Reporters get 12-year terms in N. Korea

[Foxrac]

Jiro, I found out that NK missile is 6 KT, that what NK has test and that's so weaker.
Ground Zero II | Carloslabs

Just use bar and find NK missile then test yourself.

 

[Jiro]

Fine, you can believe whatever you want about Russia.

SK is already take care and made planning when NK declare threat against SK.
South Korea Eyes Independent Missile Defense System

It's still ineffective in any case. It's like shooting at bullet with a bullet.

None of NK's missile is bigger as Tsar Bomba, I means refer radius as measure in KT or MT, NK's missile could be much as 300 KT or less, you can test with Seoul and just find missile that's less than 300 KT, also you maybe never know about NK's missile could be fail in some cases.
Ground Zero | Carloslabs

How you feel if Seoul become destruction city with everything is destroyed?

I would feel sad. All my relatives are in Seoul. NK has hundreds, if not thousands of missile. Like I said - it takes just 1 to hit Seoul. Hitting Seoul is equivalent to hitting NYC + DC at same time. It's that bad.

We would like to aim the nuclear missile at Pyongyang and many cities in NK if NK has done to hurt SK so far.

yes - that's why it's a lose-lose situation. NK knows they will lose the war but NK's got nothing to lose. SK has many to lose.

1 nuke in Seoul = economical & political instability and civil unrest for months plus - it would be inhabitable for many years.

 

[Jiro]

Jiro, I found out that NK missile is 6 KT, that what NK has test and that's so weaker.
Ground Zero II | Carloslabs

Just use bar and find NK missile then test yourself.

why should they waste more KT for test? Maybe they will have 20KT for Seoul if war happens. Maybe not. We don't know anything about what NK has. Do you wanna play guessing game? cuz I don't want to.

 

[Foxrac]

It's still ineffective in any case. It's like shooting at bullet with a bullet.


I would feel sad. All my relatives are in Seoul. NK has hundreds, if not thousands of missile. Like I said - it takes just 1 to hit Seoul. Hitting Seoul is equivalent to hitting NYC + DC at same time. It's that bad.


yes - that's why it's a lose-lose situation. NK knows they will lose the war but NK's got nothing to lose. SK has many to lose.

1 nuke in Seoul = economical & political instability and civil unrest for months plus - it would be inhabitable for many years.

Remember about Japan? 2 cities in Japan has been hit by nuclear weapon during end of WWII but both of cities already recovered.

1 nuke won't destroy all part of Seoul, it need take more than 50 missiles to make completely destroyed.

I doubt that both NK and SK will go out of control for long time.