Cochlear Implants - Reimplantation and Extrusion

Kalista

New Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
7,927
Reaction score
4
sometimes the implant has to be removed

It fortunately does not happen that often, but it does happen. Sometimes a newly implanted cochlear implant must be surgically removed. The implantee may get a new implant, or no new implant at all, depending on the reasons for the removal. One mother wrote to About and described what had happened to her child:

Child had to have cochlear removed because the incision would never heal properly.

The implant itself was a success and child was able to hear. Child and sibling both had the CI done. After 2 weeks [sibling] had healed perfectly and [child] had yet to heal completely. When the troubled area would finally heal [child] would have problems in another spot. They tried plastic surgery twice, attempting to close the wound. Both times were unsuccessful and the doctors could not figure out why it wouldn't heal. Finally, when the wound became so bad that about 1/3 of the CI was actually exposed the only option we had was to have it removed. In the 13 months that [child] had the implant she had only been able to use it about 5 months. I do not regret having the surgery done because the pros outweighed the cons by far. Unfortunately it didn't work as we had hoped.


Why Reimplant a Cochlear Implant?

There are several reasons that a cochlear implant may have to be removed. Among them:

  • The skin flap can become infected.
  • The body can reject the implant (as happened with the child above)
  • The implant receiver can extrude.
  • The electrode array can get damaged or the electrodes were not put in right. Or the electrode array can migrate out of place.
  • The implant simply does not work right.

How Frequent Is Reimplantation?

According to CochlearImplant.org (a website about insurance and cochlear implants), "approximately two percent of all cochlear implant devices experience device failure" and have to be removed (explanted). All device failures must be reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The FDA has a searchable online database, MAUDE, that lists cochlear implant device failures. A quick search on event type Malfunction turned up these results for reports submitted from 2001-2002 (by Dec. 31, 2002): Cochlear Nucleus 22: 249 records. Cochlear Nucleus 24: 227 records. Med-El Combi 40: 16 records. Advanced Bionics Clarion: 215 records.

Additional examples:

In a study of 10 implantees in Sweden, one had to have the implant removed due to infection.
In another study in Australia (Explantation and re-implantation in children and adults: the Melbourne experience, a presentation made at the 1999 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses), it was noted that "4 percent of total surgeries [were] performed due to device failure."
In web searching, I came across several examples of adults and children whose implants had to be removed because of infection or device failure. Most were able to do well with new implants.

Additional Resources

The issues of reimplantation and extrusion have been addressed in a variety of published resources:

A book, J. Thomas Roland Jr., "Complications of Cochlear Implant Surgery".
An article, Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional results, in Laryngoscope, vol 111, pp 1608-1613.
An article, " Outcome analysis of cochlear implant reimplantation in children, " in Laryngoscope, vol 111, pp. 26-32.
There is also a discussion list on problems with cochlear implants, ProblemCI.

Have you experienced extrusion or needed reimplantation? Was reimplantation successful? Submit your story for addition to this article and read others' submissions below.

"My son recently was reimplanted after the implant was found to be failing. We found out his implant was failing inthe anniverary month of him being implanted 3 years. He was able to progress even though his implant was failing. He was reimplanted and the difference is night and day. Within three weeks he has regained anything he lost when he wasn't hooked up and even gaining. The surgery was actually easier on him than the first time. He is so excited about having his implant back, functional."

----

"I'm a congenitally deaf woman who received a cochlear implant six years ago. Although my CI was functioning fine, the receiver had extruded and migrated so that it was pressing uncomfortably against my earlobe. Two months ago, I had surgery to reposition this CI. Unfortunately, the electrode array slipped out of the cochlea into the middle ear during surgery. Also, it is quite possible that the device also failed. When I first turned on my speech processor after the incision had healed, I received painful electrical shocks instead of hearing sounds. I'm scheduled for another surgery to replace my CI with the latest CI model.

I sure hope that this new CI will be successful because I would be really upset about going through the agony of another surgery and facing the disappointment of yet another CI failure."

"My friend informed me that she cannot have her CI removed because it is 10 years old and too dangerous of a medical operation (to have an implant removed). Does this mean she must live with the older CI technology?

What about young adults whose parents made the decision to this technology implanted, were the parties informed that removing an implant 10 years later would be dangerous and not recommended by the medical profession? How many thousands of children are trapped living with older generation technology in thier heads that is extremely dangerous to remove due to nerve growth around the implant? My friend was very saddened when she learned that at her present age, her doctor's were strongly against replacing her older CI with a newer CI due to the high probability of threat to her health and well being.

http://deafness.about.com/cs/cochlearfeatures/a/reimplantation.htm
 
That's one reason why I don't really favor the idea of cochlear implants. If there's a problem, they gotta fuck around with your head some more just to fix it. I'd rather have a simple hearing aid that I can simply go out and have replaced without anyone fucking around with my head.
 
VamPyroX said:
That's one reason why I don't really favor the idea of cochlear implants. If there's a problem, they gotta fuck around with your head some more just to fix it. I'd rather have a simple hearing aid that I can simply go out and have replaced without anyone fucking around with my head.

:werd: Vampy -- id say the VERY same thing too!!! i would prefer regular hearing aid without any doctors messing with my head which is a big :nono: for me!
 
illustrator said:
I wonder if stem cell would help remove tissue on our ear inner?
That's a possibility. However, research is difficult to be done due to Bush's opposion to cloning.
 
illustrator said:
Did Bush give them the limit fund?

Hell yeah limited stem cell research to the 21 or so existing genetic lines!

