Trojan Nuclear plant imploded in Oregon

sequoias

Active Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
22,242
Reaction score
19
http://www.komotv.com/stories/43542.htm

(there's a video clip of it in the link above)

Trojan Nuclear Plant's Cooling Tower Imploded

May 21, 2006

Video : KOMO 4 NEWS
Demolition crews destroyed the 499-foot cooling tower at Oregon's only commercial nuclear power plant Sunday morning, leaving a cloud of dust and multi-ton pile of rubble.

Trojan Nuclear Plant's Cooling Tower Imploded

RAINIER, ORE. - Demolition crews destroyed the 499-foot cooling tower at the decommissioned Trojan nuclear power plant Sunday, eliminating a Northwest landmark and a longtime reminder of the controversy over nuclear energy.

With a rumble, the tower leaned to the side and collapsed upon itself - leaving an enormous cloud of dust and multi-ton pile of rubble. It took 2,792 pounds of dynamite and only a few seconds to bring it down.

"It was amazing," said Wanda Obermeier, who was among the onlookers gathered on both sides of the Columbia River Sunday morning to watch the implosion.

Portland General Electric, the utility that built and owns Trojan, ordered the tower destroyed as part of its decommissioning.

"It was sort of bittersweet," said Steve Nichols, PGE's general manager at Trojan. "The bitter part we sort of addressed when it closed down ... The sweet part will be when we finish a job well done."

Trojan closed in 1993 for financial and safety reasons and has been gradually decommissioned since then. It remains the state's only commercial nuclear power plant.

The tower was a landmark, an icon or an eyesore - depending on who you talk to.

"It should have been left as a monument to the failure of this technology and the arrogance of those who promoted it," said Lloyd Marbet, a longtime opponent of Trojan.

Over the years, Trojan faced a number of opponents concerned about the safety of nuclear power. Activists brought numerous initiatives to voters and petitions to regulators to shut the plant down. Many activists celebrated throughout the weekend, including throwing a party with cooling tower-shaped piInatas.

Others celebrated their own way. At the Goble Tavern, once a watering hole for Trojan employees, some guests stayed up all night celebrating the event. There were bands, camping and even a T-shirt designer selling Trojan implosion memorabilia.

The massive tower did dominate the landscape along the Columbia River about 40 miles north of Portland. It was a landmark that could be seen from nearby highways, including a long stretch of Interstate 5, the main West Coast corridor. It also held a lot of memories for people in the surrounding areas.

"I wish they would keep it standing," said Mike Bering, a St. Helens resident who used to work at the plant. "I hate to see it go."

Others, like Jeff Garrison, were less sentimental.

"I never like seeing it, it just didn't fit with the landscape," he said.

The tower was the largest to be destroyed in the nation, according to the contractor, Controlled Demolition Inc.

A small portion of the base remained but explosives reduced the majority of the to a pile of steel and concrete rubble.

"It looks this morning like things went perfectly," said Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition.

Because of its size and unusually strong build, Loizeaux said the tower is of keen interest to the nuclear power industry.

"Everybody is watching," Loizeaux said. "Because at some point in time, their's will have to come down."

PGE estimates the plant will not be fully decommissioned until 2024. Remaining buildings will be destroyed gradually through 2008. The spent radioactive fuel rods, which sit above ground, must be moved to a federal repository that hasn't been developed yet.
 
Veering off slightly, the very last sentence speaks of move spent nuclear rods to someplace that hasn't been developed yet. This is my main beef with nuclear power. The powers to be (AKA...Idiots) have yet to come up with a coherent policy for long term storage of these rods. I assume that the place yet to be developed is Nevada (tied up in the courts). So, why are we still doing nuclear power and putting these "DANGERIOUS" rods in places that can cause tremendous environmental damage and worst kill people or even worst yet cause extremely long term effects on the population at large?

It is just appalling to me that the gov't and private industries have no real plan to deal with this in an intelligent way.
 
Working in a nuclear powered plant pays good money. I still would not work there. I remember some people who lived near the 3 mile nuclear plant here in Pennsylvania. They said they still struggle with a wide range of health problems.

I would take a job that pays good money and is not dangerous to my health.
 
Back
Top