Suing former employer for violating ADA? - Page 2

Jiro · 08-25-2008, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardDeaf

Mortal of the story, if employee think you are valuable employee, keep fighting what you believe you need to do your job.

yup! keep your head up and GRIN!

webexplorer · 08-25-2008, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imdeafsowhat

I am in a process of suing a video game company. They fired me for spelling and grammar errors. But it was just this word "paitence" and they also considered the grammar with spelling errors is also a error. When I applied to make a case against the company, the district said it will take a year. So it took a year and I got a letter with details of my mistakes. I have to admit I did make mistakes, but who didn't on their first few days and during training. Also I wasn't given any accomodations because a team leader was keeping me updated with everything, for example, an upcoming meeting, he would provide me information of what's going on in the meetings and what questions manager will ask, also what should I say when it's my turn to speak. I thought everything was going great, but I was mistaken, they didn't want me and I felt discriminated. Was I right to apply the charges against them? I am only doing it so it won't happen to others like us because there isn't ONE disabled employee in that company of more than thirty employees. Anyways, I responded to that letter with a strong confident information describing my mistakes and what I learnt from the mistakes. I also described that I am a student pursuiting a career in designing video game. Sucks, I waited for a year for a simple letter and now I'm waiting on the letter I sent.

Job Position: Customer Service Representative for Massive Multi Player Online Role Playing Games.

Task: answering 300+ emails a day

Excuse me, are you British? It's because you spelled, "learnt" on your post. This word is often from German.

zerodog · 08-26-2008, 06:47 PM

I have read several of your posts about the ADA. However; I understand about terminated but one thing you can sued them for terminated.

For example; if they have told you about spelling or error that need be correction issue. If thing doesn't improve, they may have let you go.

For wrong example; if they realized that communication issue doesn't work effective due their "waste" time. Once they hope to find mistake and they just blow to fired you! Yes, sued them due because they think person have great strong field of employee history but blow in hot potato. Course, it will hard to believe to reaction and say 'damn you'.

Right now about the CART thing or whatever that communication effect that NAD is working on that part for communication to access. Again, I read that website that recent change the ADA law effect in June 2008. It explain so clear what it should be and which I support that idea instead of summary with cloud explain to limited disablity to expand define of ADA. For example; they don't support idea of doctor appointment without interpreter due lot of failure communication.

FOR EXAMPLE and it happen to me... I have back issue, I went on travel somehow that pain jolt my back wasn't funny. I happen went to ER. The ER doctor was stare at me and my wife... we were confused... ER doctor went to upper doctor field and come to me. Asked "Why are you taking this pill? Do you know what for?" I response, it for pain refiel, doctor say no.. it for treatment for who have STD

Many thing has start change process of ADA which I support however... about that quit part, move on... FIRED thing is BIG Issue because of our limited that felt waste time but know as a good employee that can help but but felt waste time to hassle deal with mute or can't hear... want team who can hear or speak faster than just have hassle... that pretty wrongful..

Hey... look at the bright side, hearing is disablity because they don't know how to sign.. what for, we have interpreter.

imdeafsowhat · 08-27-2008, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

you have no case. that's what we're trying to tell you. if the company's not responding to you to settle or discuss to make amend, that's because you have no case!

Jerk.

You assumed.
(Making an ass out of yourself and Mini-me.)

I only talk about it cause I am making a case against my former employer. Now it is in process to send to the district of EEOC, Equal Employment Opportunity Comission, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This might help others who had hard time trying to make a case.

Please acknowledge this, to make a case, you need to have strong points and strong opinions, then you can develop a case, it doesn't matter if it's small or big, you have the rights to take those to trial.

imdeafsowhat · 08-27-2008, 11:52 AM

well said, zero dog.

Yes, ADA is still improving nowadays, but people aren't compelling to the laws at all times.

Yes, I was terminated, that means I WAS FIRED for reasons that can be improved in the company. Did you see how I explained when I admitted my mistakes? I said I did make mistakes, but I improved and changed. I even assisted the team to look better, there's no I in teamwork!

Learnt is often used by those who mastered english for it is unique. But you're right, I'm a race of German and French.

08-26-2008, 06:47 PM	#33 (permalink)
zerodog My nose is light! Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Oh Thanks Heaven! Posts: 507	I have read several of your posts about the ADA. However; I understand about terminated but one thing you can sued them for terminated. For example; if they have told you about spelling or error that need be correction issue. If thing doesn't improve, they may have let you go. For wrong example; if they realized that communication issue doesn't work effective due their "waste" time. Once they hope to find mistake and they just blow to fired you! Yes, sued them due because they think person have great strong field of employee history but blow in hot potato. Course, it will hard to believe to reaction and say 'damn you'. Right now about the CART thing or whatever that communication effect that NAD is working on that part for communication to access. Again, I read that website that recent change the ADA law effect in June 2008. It explain so clear what it should be and which I support that idea instead of summary with cloud explain to limited disablity to expand define of ADA. For example; they don't support idea of doctor appointment without interpreter due lot of failure communication. FOR EXAMPLE and it happen to me... I have back issue, I went on travel somehow that pain jolt my back wasn't funny. I happen went to ER. The ER doctor was stare at me and my wife... we were confused... ER doctor went to upper doctor field and come to me. Asked "Why are you taking this pill? Do you know what for?" I response, it for pain refiel, doctor say no.. it for treatment for who have STD Many thing has start change process of ADA which I support however... about that quit part, move on... FIRED thing is BIG Issue because of our limited that felt waste time but know as a good employee that can help but but felt waste time to hassle deal with mute or can't hear... want team who can hear or speak faster than just have hassle... that pretty wrongful.. Hey... look at the bright side, hearing is disablity because they don't know how to sign.. what for, we have interpreter. __________________ Life is giving to us, we earn it by giving it. Let the dead have the immortality of fame, but the living the immortality of love - mean next child earn the life from me, because I love my child that mean lot to me will give to next little person earn the immortality of love from families.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

08-27-2008, 11:52 AM	#35 (permalink)
imdeafsowhat Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: The Golden Coast Posts: 1,983	well said, zero dog. Yes, ADA is still improving nowadays, but people aren't compelling to the laws at all times. Yes, I was terminated, that means I WAS FIRED for reasons that can be improved in the company. Did you see how I explained when I admitted my mistakes? I said I did make mistakes, but I improved and changed. I even assisted the team to look better, there's no I in teamwork! Learnt is often used by those who mastered english for it is unique. But you're right, I'm a race of German and French.