was shaky, blurry at times with out of focused video shots zooming in and out interspersed with some clear shots amid a bunch of people jostling around.
:dunno:
 
As far as I can recollect, I've seen only one video that was shaky, blurry at times with out of focused video shots zooming in and out interspersed with some clear shots amid a bunch of people jostling around.
:dunno:

I did not single you out. When I posted my original comment about video quality, there was nobody quoted or replied to. It was a general comment. You standing up for the Liberals as well?

Anyhow, I shall continue to contribute as well. Here goes...:fruit::dance::dance2::rockon::fart:
 
:nana:

You probably should worry more about the disrespect you show in your posts to any number of people in any number of capacities.

Meh, I support our men in blue. They have a tough job and desrve respect.
 
So far the Movement has cost NYC $17 million in police overtime and other costs, while it is a measly $2,200 in St. Louis. What a hick town. :lol:
 
I did not single you out. When I posted my original comment about video quality, there was nobody quoted or replied to. It was a general comment. You standing up for the Liberals as well?

Anyhow, I shall continue to contribute as well. Here goes...:fruit::dance::dance2::rockon::fart:

That depends.....
 
Meh, I support our men in blue. They have a tough job and desrve respect.

Flip flop flip flop.

When we actually have a "man in blue" around here, the attitude of many would be different, lol.
 
Really? You want to know if taking away the fundamental principle in our entire legal system is a problem? Really? :lol: I've got no response to that. :wave:
Blatant strawman. I'm not talking about habeas corpus and I never asked if taking it away is a problem. I asked if the Patriot Act had been used against anyone merely for making political statements against the president. You still haven't answered that question.

Prosecute would be taking someone to trial. Persecute would be to subject someone to hostility. Almost interchangeable when used the way it was.
I meant persecute. Putting someone under surveillance and investigating them for treason because of political comments is persecution, but not prosecution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top