Deaf Education - One size does not fit all

Please and thank Qs

jillio said:
In that case, I suggest you refrain from attempting to limit the responses you receive to your questions.
Click to expand...

I am not seeking to limit the responses jillio. I was under the impression that it was rude to answer a question posed to someone else.
 
loml said:
I am not seeking to limit the responses jillio. I was under the impression that it was rude to answer a question posed to someone else.
Click to expand...

On a public forum, it is not. And we are engaged in a discussion of educational methodology, not social etiquette.

Perhaps you would care to answer the question posed in post # 498. Or are you purposely avoiding it?
 
multiple choice, essay, true or false, truth or dare.....

jillio said:
On a public forum, it is not. And we are engaged in a discussion of educational methodology, not social etiquette.

Perhaps you would care to answer the question posed in post # 498. Or are you purposely avoiding it?
Click to expand...

Is this a test jillio?
 
The haves and the have nots.......

jillio said:
On a public forum, it is not. And we are engaged in a discussion of educational methodology, not social etiquette.

Perhaps you would care to answer the question posed in post # 498. Or are you purposely avoiding it?
Click to expand...

jillio - Guess that is one of the many differences between you and me, social etiquette.
 
jillio - Ideally the child would have aquire/learn both, determining which would be first would be somewhat difficult. English first, ASL, the child needs to be part of their family. How each individual family accomplishes this, up to them. They have to make informed decisions.

Even if the deaf child learns the familial language first, why do you have such issue with this?
Click to expand...

jillio - Thought perhaps you might has missed this question.
 
loml said:
jillio - Guess that is one of the many differences between you and me, social etiquette.
Click to expand...

I agree. You don't seem to be able to understand when the deaf members of this board have expressed their exasperation with your constant barrage of posts on the wonders of CS.
 
loml said:
jillio - Thought perhaps you might has missed this question.
Click to expand...

Nope, didn't miss it. In fact, I have answered it numerous times, in numerous posts. Did you by chance, miss the answers?
 
Keep running with it........

jillio said:
I agree. You don't seem to be able to understand when the deaf members of this board have expressed their exasperation with your constant barrage of posts on the wonders of CS.
Click to expand...

jillio - Choices jillio, choices.
 
jillio said:
Nope, didn't miss it. In fact, I have answered it numerous times, in numerous posts. Did you by chance, miss the answers?
Click to expand...


Actually no you have not answered that exact question jillio.

jillio - Ideally the child would have aquire/learn both, determining which would be first would be somewhat difficult. English first, ASL, the child needs to be part of their family. How each individual family accomplishes this, up to them. They have to make informed decisions.

Even if the deaf child learns the familial language first, why do you have such issue with this?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
No corners here.....

jillio said:
Then it is perhaps the result of your having backed yourself into the proverbial corner.
Click to expand...

jillio - No quite wrong there. Taking a survey here then are you?

loml
Actually no you have not answered that exact question jillio.
Click to expand...

jillio
Then why request it again? I am not as fond of redundancy as you appear to be.
Click to expand...

jillio- Simply because you didn't answer it.
 
Last edited:
loml said:
jillio - No quite wrong there. Taking a survey here then are you?

loml


jillio


jillio- Simply because you didn't answer it.
Click to expand...

Again with your lack of understanding of research methodology. A survey is given to various members of a target population. I addressed my question specifically to you.

Then why, pray tell, did you state "Actually no you have answered that exact question jillio." Are you getting confused again, loml?

And quite simply, you are refusing to answer a very simple question. For some reason, you find that question threatening. Why would that be, loml?
 
jillio said:
Again with your lack of understanding of research methodology. A survey is given to various members of a target population. I addressed my question specifically to you.

Then why, pray tell, did you state "Actually no you have answered that exact question jillio." Are you getting confused again, loml?

And quite simply, you are refusing to answer a very simple question. For some reason, you find that question threatening. Why would that be, loml?
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with research methodology jillio. Threatening would not be my choice of word for your questions jillio.

My statement was this: Actually no you have not answered that exact question jillio.

Perhaps you did not have the opportunity to view the correction.
 
loml said:
This has nothing to do with research methodology jillio. Threatening would not be my choice of word for your questions jillio.
asking me if I was taking a survery most certainly has to do with research methodology. The fact that you fail to see that is indication of your lack of understanding. And, if you are not threatened by the question, why is it that you still refuse to answer?


My statement was this: Actually no you have not answered that exact question jillio.

And my reply is that I have. In numerous posts in numerous threads, as I stated previously.
Perhaps you did not have the opportunity to view the correction.
Click to expand...
The correction, quite obviously, was made after I pointed it out, as I copied and pasted from your post. Nice try. How about a little personal responsibility here, loml?

Yep, just as I suspected. You edited at 10:20...well after I posted your inconguencies. Nice attempt to backpedal, but it isn't working.
 
Big Brothers watching you..........

jillio said:
The correction, quite obviously, was made after I pointed it out, as I copied and pasted from your post. Nice try. How about a little personal responsibility here, loml?

Yep, just as I suspected. You edited at 10:20...well after I posted your inconguencies. Nice attempt to backpedal, but it isn't working.
Click to expand...

jillio - I corrected my typo. You going to answer the question?
 
loml said:
jillio - I corrected my typo. You going to answer the question?
Click to expand...

As I have already stated, loml, I have answered that question both in this thread and numerous others. I am not responsible for your obtuseness, or your difficulty in comprehension.

Are you going to answer the question I posed to you? You are still refusing to answer if, you are a supporter of ASL as you so claim, have you emailed responses to the A. G. Bell Assoc. or to Pepsico in support of their efforts? It is a question that requires only a simple yes or no answer. Very easy. Is it yes, or is it no? Further refusal to answer will indeed provide the answer that has been suspected all along.
 
Back
Top