Now u just backed the wrong horse in the race! (figure that out ;) )

stem cell research is going to be the future not only just for Deafies (hair-cell growth) but the most important use for stem cell research is to treat Parkinson's Disease (the shaking of hands most common on Parkinson's-Michael J. Fox and Muhammad Ali both has Parkinsons and support stem cell research) , nerve growth for spinal cord injury and the one I want the most....a way to grow nerve connections for Spina Bifida since my kid has it and I support stem cell research but Bush is an IDIOT for limiting stem cell to the "21 Lines" that limits opportunity!
 
sablescort said:
Hell yeah limited stem cell research to the 21 or so existing genetic lines!

Now u just backed the wrong horse in the race! (figure that out ;) )

stem cell research is going to be the future not only just for Deafies (hair-cell growth) but the most important use for stem cell research is to treat Parkinson's Disease (the shaking of hands most common on Parkinson's-Michael J. Fox and Muhammad Ali both has Parkinsons and support stem cell research) , nerve growth for spinal cord injury and the one I want the most....a way to grow nerve connections for Spina Bifida since my kid has it and I support stem cell research but Bush is an IDIOT for limiting stem cell to the "21 Lines" that limits opportunity!

hair cell? Why do we, deaf need hair?

Anyway, I am saying I thought there could have artificial ear's main tools install in our ear inner.

Do we have proof on stem cell that help something on human begin? That's why Bush give limit until something is actual happen. Maybe will change mind.
 
Stem cell research will open our understanding of how our simplest cell the stem cell works. It is like DNA analysis but stem cell will provide the medicine community more insight of our body. The reason for Bush opposition I think is that stem cells come from aborted fetus and Bush is pro-Life. But shall we kill both to be pro-Life? He wants cheaper medicine but he is causing more expensive medicine. Good for Bush! We love high costs for little religious matters. :thumb:
 
I didn't know that cochlear implants would help deafies to hear up to 30 db. That is more of hard of hearing. Well I wonder if CIs can hear alot like sitting in the back of the classroom and being able to understand the teacher without looking at the teacher. I know HOHs can do that back when I was in high school. I dont think CI is good as hearing aids because hearing aids technology has been around longer. From what I read the NTID article, CI looks like ear being a socket and the doctor just plugs a couple of big wires into it. No thanks to CIs! :squint:
 
tekkmortal said:
Stem cell research will open our understanding of how our simplest cell the stem cell works. It is like DNA analysis but stem cell will provide the medicine community more insight of our body. The reason for Bush opposition I think is that stem cells come from aborted fetus and Bush is pro-Life. But shall we kill both to be pro-Life? He wants cheaper medicine but he is causing more expensive medicine. Good for Bush! We love high costs for little religious matters. :thumb:

LOL^ That's fucking funny. And true, btw.

Stem cells....what an issue...i mean, yeah, stem cells are from aborted fetuses, so that's the loss of a life. But can't ppl look at it as saving a life? Coz that's what it is...saving a life! Holy frig some ppl are just stuck in their ways...they want to be informed but if they don't agree with it to hell with the idea. :wtf:
 
WHY ALL THIS FEAR ABOUT C.I.s!!!

I lament the fear of our community to anything new!! OH WOE :tears:

We are living in a world where we fear DIFFERENCE and CHANGE - thats whats happening.

You have more chance of getting eaten by a shark or getting hit by a car than getting a bad C.I implant.

We're just cowards. :werd:
 
I think is that stem cells come from aborted fetus
Nope...they don't come from aborted fetuses...they come from the "leftovers" from IVF technology.
Personally I doubt that hair cell replacement will ever become a reality....how else will big business make money off of us? Medicene is HUGE business in this country, and hearing aid and CI manufactorers stand to gain absolutly NOTHING from this technology...whereas they make millions and billions off of hearing aids and CIs.
Yes, in the best case scenerio an implantee will have a "mild" loss....and actually if you hear at HOH levels with hearing aids (including word comprehension) you're not going to be eligable for the implant, unless you have trouble speaking on the phone or something. I know they've loosened the restrictions on who can get an implant....if you hear something like 60% and up with hearing aids, you're not going to be a canidate for implantation.
 
tekkmortal said:
I didn't know that cochlear implants would help deafies to hear up to 30 db. That is more of hard of hearing. Well I wonder if CIs can hear alot like sitting in the back of the classroom and being able to understand the teacher without looking at the teacher. I know HOHs can do that back when I was in high school. I dont think CI is good as hearing aids because hearing aids technology has been around longer. From what I read the NTID article, CI looks like ear being a socket and the doctor just plugs a couple of big wires into it. No thanks to CIs! :squint:


Actually hearing aids sometimes just doesn't work for all Deafies. Some opt to live without the hearing aids, others try out the CI if they're willing to do it. I understand your opinion.

HAs have been around longer, yes, but CIs are improving, more advanced technology than HAs.

There is some form of stem cell for restoration of hearing... it worked in mice/rats so far, but haven't been successful or practiced in humans yet. I think it's an amazing advancement. No, I'm not saying that if it comes out, we all should go for it. I think it would be great for recently deafen adults, or those who deny deafness.
 
Actually some CI-users eventually have "super-hearing" with the newer devices. It's kinda funny and ironic. So, it doesn't just make Deafies w/ CI "hard of hearing" they might hear and understand without lipreading (including talking on the phone). But it doesn't happen to every user.

Remember, those with the CI are still deaf. They're deaf in the shower, in the water, and at night.

It sort of appalls me whenever I read an article about the CI being a "miracle" or something that "restored [the individual's] hearing" It is NOT true!!! *grrr* :evil:
 
Back
Top